BET would be a great buy for Newscorp at the current market cap of under $300mill .. especially considering BetR are going to be paying $30mill to BET a year alone .. shows how cheap the share price currently isNews Corp bets even bigger on 100-1 bookie
The media company now owns half of online bookmaker Betr, whose promotions became one of the biggest stories during the Melbourne Cup.www.afr.com
Interesting Davey sat out the new funding round ... Trip and Murdoch doubling down ....
Good to hear from you Reg!!… hopefully 2nd quarter results exceed $30mill revenue and they are cash flow positive do you have any predictions on the results ??
You are probably right .. but they will need to be cash flow positive before the end of 2023 to eliminate the need of a cash raising and also prove to the market that all of the growth in revenue continues to be out weighed by the increase costs .Hey Ibetfixed…..I was just contemplating that exact thing….we will crack through the $30M mark this quarter I believe but cash flow positive would be a surprise if you ask me….got to spend money to make money they say, we have to gear up for the foreseeable growth.
The US market will be interesting…..NJ will expand once the season kicks back in…….Fixed-odds is slow to progress in other States but our model in NJ needs to be perfect as all eyes are watching its progress and to see if it eats into the Parimutuel Pool.
Its a new year….Bet on it!
Retail investors are going to cry blue murder if BET doesn’t hit the cash flow positive mark with these results.Hey Ibetfixed…..I was just contemplating that exact thing….we will crack through the $30M mark this quarter I believe but cash flow positive would be a surprise if you ask me….got to spend money to make money they say, we have to gear up for the foreseeable growth.
The US market will be interesting…..NJ will expand once the season kicks back in…….Fixed-odds is slow to progress in other States but our model in NJ needs to be perfect as all eyes are watching its progress and to see if it eats into the Parimutuel Pool.
Its a new year….Bet on it!
In the last webinar they said they would be cash flow positive in the second half of this FY. So don’t be surprised if they are not in the next results released.Retail investors are going to cry blue murder if BET doesn’t hit the cash flow positive mark with these results.
The loyalists will hang in there but there are plenty of restless natives.
I haven’t seen the latest RaaS report … what does it predict for the revenue received for the quarter ending 31st Dec??Based on the RaaS reports they are not expecting to be cash flow positive the first half of the year…….so i’ll guess you will have 6 months of ‘rustic’ calling us all punts!
Haha yep I’m not holding out on cashflow positive in this report.Based on the RaaS reports they are not expecting to be cash flow positive the first half of the year…….so i’ll guess you will have 6 months of ‘rustic’ calling us all punts!
@TeddyFiles, Why do you call shareholders that aim to hold the board accountable for realising their commitments a ‘lynch mob’? Are you suggesting that shareholders ought to further lower their expectations of management’s performance?Haha yep I’m not holding out on cashflow positive in this report.
Again Todd will be ripped a new one because he basically said they would be and the lynch mob will be again calling for his head.
I think that BET have done a phenomenal job bringing the company to where it is today. This is obviously not reflected in the SP but I can’t see how this is totally their fault.@TeddyFiles, Why do you call shareholders that aim to hold the board accountable for realising their commitments a ‘lynch mob’? Are you suggesting that shareholders ought to further lower their expectations of management’s performance?
Cheers Teddy, I appreciate your candour.I think that BET have done a phenomenal job bringing the company to where it is today. This is obviously not reflected in the SP but I can’t see how this is totally their fault.
The Tripp deal seems to be the biggest bone of contention. I for one am happy with the deal and what it will hopefully deliver long term.
The TW deal was so long ago that any new shareholder had all the details of this deal and could have made a decision not to buy in. Could BET have locked his shares up for longer? Who knows. It was business and there are two sides in all transactions. Again I don’t blame TW for what he has done with his shares. Smart business.
Do I have an issue with the ASX on allowing shorted/loaned shares to be paid back off market? Yes I do.
You can do your best to keep the CEO accountable but whilst he has the confidence of the major stake holders you are pissing into a fan.
I'll change my tune if I see some positive movement in the impending 4C report. Still, as it stands, I cannot see how the board is fulfilling its fiduciary obligation and that it is acting in the best interest of shareholders. I don't mind pissing into a fan if it helps in any way to remind the company that it cannot simply siphon profits without scrutiny and that it must provide shareholder returns.Cheers Teddy, I appreciate your candour.
I think the biggest bone of contention is that the CEO (and the board) have diminished credibility. E.g. According to the deal put to shareholders, Tripp wasn't to be paid additional cash on top, but he was, and NJ fixed odds was on its way to being rolled out, but it wasn't.
The ASX announcements to date, particularly the one in which Tripp's bonus was announced, seem designed to obfuscate. Looking back at the Topbetta history doesn't instil me with confidence. Yeah, revenue has grown, but most of that growth is due to buying Sportech with investors' funds and through other investor-funded (or diluted) 'sponsorship' arrangements.
How sure are you that the CEO has the confidence of major stakeholders? Should we be calling you Todd
I would like them to win business without giving away large amounts of cash or options. Simply offering the best product at a competitive price.I think that BET have done a phenomenal job bringing the company to where it is today. This is obviously not reflected in the SP but I can’t see how this is totally their fault.
The Tripp deal seems to be the biggest bone of contention. I for one am happy with the deal and what it will hopefully deliver long term.
The TW deal was so long ago that any new shareholder had all the details of this deal and could have made a decision not to buy in. Could BET have locked his shares up for longer? Who knows. It was business and there are two sides in all transactions. Again I don’t blame TW for what he has done with his shares. Smart business.
Do I have an issue with the ASX on allowing shorted/loaned shares to be paid back off market? Yes I do.
You can do your best to keep the CEO accountable but whilst he has the confidence of the major stake holders you are pissing into a fan.