AVZ Discussion 2022

Dave Evans

Regular
Love ya Danger thanks mate for all posts but I don't understand this one?

Just to add to what @Carlos Danger said, I believe the US previously said they were putting sanctions on CATL for supplying critical minerals to China’s military

The other comments I’ve been holding onto and struggling not to put out there are that from all the information put out by KoBold, Bloomberg, Reuters, The Australian and nearly every other media source and announcement I’ve read, I wouldn’t be surprised if

1) AVZ has already stuck the deal with KoBold

2) They’re waiting for the fat fuckwit to say he will grant the ML to KoBold (and he’s waiting for AVZ to drop arbitration)

3) As posted (then deleted) in The Australian newspaper…. KoBold offering US$1.5b plus royalties plus compensation for the north. I believe The Australian was the first media source to mention that Zijin keep the north

4) US$1.5b = AU$2.3b which I believe was roughly what was thrown around at the last AGM. That equates to around AU$0.66c a share. Perhaps this is why Jens is throwing low-ball posts out on X.

I’d be filthy if this was the case. Royalties from KoBold would have to more than match fair value given its future earnings, and compensation for the north would have to be at least US$1.5b on top of the other offers.

We know when AVZ challenged Jin Cheng’s purchase of 15% of Dathcom in the ICC, Zijin themselves put a value on our project of US$5.6b. That’s AU$2.45 per share and that’s before the resource increased by 47% to 842Mt.

And any compensation for the north would have to come originally from Zijin and would have to be guaranteed because we know they are corrupt liars.

As far as KoBold goes, we know they’re not miners so I’m expecting they will form a joint venture with Rio Tinto.

Thats why I believe shareholders shouldn’t accept any low-ball offers. The DRC are desperate for security against Rwanda backed M23 rebels, KoBold is desperate for Manono and the US is desperate for DRC critical minerals. The only ones who shouldn’t be desperate now are us, we’ve waited three years for this ICSID case to start and now we’re only 18 days away

I know others might disagree, the above are just my opinions based on what I’ve read and the fact I don’t have 53million shares to accept a low-ball offer
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 46 users
Just to add to what @Carlos Danger said, I believe the US previously said they were putting sanctions on CATL for supplying critical minerals to China’s military

The other comments I’ve been holding onto and struggling not to put out there are that from all the information put out by KoBold, Bloomberg, Reuters, The Australian and nearly every other media source and announcement I’ve read, I wouldn’t be surprised if

1) AVZ has already stuck the deal with KoBold

2) They’re waiting for the fat fuckwit to say he will grant the ML to KoBold (and he’s waiting for AVZ to drop arbitration)

3) As posted (then deleted) in The Australian newspaper…. KoBold offering US$1.5b plus royalties and compensation for the north. I believe The Australian was the first media source to mention that Zijin keep the north

4) US$1.5b = AU$2.3b which I believe was roughly what was thrown around at the last AGM. That equates to around AU$0.66c a share. Perhaps this is why Jens is throwing low-ball posts out on X.

I’d be filthy if this was the case. Royalties from KoBold would have to more than match fair value given its future earnings, and compensation for the north would have to be at least US$1b on top of the other offers.

We know when AVZ challenged Jin Cheng’s purchase of 15% of Dathcom in the ICC, Zijin themselves put a value on our project of US$5.6b

And any compensation for the north would have to come originally from Zijin and would have to be guaranteed because we know they are corrupt liars.

As far as KoBold goes, we know they’re not miners so I’m expecting they will form a joint venture with Rio Tinto.

Thats why I believe shareholders shouldn’t accept any low-ball offers. The DRC are desperate for security against Rwanda backed M23 rebels, KoBold is desperate for Manono and the US is desperate for DRC critical minerals. The only ones who shouldn’t be desperate now are us, we’ve waited three years for this ICSID case to start and now we’re only two weeks away

I know others might disagree, the above are just my opinions based on what I’ve researched and the fact I don’t have 53million shares to accept a low-ball offer

I know any opinions shared here ultimately probably won't mean shit, and I do trust that management will get the best outcome they can possibly get.

That being said $0.66c is crap. Given that as you put it, Zijin put a value of US $5.6B, and AVZ in total put US $10B, and August Cohen on X stating he thought fair value to AVZ would be US$5-7.5B.... to end up with US$1.5B or $0.66c would be getting completely shafted.
I would like to think that when Kobold say 'fair value' in their release they actually mean fair value, they know the value of the resource and have the pockets to pay up. But the voices of some prominent SHs seem to suggest to prepare for a lower buyout.

Mixed feelings atm. I can't wait for this shit to be over, but man $0.66c... to me fair value is like 3x that at least, circa $2+

gltah
 
  • Like
Reactions: 23 users

Spikerama

Regular
I know any opinions shared here ultimately probably won't mean shit, and I do trust that management will get the best outcome they can possibly get.

That being said $0.66c is crap. Given that as you put it, Zijin put a value of US $5.6B, and AVZ in total put US $10B, and August Cohen on X stating he thought fair value to AVZ would be US$5-7.5B.... to end up with US$1.5B or $0.66c would be getting completely shafted.
I would like to think that when Kobold say 'fair value' in their release they actually mean fair value, they know the value of the resource and have the pockets to pay up. But the voices of some prominent SHs seem to suggest to prepare for a lower buyout.

Mixed feelings atm. I can't wait for this shit to be over, but man $0.66c... to me fair value is like 3x that at least, circa $2+

gltah

For fuck sake. Stop quoting fucking prices!!!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 11 users

Dijon101

Regular
It's like people don't know insurance companies initially reject all claims as a company policy because 30% of people with a legitimate claim are too lazy to go after what they are owed..

With insurance companies their first offer is $0


YOU NEVER ACCEPT THE FIRST OFFER.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11 users

Pokok

Regular
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

DiscoDanNZ

Regular
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Top Bottom