RobjHunt
Regular
Correct! Via a thousand eyes.I suspect he doesn’t realise on this site we do our research and check and double check claims.
Pantene.
Correct! Via a thousand eyes.I suspect he doesn’t realise on this site we do our research and check and double check claims.
2 GREEN days in a rowCorrect! Via a thousand eyes.
Pantene.
Does anyone know anything about the latest patent and why, unlike patents in the past, it hasn’t been announced?
Its only 3am, 31/08 in US.Does anyone know anything about the latest patent and why, unlike patents in the past, it hasn’t been announced?
Hi @krugerrands
Let me say at the outset I am a huge fan of autonomous vehicles. Not an ounce of fear to be found. One day my sight will mean that I will no longer have a licence to drive. I want autonomy.
My negativity comes from the English Common Law which like AKIDA was designed by imperfect men to incrementally improve itself. You see English jurists thought of this idea centuries before Peter van der Made and you thought lawyers contribute nothing.
In consequence in 1892 the English Appeals Court set in train a new line of legal theory and practise in the famous Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company decision.
To a large extent before this case industry acted in a cavalier fashion regarding its obligations to the consumer. What flowed from this case was a framework for the modern consideration that if you are engaged in an enterprise for profit you must do so in a fashion that you will not cause injury to others. If doing so is not economically viable hard luck. Go away and don’t come back until you can.
The approach adopted by Tesla and followed by others is to cast this aside and sell vehicles that are not fit for purpose on the basis it would be too expensive for it to be done any other way. Well I say hard luck go away and come back when you can.
This idea plays out constantly with new medical treatments. Companies trying to invent cures for all sorts of diseases have to show safety in animal models and then if this is shown recruit human volunteers and show safety in humans and then they can proceed further. If they cannot recruit human volunteers at any stage hard luck go away and come back when you can. They are not allowed to sell the untested drug to people and collect the statistics on the basis well if a few die so what.
If I produce a toaster and it has a fault that causes the back panel to be electrified and potentially deadly to touch a warning on the box will not be deemed sufficient and I have to make it fit for purpose or go away until I can. My claim that it is too expensive will not resonate.
Very early in the piece an autonomous vehicle engineer gained some notoriety by saying that the public would have to get used to a few deaths to achieve autonomous driving. Well I say B.S. to this idea.
As much as Tesla would like for the masses to believe they have a higher mission it is no higher than making profits to fund the lifestyles and hobbies of those who own the company which includes shareholders.
If Tesla came out tomorrow and said we are becoming a not for profit and the value of all shareholdings will now revert to zero and dividends will never materialise they would not last one minute longer than it takes to call an EGM to kick them all out.
So I say to Tesla and others humans are not crash test dummies. Come back when your vehicles are safe.
Also I think you will find that with experience and practice the driving skills of humans does incrementally improve even amongst the worst of human drivers.
True at a certain point in the growing and ageing process those abilities will also deteriorate however the same thing happens to machines, cars and computers included.
When a Tesla is brand new and drives out of the showroom it will commence to age and overtime just like the human driver it’s battery will fade and it’s circuits will corrode and its performance will suffer. Lettuce will cost $10.00 and owners will choose food over car servicing.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
SYMBOL | PRICE | CHANGE | %CHANGE |
---|---|---|---|
*FTSE | 7,364.8 | +3.17 | +0.04 |
*DAX | 12,995.8 | +34.66 | +0.27 |
CAC | 6,220.49 | +10.27 | +0.17 |
*STOXX600 | 420.6 | +0.79 | +0.19 |
AEX | 696.35 | +6.04 | +0.87 |
BEL 20 | 3,642.4 | +13.06 | +0.36 |
*FTSE MIB | 21,890.91 | +65.69 | +0.3 |
OMXS30 | 1,949.58 | +7.15 | +0.37 |
*SMI | 10,896.1 | +11.15 | +0.1 |
HEX | 10,728.58 | +40.43 | +0.38 |
PSI20 | 6,044.1 | +23.54 | +0.39 |
OMXC 25 | 1,654.67 | -1.18 | -0.07 |
RUSSIA | 2,399.47 | +92.85 | +4.03 |
Yes, but the issue date was 30/08. I guess I can wait until tomorrow before getting cranky.Its only 3am, 31/08 in US.
