A couple of points worth discussing:That's what I believe it could be used as, irrespective of what CATH's motives were at the the time of the agreement.
Don't forget that we are dealing with a totalitarian state.
I too have posed this question to holders in private. Nothing is stopping CCP from threatening to essentially take away CATLs business in the homeland and handing it to loyalists, therefore possibly fatally injuring CATL.That's what I believe it could be used as, irrespective of what CATH's motives were at the the time of the agreement.
Don't forget that we are dealing with a totalitarian state.
This point exactly - CPC can dictate what CATH must do with 24% and what ZJ must do, which are all detrimental to CATH's domestic plans.I too have posed this question to holders in private. Nothing is stopping CCP from threatening to essentially take away CATLs business in the homeland and handing it to loyalists, therefore possibly fatally injuring CATL.
CATL have maybe been genuine all along but if China.inc comes calling their loyalties will be clear. IMO.
It's then what China.inc want ? Happy with 24% and 1st option on lithium feed, or do they want a hostile TO ?
Let's say at the end of the day it is the Chinese Communist Party which pulls the strings in the background.So do we officially call CATH a Trojan Horse, or is that taking it a bit far?
@Carlos Danger is the 10% to the State a part of the DATHCOM JVA or Mining Code (or both)?
Anyone, has the twitter feed ref AVZ gone extra quiet, or is it just my feed?
Dathcom need to cede 10% to the DRC government under Article 71 (d) of the mining codeis the 10% to the State a part of the DATHCOM JVA or Mining Code (or both)?
Looks very much like the US version of Chinas BRI............but better.Facts, not fiction, speculation or paranoia
Lobito rail corridor to DRC border
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing...frastructure-and-investment-at-the-g7-summit/
And this is me, Xerof. Pronouns I/me
Welcome back Money.......@zeeb0t
I am aware that you are a BRN shareholder and that it was the BRN supporters who set up The Stock Exchange Forum as a result of the trolling and lack of support from moderators on the hot crapper forum. I also am a BRN shareholder and realise that you and the others have a great deal of knowledge relating to AI. As I have been so committed to supporting the success of AVZ, I have have to completely overlooked what is happening on BRN and I have had to occasionally sell some of my BRN shares just to support myself.
Like other BRN holders I have been frustrated by what has happened with the company's share price and I understand fully the disappointment of not selling at $2, however (like you) I have great faith in the company and realise that like AVZ, patience is often the only way to move forward. I don't know how BRN is travelling at the moment because as I have said, I spend all my time focusing on AVZ, but I am no small shareholder in BRN, having 200,000 shares.
I needed to relate this to you, because I believe that this may help you understand what is going on in this forum. If you read the room properly you would realise that long term AVZ holders and contributors to this forum are getting 20 or more 'likes' per post and Der Geist and John Reed are lucky to get any. This is so obvious and it is not the result of a tribal mentality as they claim, these are genuine contributors - shareholder's concerns and frustration at your lack of seeing what has happened here.
For God's sake, surely you can see what has happened and continuing to happen!! Long term contributors, dedicated to AVZ's success are being undermined and you don't seem to realise. I am not sure if this is because you are focused on BRN and trading other stocks…. But you must surely realise what happened to you and all the other BRN holders, also happened to AVZ on hot crapper, and is now happening to AVZ on TSE.
I have read your comments on our thread, and I realise it takes 5 members to report a post and have it removed, which leads me to the conclusion that there are at least 5 trolls here working together!!!!!
As you have moderated me again a week ago, and prevented me from accessing my MoneyBags1348 account as well as preventing me from posting comments for the last week, I have still managed to carry out research and speak with other shareholders outside this forum. I also received an email from Ben Cohen (AVZ Joint Secretary) which I wanted to post on the thread but couldn't.
The tone of the email from Ben (which I will add to this post) does not in any way support the cryptic comments and speculations being put forward by wombat74 and der geist some of which are below:
wombat74 posts:
My spies also informed me dathomir is out
So maybe there is some truth to some of it
Nigel and crew are back in the DRC I believe
My source is in every way unrelated to an AVZ source
Der Geist replied with:
Wombat74 a long term holder in AVZ saw it as positive as well. But nothing is set as you know.
Think about it. If it feels like inadequate context, then ask the question ask the question ask the question. But don’t flame, when you can ask. Wombat74 accepted it as valid - I think you could apologise for thinking you can be nasty, yes? You also ignored my April 30 2022 RCCM discovery, didn’t you! Yes? Whose fault is that? Context within context, means do not bitch to me about seemingly trying to be enigmatic. This journo was mentioned earlier:
I have a lot of confidence the journo knows how to analyse complexity and you would too upon knowing who. Well even shareholders here can fill in the gaps.
