AVZ Discussion 2022

[hedrox]

I think we should bite our tongues for the moment and not get too emotional about it all...it doesn't help. Negotiations are on the way and I think we should be a bit more wise.....we are so close...dont fuck it up now and safe your pineapples for later...IMO

 

[cruiser51]

I think we should bite our tongues for the moment and not get too emotional about it all...it doesn't help. Negotiations are on the way and I think we should be a bit more wise.....we are so close...dont fuck it up now and safe your pineapples for later...IMO

Hear, hear.

 

[Mr Inappropriate]

Everyone posting it’s worth $2 per share…. Fuck that. I want more. Way more for this resource and the illegal bullshit we’ve been through. Court rulings will be in AVZ favour and that’s $10b USD minimum (~$A4.30ish per share). $2 is a pisstake if true.

Yep, this thing is worth a fuck-tonne to whomever takes it through to production.

 

[wombat74]

Hope Felix gives us a reduced Tax bill . I believe it's one of the things Nigel hopes to negotiate . Could save share holder a lot of $$$ .

 

[Samus]

Think strategically. This isn’t about calling out corrupt actors and their feelings it’s the political optics of the USA investing into a country that has ingrained corruption. Similar but not the same.

Yes everyone knows the DRC is corrupt but there historically hasn’t been a constant barrage of social media warriors working their beautiful magic calling it out at every chance they can get (not saying it’s a bad thing and I’ve done my fair share too!). But at the pointy end all the big dog players (partially the USA!) will want to spin this as a winning move forward, building trusting and long lasting partnerships for joint economic growth blah blah blah. The usual political spin…

However, if every media release or policy commentary is hijacked by corruption call outs it would just provide an easy win for anyone who is against these partnerships (such as China and its growing “behind the scenes” media influence or anti trump activists) to leverage and build a narrative to divide, cause unrest and possibly influence future investment decisions. Future Spitballing but maybe like these over the top ESG (such as net zero) commitments companies have been pressured into by shareholders when making investments… but with maybe investments in corruption Instead? Dunno.

Anyways no idea what I’m trying to say just a various thoughts on the processes and messages by those who might be ITK. Probably safer to relax then ramp up the the anti-corruption campaign at this point in time. Let’s play it out.

$12 for balance on my post.

Makes sense, to be honest what I really object to is when Jens says for the umpteenth time to be respectful because negotiations are happening and I just think fuck off bullshit artist! And it makes me want to do the opposite.
We've heard it all before, it was the 'pointy end' years ago. I've had an absolute gut full, let's hope something actually is happening but if not ICSID 'is' happening and that's the one thing we know for sure. Then they'll either have to make a deal or slowly have their assets stripped to pay us out.
There is always so much hearsay going around but I'm just keeping in mind that all of it to date has proven to be absolute fucking bullshit.

 

[wombat74]

Unlike some I don't think this security /peace deal is the catalyst for getting a deal for a 1 Billion + tone high grade Lithium deposit over the line . The United States are quite capable of protecting their strategic assets where ever they may be .

 

[Frank]

Yep, this thing is worth a fuck-tonne to whomever takes it through to production.

https://x.com/lithiumanalysis/status/1919322236265156807

 

[j19]

Unlike some I don't think this security /peace deal is the catalyst for getting a deal for a 1 Billion + tone high grade Lithium deposit over the line . The United States are quite capable of protecting their strategic assets where ever they may be .

The fact that USA is capable of protecting assets is the whole point. Minerals for security.

If the DRC just give priority access to the minerals to USA without the minerals for security deal, then what leverage would the DRC have to entice USA to provide security to stop what M23 is doing, stealing minerals from the DRC mines in the East?