America are going ahead with the minerals for Security deal. Investment is going into Africa. Kobold are the first off the rung (most connected), cherry picking the best bits from the carcass so to speak. Don't conflate US minerals for security to mean Kobold are the only investor (there will be lots and lots). It is only BECAUSE of the US involvement that this oppurtunity has now emerged for Kobold (or they are the architects of it, one of many). If the kobold deal does not go ahead, the US does not scrap the security for minerals deal, it continues (again there is TRILLIONS of mineral wealth in Africa). There are many countries, many other minerals and probably many other sources of lithium available in Africa, ripe for the picking unexplored. As the demand for lithium grows this mammoth source of 669MT will be sitting idle not generating tax (bad for DRC so they can issue an ML for us at any time or we can keep going through courts - a deal is better than courts). More offers will come off the back of the minerals for security deal UNLESS Kobold can lock this up now.
That said I obviously prefer a sale to Kobold but I am not going to let it be stolen (if I can help it at all)... I'll speculate here on the value of the project, I am not posting SP predictions or attacking anyone (on social media) and don't think that helps any. Right now its a wait and see how the deal takes shape, gotta give management room to operate.
Indeed there will be lots of other US investors in the DRC, but those US investors interested in Manono have already shown themselves.
Everyone who needs to know about Manono, knows about Manono, there's no one still asleep that will wake up next month and come to outbid Kobald.
The players are all at the table.
The Government needs US security for the sake of National security, and as part of that deal, Manono must only go to the US, so China is out, and they apparently already have the North so they can't really cry "unfair".
Your post sounds exciting and promising in terms of AVZ securing a great price, but none of your claims appear to have and relevance to our situation. I mean no offence to you Skar, and I'd welcome anyone to refute what I'm saying or show my where my error lies.
I've stated before that ISCID is a suicide vest option, it's leverage, and we can hurt them if they screw us.
All they need to do is offer us something that would be a better outcome than going through with 5-10 years of legal BS (that we are not yet fully funded for) followed by years of manouvering to attempt to get some of the moneys back.
ISCID is one step above a complete loss for us.
We are not holding the cards as some claim, we have one card, and fortunately great management and Legals.