I'm not talking about assistance systems.“I don't really see the added value in completely autonomous driving” look up Tony Seba or Ark invest and they will give you billions of reasons
Or they basically do whatever Larry Fink advises them to do.....Brainchip's share price has closely followed the Dow, S&P and NASDAQ over the last month.
Jerome Powell's speech has put the US markets into a quandary. The Fed Uses a checklist of five measurements in its deliberations on Monetary Policy. They are illustrated below:
View attachment 15518
So, one question would be how are those measures of aggregate real economic activity going, and how do they compare to previous recessions? Because the US may not be anywhere near a recession at present.
View attachment 15519
That doesn't say that the US won't enter into a recession soon, but the facts at present don't align with this.
So the purpose of my post is to show that a continued fall in equity markets won't occur because of recession fears.
If the US markets can find a base somewhere around current levels, hopefully BRN also has found a base.
Eventually the bumbling bureaucrats will take the pleasure of driving away from you but I feel we are safe for quite a few years at least.I'm not talking about assistance systems.
It will be a long time before AD dominates the road and becomes the ubiquitous standard as in movies. This will be slowed down by the extra costs that the OEMs will charge. And in person buses fully AD simply eliminates a job with near to no added value. Until driverless cabs become standard it will pass more time. And here, too, the added value lies in the elimination of the job. Of course everything will be safer. Assistance systems clearly save lives here of course. Until this is also generally the case for AD 5 most vehicles will have to be of them.
I mean it's very nice that this is also a market for us. But I personally don't attach much importance to it except for the assistance systems. I think that already the trip with the EQXX to the Mediterranean was very economical but not much fun - for me. Some roads there are gorgeous and others so narrow that I can only imagine they are impossible for an AD5 EV. A human can signal to the opposing vehicle that he will back into the gap. I imagine two such vehicles facing each other on a too narrow road, each with drivers who have forgotten how to drive. It's certainly funny.
With AD at level 5 driving degrades for me to pure transportation from A to B. And whether I prefer to be transported by an experienced driver or a system that I can not say yet. I'm more of an old hand. Up to now I like to change gears which makes driving fun. Driving fun is interesting for me. But I'll see where it takes me and I could always change my mind later.
I know I'm one of the very few and that will also end for me at some point with a linear torque tableau. I am sure of that.Eventually the bumbling bureaucrats will take the pleasure of driving away from you but I feel we are safe for quite a few years at least.
Enjoy the stick shift.
Looks like Akida was off the scale ...looking around and not sure if this has been posted before?
Natesh Ganesh
@GaneshNatesh
Replying to
@criticalneuro
Neuromorphic as in spiking? Here is a benchmarking image from Intel on their Loihi neuromorphic system.
5:28 AM · Aug 31, 2022·Twitter Web App
View attachment 15523
Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) provide an efficient computational mechanism for temporal signal processing, especially when coupled with low-power SNN inference ASICs. SNNs have been historically difficult to configure, lacking a general method for finding solutions for arbitrary tasks. In recent years, gradient-descent optimization methods have been applied to SNNs with increasing ease. SNNs and SNN inference processors therefore offer a good platform for commercial low-power signal processing in energy constrained environments without cloud dependencies. However, to date these methods have not been accessible to ML engineers in industry, requiring graduate-level training to successfully configure a single SNN application. Here we demonstrate a convenient high-level pipeline to design, train and deploy arbitrary temporal signal processing applications to sub-mW SNN inference hardware. We apply a new straightforward SNN architecture designed for temporal signal processing, using a pyramid of synaptic time constants to extract signal features at a range of temporal scales. We demonstrate this architecture on an ambient audio classification task, deployed to the Xylo SNN inference processor in streaming mode. Our application achieves high accuracy (98%) and low latency (100ms) at low power (<4muW inference power). Our approach makes training and deploying SNN applications available to ML engineers with general NN backgrounds, without requiring specific prior experience with spiking NNs. We intend for our approach to make Neuromorphic hardware and SNNs an attractive choice for commercial low-power and edge signal processing applications.