TDITD
Top 20
I shall be when AVZ are back on board. Until then it's MMGA flyersPro tip use a 100
I shall be when AVZ are back on board. Until then it's MMGA flyersPro tip use a 100
They are not worth anything mate so expect a even funnier lookI shall be when AVZ are back on board. Until then it's MMGA flyers
Think before you post, before you make an absolute fool of yourself.We’re all human man some of us make errors of judgement.
So i can confirm Katamba is refurbing the hydroplant. It is the typical DRC operational model, where everyone disagrees to the ownership of some asset, and Cominiere just does whatever the fuck they want........
In reality, I don't see an issue with Cominiere and Zijin jumping the gun and starting on the refurbishment - the entire issue is a line of dominoes in my view.
After we win the jurisdictional ICC challenge, all the other ones with ZJ then get withdrawn (Confirmed withdrawal if Arbitrator rules in our favour), i'd say we follow up to provide irrevocable evidence on collusion between Cominiere and Zijin.
All their fucking JVs imploding would be the next step i think (with the icc case, the evidence for collusion cannot be ignored). Then we just legally reclaim the hydroplant with whatever halfassed refurb those cunts already did.
Nagging in the back of my mind similar to the split for north, but its all irrelevant and just more noise to distract from the actual first domino.
That particular thread on X is good Frank as DRC Franck explains that Rose wasn't happy either with certain IGF recommendations not being followed in regards to their Cominiere investigation and spoke out about it, another good sign for us AVZ sufferers.
'Sorry Nigel, but I'll have to press you for an answer"I have a gripe with the AGM, when a question gets asked by a shareholder and its not answered close to adequately (as we all know they all like to do) then FFS the next question has to be a follow up on the same question that was 'dodged'.
It boils my piss that we let the directors off the hook so consistently at these AGMs (not just AVZ). Us shareholders need to act more in unison.
Ok back to shitting on faces in safe spaces and spicy language ...
More photos of the HEPP upgrade.
Mpiana Mwanga has nothing to do with the Dathcom JVA and work on it isn't subject to the ICC emergency order against Cominiere.
$AVZ @KiengeKki @FranckFwamba
@cominiereSA now shows all its new violation of the ICC injunction by Cominiere and #Zijin
@SE_ROSEMUTOMBO
Mpiana Mwanga has nothing to do with the Dathcom JVA and work on it isn't subject to the ICC emergency order against Cominiere
Who has control of the plant is a question of whether the 30 year period of validity lapsed and if the asset was returned to the Congolese state from Cominiere and then given to AVZ Power
View attachment 47346
View attachment 47347
Got it, thanksMpiana Mwanga has nothing to do with the Dathcom JVA and work on it isn't subject to the ICC emergency order against Cominiere
Who has control of the plant is a question of whether the 30 year period of validity lapsed and if the asset was returned to the Congolese state from Cominiere before being given to AVZ Power
View attachment 47346
View attachment 47347
Yes unfortunately it would seem so. Although this time we have a government minister on our side and Cominiere were dumb enough to join the committee for the refurbishment after not objecting to AVZ Power having the asset for over a year. Knowing CKK he probably still hasn't officially objected. Most likely we will need to pursue this within the DRC court system imo
Very interesting indeed. So to clarify. All of us here feel this bonus is way off the mark if there is not an ML in place? Is anyone in favour of the bonus without an ML? and if so why? (Sincere question) Can we as shareholders present a unified front in saying a hard NO to the performance bonus and if we do and he goes ahead and awards it to himself where does this leave us? Food for thought.Nigel will be questioned about this at the AGM. I hope you're attending and will be asking him yourself since you're so passionate about it. Or are you hoping someone else will bother for you?
At your level of rage I'd hope to see you front and center with the question, otherwise, what right do you have to come in here raging so hard?
I think everyone wants an answer to this question and is equally fully sus about it.
I can't imagine the audacity of him taking this bonus if he didn't expect to have the ML by the time AGM comes around.
I'm against a bonus full stop. Made that clear immediately. There are still plenty of performance rights on the table if ML is delivered soon. No fucking way do any of them deserve extra cash even if we started trading again tomorrow at all time highs.Very interesting indeed. So to clarify. All of us here feel this bonus is way off the mark if there is not an ML in place? Is anyone in favour of the bonus without an ML? and if so why? (Sincere question) Can we as shareholders present a unified front in saying a hard NO to the performance bonus and if we do and he goes ahead and awards it to himself where does this leave us? Food for thought.