BrainChip + SiFive

This seems to be the extract:

Besides the fact that RISC-V is open source(and thus has no licensing or royalties attached), the energy savings offered by RISC-V could make it an ideal co-processor. The increasing regulations and requirements for electronic devices to minimise their energy usage is putting pressure on manufacturers to find ways to reduce their energy consumption, and CPUs are one of the biggest energy consumers in modern computers. Furthermore, the ability to reduce the energy consumption of a CPU also makes it ideal for use in portable applications such as laptops and tablets, as it will extend battery life.”

My opinion only DYOR
FF

AKIDA BALLISTA
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9 users
Bit of information on RISC-v for you to digest on a Sunday @Fact Finder

Hi Rocket577

I think this is a 'could do better' comment on your respective report cards.

Having said that while the methodology used by the PHD candidate is rather convoluted and impractical until someone does the list of things they point out at the end this thesis confirms the SiFive and Brainchip statement that SiFive has confirmed the interoperability of RISC-V and AKIDA.

The only part of this thesis that makes this clear is in the Introduction and I quote:

"The designed architecture exploits the serial peripheral interface (SPI) to let the RISC-V core configure the accelerator parameters, thus offloading the SNN task on ODIN. The capability of the system to work as a standalone device has been validated by configuring a synfire chain simulation without the intervention of an host computer."

So this thesis kind of reinvents the wheel and determines that there is probably a much better more efficient shape than a hexagon and it looks to someone to invent it and suggests a good name might be a circle.

My opinion only DYOR
FF

AKIDA BALLISTA
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
  • Haha
Reactions: 5 users

Terroni2105

Founding Member
Another tweet from our partners yesterday, they are really giving us some air time on their tweets.

you know the drill, click below and give it a like.

 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 15 users
  • Like
Reactions: 8 users

stuart888

Regular
This 3-minute read is great for people who don't understand Risc-V, even at a high level. It goes over what this is all about: the software that talks directly to the hardware. Plus, the Risc-V Architecture vs Arm Architecture. I am sure there are plenty of people like me, that never did any lower level coding directed at hardware.

Brainchip Investors should understand the high level basics, and this article does it nicely and quickly. Click "Continue to Site", to move the opening banner ad out of the way.
https://circuitdigest.com/article/u...ure-and-why-it-could-be-a-replacement-for-arm

1650827829591.png
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 15 users
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 14 users
Naveed getting the BrainChip name out to his 36,356 followers

3826A16F-10AA-4999-8ED9-91BF051A2E71.jpeg



F1EB2E36-9070-47AB-8D9C-0ECB93B6F3A3.jpeg





RISC-V companies SiFive, Esperanto Technologies, Inc and others continue their march on AI related workloads.

The other day, we reported on Esperanto Technologies, Inc chip bring up, today we report on news from SiFive .


SiFive and BrainChip Partner to Demo IP Compatibility

By Sally Ward-Foxton


SiFive and BrainChip have partnered to show their IP is compatible in SoC designs for embedded artificial intelligence (AI). The companies have demonstrated BrainChip’s neuromorphic processing unit (NPU) IP working alongside SiFive’s RISC–V host processor IP.

Brainchip’s NPU processor IP, the basis for its Akida chip, is a neuromorphic processor designed to accelerate spiking neural networks. This IP can be used to analyze inputs from most sensor types, including cameras, to provide ultra–low power analysis in real–time applications. A recent BrainChip demo showed its Akida chip in a vehicle, detecting the driver, recognizing the driver’s face, and identifying their voice simultaneously. Keyword spotting required 600 µW, facial recognition needed 22 mW, and the visual wake–word inference used to detect the driver was 6–8 mW.

SiFive is a provider of RISC–V processor IP, including its Intelligence series of multi–core capable RISC–V processors with vector extensions which are optimized for AI workloads in edge devices.

“BrainChip can run [AI] algorithms on their own, but when they move into a larger system, they will need a host processor,” Chris Jones, vice president, product at SiFive, told EE Times. “You could pick a host processor that does nothing but scheduling, or you could pick a host processor that actually contributes to the AI processing, and that’s where the SiFive Intelligence product comes in.”

In an SoC design for edge AI, the AI workload would typically be split between host processor, vector processor, and AI accelerator — some parts of edge workloads are better suited to general purpose compute rather than a dedicated AI accelerator, Jones said.

“It’s advantageous for BrainChip to align with industry leaders to make sure their customers have a seamless integration experience, so BrainChip can deliver the requisite software that runs on the host processor and makes it easier for the end user to integrate their products and ours,” he said.

Details:
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 24 users
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 17 users
Query from Ayush the engineer from Qualcomm below. 33,108 potential combined followers will see the answer

I don’t know the answer 😀

@chapman89



View attachment 4948

View attachment 4949
View attachment 4954


View attachment 4951
View attachment 4952
View attachment 4953
I have sent your find to the US Office on the basis it might offer a lead given what could be a more natural way to start a long and fruitful relationship than answering a question.

