AVZ Discussion 2022

tonster66

Regular
Timely with the ICC decision

1751497160077.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19 users

Jongo

Regular
Trump is going for the 'low hanging fruit' wrt establishing economic and security win-win arrangements with other African countries. Subsequently, the momenentum generated will focus on the more difficult DRC/Rwanda/M23 equation.

From Coplilot ...

Here’s how the Trump African Leaders’ Summit (9–11 July 2025) ties into the broader U.S. minerals strategy across Africa, and what ripple effects it might have on the DRC–U.S. minerals-for-security agreement and KoBold’s ambitions at Manono:

🌍 The U.S. Minerals Strategy Across Africa

🎯 Strategic Goals
  • Secure supply chains for critical minerals (lithium, cobalt, copper, rare earths)
  • Counter China’s dominance in African mining via private sector-led partnerships
  • Embed resource deals within a governance and security framework, especially in unstable regions
🤝 Key Initiatives
  • Lobito Corridor: $5B investment to unlock export routes for Congolese and Zambian minerals
  • U.S.–DRC Framework: Tied to peace with M23 rebels, includes support for mining infrastructure and development
  • KoBold Metals: Serving as the flagship example of U.S-backed resource diplomacy

🌐 Why the West African Delegation Matters

While Liberia, Senegal, Mauritania, Guinea-Bissau, and Gabon aren't neighbors to the DRC, their participation signals:
  • Pan-African Engagement: U.S. isn't limiting its resource diplomacy to the Copperbelt; it’s creating a continental coalition
  • Model Deals: Countries like Liberia and Gabon are exploring similar public-private partnerships for bauxite and iron ore, making them strategic testbeds
  • Multilateral Leverage: A collective African bloc improves bargaining power on royalties, governance, and anti-corruption safeguards
⛏️ Implications for KoBold & AVZ at Manono

FactorImpact
Diplomatic MomentumThe summit boosts pressure on DRC to finalize peace with M23 and accept KoBold’s acquisition deal
Investor ConfidencePromotes confidence among U.S. investors and stakeholders—Rio Tinto, Breakthrough Energy, etc.—to support mining in conflict-prone zones
Timeline AccelerationA successful summit and peace deal may expedite approvals and project groundwork by early 2026
Strategic AlignmentKoBold’s $1B+ commitment aligns with the summit’s goal to showcase U.S. commercial investment as an alternative to China’s influence
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 11 users

Roon

Regular
Cong was the one trying to stiff AVZ . He had access to that money and refused to take it (although I speculate he may be one the who had it stolen ). So does that now make the missing $$$ his problem ?
The ruling seems to suggest the missing $$ is our problem, as we now have to come up somehow with 15m to pay Dathomir.

If I read that correctly, anyway?
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 3 users

Mvdl5150

Emerged
Sorry to bother everyone but where can I find any official notifications of the stolen 20 million that was the payment for the 10% sale to Simon Cong
 

Roon

Regular
Sorry to bother everyone but where can I find any official notifications of the stolen 20 million that was the payment for the 10% sale to Simon Cong
There's an AVZ announcement on this topic from some time ago - go to the AVZ website
 

Samus

Top 20
There's an AVZ announcement on this topic from some time ago - go to the AVZ website
I don't actually think it specifies exactly how much was stolen from memory? :unsure:
Might be wrong but I feel like the assumption on tse became that the whole lot was stolen, in reality we don't know how much was stolen?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users

Mvdl5150

Emerged
Been searching, approx at what date was the ann
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Winenut

GO AVZ!!!!
Can anyone explain to me why in the recent ICC determination regarding the purchase of shares from Dathomir AVZ is now obliged to pay another US$15m ????

I thought the funds paid of US$20m that Cong sent back and AVZ placed in safe (cough, cough) escrow was the full payment for the Dathomir shares????

Am I missing something here???

1751506088891.png
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 12 users

Mvdl5150

Emerged
Hence why I wanted to see the Ann regarding the issues over the payment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

Samus

Top 20
Can anyone explain to me why in the recent ICC determination regarding the purchase of shares from Dathomir AVZ is now obliged to pay another US$15m ????

I thought the funds paid of US$20m that Cong sent back and AVZ placed in safe (cough, cough) escrow was the full payment for the Dathomir shares????

Am I missing something here???

View attachment 87955
Yeah Christian Lusaka apparently stole some of it, if not all of it and avz was having trouble checking the account last we heard (I think). What an immense shitshow of epic proportions!
At least it's something to talk about and investigate I guess...
Hopefully somebody can dig up some clarity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11 users

Strongman

Regular
I don't actually think it specifies exactly how much was stolen from memory? :unsure:
Might be wrong but I feel like the assumption on tse became that the whole lot was stolen, in reality we don't know how much was stolen?
Correct mate. I recall the announcement mentioned multiple fraudulent transactions or words to that effect
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9 users

wombat74

Top 20
The ruling seems to suggest the missing $$ is our problem, as we now have to come up somehow with 15m to pay Dathomir.

If I read that correctly, anyway?
If that is the case you'd have to think the only way they are getting that money is if AVZ get a settlement .
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users

Winenut

GO AVZ!!!!
Looks to me like SPA 2019 ($5M) and SPA 2020 ($15M) makes up $20M????:unsure::unsure::unsure:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9 users

Hudnut

Regular
I would have preferred ICC to tell Dathomir the money was paid into the escrow account, AVZ fulfilled their obligations. If you didn't take it and left it there and someone else pissed off with it that's your problem.
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
  • Sad
Reactions: 25 users

Roon

Regular
I would have preferred ICC to tell Dathomir the money was paid into the escrow account, AVZ fulfilled their obligations. If you didn't take it and left it there and someone else pissed off with it that's your problem.
Although it was the escrow account set up at our behest by our lawyer. So you could see why people may point to us on this one. Even though that was only because Cong had sent back the funds that had rightly paid for the stock (as the latest ruling shows, though the 5% not ruled on yet).

What a tangled web all this is
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 6 users

UtterMoron

Regular
Deduct the 15m from Comminiere's fines, and get the sticky fingered bastard lawyers later once the rest of the fine is paid and that can be used to go after them
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 13 users
Deduct the 15m from Comminiere's fines, and get the sticky fingered bastard lawyers later once the rest of the fine is paid and that can be used to go after them
I don't disagree, it's fucked that this amount of money can just be stolen through completely illegitimate transactions (story of our lives right?). Unfortunately, $15-20M spread across 3.5B shares is going to add like <$0.006 per share in value. Less legal costs. The only people that win are the lawyers, but if it meant enforceable imprisonment of the cunt and leaving him and his family completely broke, I'd still call it a win.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 15 users

Samus

Top 20
1000013758.jpg

I think this is all we ever got from the company, everything else was based on articles and various other hearsay from memory.
We simply don't have clarity on this issue imo.
Might be wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 15 users
Top Bottom