9cardomaha
Regular
9Card approved nip to tit ratio.
AVZ Discussion 2022
- Thread starter GazDix
- Start date
9Card approved nip to tit ratio.
someone's jumping at shadows, we've hit a new level
but yeah, I wondered who was getting all butt hurt with the amount of mods I got, well I didnt wonder much
On topic, Did anyone happen to ask the board roughly what percentage chance they think we have of obtaining a ML before delisting date, or perhaps roughly what percentage chance we have of appeasing the criteria needed to list before that date, and exactly what the board knows that criteria is from a governance perspective and a management perspective?
Again with the delisting garbage....... Do a search and educate yourself.
CDK222
Member
Did anyone take note of the guy who walked in with headphones and complained about turning off his phone. He was then engaged with one of the hostess about 10 min in regarding his phone being on. He was sitting behind the slimy lawyer in 3rd row and appeared to ask a question which followed on for the lawyers line of questioning??
He was writing a shot load of notes and gave off ‘journo’ vibes!!! Will be interesting to see if any publication writes about the content of the AGM
He was writing a shot load of notes and gave off ‘journo’ vibes!!! Will be interesting to see if any publication writes about the content of the AGM
Surprised they got so many. Weak cunts who ever voted for them.
Waiting for a TSE member update, but I hope there was more to it than this.
How close are we on an MOU?
Did we pay Marius, and what did we get for it?
Is Felix on board or not?
Is the current BoD supported by CATH, and if not what's the plan re: the 24%?
I'm more interested in what happens next than what happens to the MMGA arseholes.
Hodlandwin69
Regular
It was the Chinese entities. Tbh I thought it would be closer.
Can't have been anyone from the AFR if they gave off journo vibes.
Samus
Top 20
We got betrayed by Mr pee pees.
I was in the same row. He was passing me when he started turning on the drama about his phone.
He is a LTH. I have spoken to him at length at a previous major shareholders event.
I was surprised to see him "passing notes" with the MMGA lawyer. And even more surprised by the question he asked re due diligence around Locke, which seemed to demonstrate a complete misunderstanding of the situation. And Nigel called him on it nicely.
I don't think he's a journo, but I could have that wrong. Wouldn't be the first time haha. I guess if Tom Richardson can be called a journo it's not setting the bar very high.
exactly, surely not everyone was sidetracked by the MMGA saga
Chilla
Regular
They would never discuss those items at the AGM which was primarily dealing with an existential threat to the assets of the company by the Chinese attempting a board coup. You don’t open the hen house to let the wolves have a massacre.
Whilst we are frustrated and devoid of lots of information….that information is extremely sensitive and is being sought by the corrupt Chinese to use against us and steal our asset.
You need to understand when it’s appropriate to ask certain questions and when it’s not. This is not that time.
Carlos Danger
Top 20
A bloke up the front on the left asked about this. (poor guy, it took him about four goes to get his first question in - "sorry sir that question is not applicable to this section of the meeting" - added a bit of comic relief to the proceedings at least).
Anyway, where was I?
Yes, the question was asked and the response from what I recall was a standard Nigel vague answer along the lines of "yes we are looking into cost cutting measures wherever available" or something to that effect.
From memory (yes that thing again), the question was bundled in with a remuneration question as well so there was a pre-scripted part to the answer. It was along the lines of stuff we've already heard about cash bonuses to compensate for spending lots of time abroad.
There certainly wasn't any talk of executive pay cuts.
Maybe just going back to Blend 43...
They was my recollection - they all sat at about 33 for, 66 against.
And the board was all pretty comfortable except for JC who was only borderline for.
you're right, unless of course we lose in court and dont regain our asset, obviously we all hope it doesnt get to that
even if we win, well, lets see how this chinese owned jungle reacts to that in relation to what happens on the ground, these dirty dogs have been relentless so far and I'd imagine we'll need some decent dollars alloted to security of a mine and personnel
Last edited:
The attacks will only cease when you refuse to let it rile you. It's only really a handful anyway. Consider them unreconstructed bogans with all the gravitas of girly TicTockers and led by a schizophrenic sock-puppet. Works for me.agreed, would love nothing more when the attacks cease
Good questions from the other Nut......but not necessarily to be answered at this particular time
Time now is to consolidate the respects and wishes of the AVZ shareholders as indicated by the voting at the AGM
And by the way .....#FuckMMGA..... right up the fucking arse
Glad I didn't go then. All we need to know is the results of resolution voting if they are going to tell us SFA about the actual operations of the business I part own and what our employees have been doing for a few years until I eventually find out whether it's worth anything in the end.
I'd like to know when they can be answered.
Carlos Danger
Top 20
Similar threads