Great research. The World isn’t big enough to escape the gaze of the 1,000 Eyes.

My opinion only DYOR
FF

AKIDA BALLISTA
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 16 users
I have sent your find to the US Office on the basis it might offer a lead given what could be a more natural way to start a long and fruitful relationship than answering a question.

Great research. The World isn’t big enough to escape the gaze of the 1,000 Eyes.

My opinion only DYOR
FF

AKIDA BALLISTA

Awesome thanks mate!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Query from Ayush the engineer from Qualcomm below. 33,108 potential combined followers will see the answer

I don’t know the answer 😀

@chapman89



View attachment 4948

View attachment 4949
View attachment 4954


View attachment 4951
View attachment 4952
View attachment 4953

Hello Tony Dawe - Manager of Investor Relations at BrainChip

0DF205A7-F4C2-4AFE-A1CD-D7ADF33213CE.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 12 users
D

Deleted member 118

Guest
Hopefully brainchip can play some play some roll in this as well.

 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 5 users
D

Deleted member 118

Guest
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 4 users
Rather than just a surface view I can see the real underlying mutual benefits here.

BRN hedge against any potential decline in ARM with additional avenues to market and SiFive build on the ecosystem and also their capabilities against some established players.

Creating a novel tech that may be better is one thing...getting & growing mkt share and commercial space is another.





  1. TECHNOLOGY
  2. SILICON
April 5, 2022updated 06 Apr 2022 1:12pm

Can SiFive thrive? Chip designer needs a strong RISC-V ecosystem to succeed​

SiFive is making waves in the RISC-V chip space, but will need community support to challenge established designers.
By Matthew Gooding


Chip designer SiFive swelled its coffers last month with a funding round worth $175m, taking the total invested in the company to more than $350m. SiFive has rapidly become the biggest and best-known company developing chips built on RISC-V, an open-source chip architecture long touted as a rival to x86 and Arm, and has now set its sights on developing high-performance processors based on RISC-V.

1624px-SiFive_HiFive1_32418936265-1024x681.png
SiFive’s HiFive1 development board. The company is a leading player in the RISC-V chip space. (Photo Wikimedia Commons)
The Series-F round, led by Coatue Management, values the company at $2.5bn, and is validation not only for SiFive but for the RISC-V ecosystem as a whole, according to SiFive CEO Patrick Little. “The market has spoken and made it abundantly clear that RISC-V computing will be competing for the heart of all future computing platforms,” Little said. “As the founder and market leader of RISC-V computing it’s our role to lead this ecosystem forward and offer customers an advanced computing alternative to Arm and others.”

It has been a busy few weeks for SiFive, which also disposed of OpenFive, its business unit working on chip connectivity, by selling it to Canadian company AlphaWave for $210m, leaving it free to focus on CPUs. With over $300m to play with, it is well-positioned to cement its position as the leading RISC-V chip developer, but faces increasing competition. Its success or failure could hinge on a strong relationship with the wider RISC-V community.

The growing RISC-V ecosystem​

Emerging in 2010 from the Parallel Computing Lab at UC Berkeley in California, RISC-V is a modular instruction set architecture (ISA) which allows developers to build chips on top of a core, openly available, instruction set.

It has gained in popularity in recent years, particularly since uncertainty began to grow around the future of Arm, the British chip designer which provided the blueprints for chips that power most of the world’s mobile devices. Arm was due to be sold by current owner, SoftBank, to another chip company, Nvidia, for some $40bn, raising questions about whether its vendor-agnostic licensing model would continue, but the plug was pulled on the deal in January after mounting regulatory problems.

Arm is set to be relisted on the public markets and remain an independent company, but despite this, Alan Priestley, VP analyst at Gartner, says the “damage has already been done”, and businesses are looking at alternatives, including RISC-V. “A lot of companies are looking at alternate sources of IP, maybe not switching totally away from Arm, but having the option of Arm or RISC-V in their products,” he says. “RISC-V was already gaining traction before SoftBank decided to try and offload Arm, and I think that has increased the focus of some of the semiconductor companies on RISC-V as an alternative.”

Indeed, the RISC-V Foundation, a non-profit organisation which oversees the ecosystem, counts some of the biggest names in tech among its members including Intel, which in February announced it had joined the RISC-V board and would be investing in the technology as part of its push to provide more foundry services to third parties.

The evolution of SiFive and its importance to RISC-V​

SiFive was set up in 2015 by Krste Asanović, Yunsup Lee, and Andrew Waterman, three of the Berkeley researchers who invented RISC-V. A fabless company, meaning it designs but doesn’t produce processors, it released the first commercial system-on-chip based on RISC-V, the HiFive development board in 2017. This first-mover advantage means SiFive is “the big player in the space”, says Steven Dickens, senior analyst at Futurum Research, and in the wake of its recent funding announcement the company claimed it has more than 100 customers around the world, with some of the public cloud hyperscalers and the top semiconductor manufacturers using its designs. As a private company, it doesn’t report revenue.


Little, a former Qualcomm executive, took up the role of CEO in 2020, and under his leadership SiFive has been focusing on producing high-performance CPUs. This focus is reflected in the company’s sell-off of OpenFive, says Dickens. “This is SiFive stating it has found what it is really good at, which is doing high-performance processor design, and it believes there’s a big addressable market that it can lay claim to,” he says. “So [AlphaWave] has come along and offered it a chunk of money for something it doesn’t consider an important part of its business, and together with the recent raise, it now has the funds to help it double down on its core focus.”

When SiFive’s chips will be able to match the performance of their Arm counterparts remains to be seen. The company’s most advanced chip, the 16-processor core P650, came out late last year, offering comparable performance to Arm’s Cortex A77 range which was released in 2019, but not the latest Arm designs, the Neoverse. Dickens says the recent investment could help narrow the gap. “They need to build out their team and increase their partner work,” he says. “Chip design is a capital-intensive space, but this is a relatively small company with a tight focus.”

Gartner’s Priestley believes RISC-V chips are some way off matching their Arm counterparts. “We’ve yet to see anything that could compete against the Neoverse, or the stuff that Apple and Ampere are doing at the high end of the Arm space, and we’ve yet to see a x86 class processor operating the RISC-V instruction set,” he says. “It’s possible, but it hasn’t happened yet.”

Apple has been working on its own high-performance chip designs for laptops and mobile devices, the M1 series, for the past two years. Ampere focuses on server chips and its top-of-the-range model, the Altra Max, boasts 128 processor cores.

Priestley adds that other businesses are developing RISC-V cores which could surpass those produced by SiFive. “SiFive is the company that has had a lot of noise recently, but there are others like Western Digital and Codasip who produce comparable RISC-V cores,” he says. “Imagination has just announced RISC-V cores and is targeting the advanced end of the market.”

The future of SiFive​

Futurum Research’s Dickens believes SiFive is well-placed to succeed thanks to the growing RISC-V ecosystem. “There have been a lot of attempts to develop a third chip architecture to rival Arm and x86,” he says. “Where this stuff lives or dies is the ecosystem; the software support and the people architecting and writing software for it,” he says. “That’s why I believe SiFive will be successful, because it isn’t trying to lift RISC-V on its own. They are riding on the coat-tails of an ecosystem which has its own momentum. If SiFive went away, it would make a big dent in that ecosystem, but I think it would continue to grow without them.”

He adds that the geopolitical situation, and the growing importance of emerging markets such as India and China, mean the opportunity for RISC-V will also expand. “Chipmakers in these parts of the world potentially don’t want to take Intel or Arm’s approach,” he says. “If you’re an Indian start-up wanting to create a new chip, are you going to throw your lot in with a US company like Intel when it comes to R&D? Or are you going to choose to be part of an open-source community? In a geopolitical landscape that’s probably more fractured than it ever has been, I think an open-source chip architecture that’s not run by a Western company is appealing.”

This in turn presents more opportunities for companies like SiFive, even if the bigger chipmakers become more active in the space, Dickens argues. “SiFive is heavily involved in the RISC-V community, they sit on a bunch of its committees,” he says. “They’re heavily invested in trying to promote the project, and it may seem counterintuitive, but it helps them if bigger competitors start to take an interest because it validates the technology.”

He adds: “SiFive has got some deep pockets now, and some smart guys on the team. Now they need to go and execute.”
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 14 users

Terroni2105

Founding Member
SiFive tweeting us again :D
Click and give it a like

 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 29 users

Proga

Regular
SiFive tweeting us again :D
Click and give it a like


Looks to me SiFive have identified BRN as their lead vehicle if they are to succeed and are eager to advocate Akida
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
  • Thinking
Reactions: 13 users

ndefries

Regular
Looks to me SiFive have identified BRN as their lead vehicle if they are to succeed and are eager to advocate Akida
Could you see a merged company with BRN and listing on NASDAQ. Then a take over from Intel?
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 3 users

Proga

Regular
Could you see a merged company with BRN and listing on NASDAQ. Then a take over from Intel?
Anything is possible but not anytime soon. The larger shareholders of BRN can see the intrinsic value and are prepared to wait for it to be realised. I understand your thinking though. A 3 way relationship is beginning to emerge.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

ndefries

Regular
Anything is possible but not anytime soon. The larger shareholders of BRN can see the intrinsic value and are prepared to wait for it to be realised. I understand your thinking though. A 3 way relationship is beginning to emerge.
True but SiFive could be a giant and rising together isn't a problem and makes communicating to the market more powerful. Also the quicker we leave the ASX the better. Intel is getting as close as they can to SiFive since their t/o offer rejected and each day that goes by the takeover price rises as the reality of RISC-V processors becomes understood.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
Top Bottom