The journo is very experienced, is on the ground in Kinshasa. And if I did a grading ( AVZ is the most certain, and this is from someone in Kinshasa now and not connected to AVZ at all. I wish I had more to offer, perhaps soon. I may join JR’s 2023 thread with anything Material
A little more definition emerging independent journalism in Kinshasa and @Dijon101 ‘s Uber are on the similar page at this point
I notice der geist and john reed also post numerous comments for shareholders to contact both Bloomberg as well as www.aspistrategist.org.au which I'm not suggesting is suspicious, I am just drawing your attention to it
Including
@Roon this might be for you.Direct message me if interested![]()
Submissions | The Strategist
The Strategist style guide is available here (PDF). We welcome submissions of around 800 words of original analysis, book reviews, statistics or graphs related to defence, security and strategic policy. Please email us at editors@aspi.org.au We’ll accept longer pieces on a ...www.aspistrategist.org.au
We should get good coverage from Bloomberg as their Journalists covering this are well connected to Global Witness and CongoHoldup teams and other links beyond my scoping. Bloomberg has not done a piece on it since May 23 2022. I’m thinking why doesn’t Tom go to Kinshasa and be a real journalist?
Why don’t you email ASPI and let them know your Chinese interference theory?
After reading der geist's post to you on the forum today, my opinion is they continue to try and influence you and AVZ shareholders with mock sincerity while they carry out an agenda and refer to the majority here as tribal and 'herd' like. I simply ask you to look at the number of impassioned responses to and by shareholders who have been long term contributors trying hard to support AVZ, and while you are at it, ask why they have stopped posting.
It's not hard to see, please consider how you would react if you were an AVZ shareholder , counting the number of responses since the two members referred to joined this forum
Fortunately I have conversations outside of this forum with @Frank @Sammael @Winenut @JAG @cruiser51 and others whose phone numbers and emails I have. I'm not here to fuck around, I've got nearly 3million shares in AVZ and I still correspond directly with the company.
I edited some of Ben's reply to me as it related to specific questions I asked him. I had plenty more to say, but to be honest mate, I think I've finally had enough of the fucken bullshit here, maybe I will PM you who I think the trolls are, but at this stage you probably wouldn't take my opinions on board and I don't think I really give a shit anymore.
MoneyBags
View attachment 37027
Don't know XDoes anyone know if Michael J Kavanagh, an experienced journalist, who works for Bloomberg, and seems to write quite a number of articles about DRC matters, is on the ground in Kinshasa?
Asking for a friend who noticed that Sir Les DG, JR, ES etc etchas tweeted him suggesting he write an op-ed on the DATHCOM imbroglio
* I Concur, Ditto Wino, well saidIt's probably a tough gig and a fine line to negotiate so thank you for your efforts @zeeb0t in providing the best and most decent forum you possibly can for people to connect and share their AVZ information with that all important human and personal touch
Cheers!
Wtf wait did we all get our Money back somehow ? Fuxk I need to log in to Westpac app this is breaking news….Welcome back Money.......![]()
*Fyi,Don't know X
But I'm going to do some digging and see what turns up ....
Dathcom need to cede 10% to the DRC government under Article 71 (d) of the mining code
View attachment 37043
Cominiere are committed to being the party within Dathcom to cede the 10% to the DRC government under Article 5.1 (i) of the Dathcom JVA
View attachment 37046
View attachment 37047
It would seem so. There's certainly no question that 10% needs to go to the DRC government in the mining code. Cominiere's commitment doesn't specify a percentage. It requires them to 'comply with an obligation resulting from the law then applicable' and 'transfer free of charge to the DRC part of its participation in Dathcom'. Neither AVZ or Dathomir have this listed in their commitments in the JVA.Thanks Carlos, so as tight as two coats of paint.
Regarding the joint case and ICC request that was submitted, peeps who want a gander hit me up on PM. Unfortunately still gonna slightly gatekeep and not just pump and dump it like DG's mum/sister.To Infinity & Beyond![]()
*Fyi,
Kin-Beijing cooperation: "Why is President Felix Tshisekedi going to China?
Congolese President Felix Tshisekedi will travel to China for the first time at the end of May to renegotiate the mining contracts signed by his predecessor for a total amount of 6.2 billion dollars.
Business is business.
The Congolese President wants a rebalancing of certain contracts with Beijing and will therefore travel to China to negotiate next week, reports Agence Congolaise de Presse.
Felix Tshisekedi is particularly targeting the mineral-for-infrastructure contract signed by former President Joseph Kabila in 2008.
It would be the Congolese leader's first visit to the Middle Kingdom, according to Bloomberg.
The $6.2 billion deal sees Chinese state-owned companies fund infrastructure projects using proceeds from a copper and cobalt mine.
But Felix Tshisekedi had already criticized its content in recent months, telling Bloomberg that it was "poorly written" and that the DRC derived "no benefit" from it.
In February, the Congolese General Inspectorate of Finance (IGF) for its part denounced "a disproportionate collaboration" to the detriment of the country, deploring that Chinese investors have only mobilized 822 million in financing in 14 years.
Kinshasa therefore hopes for a rebalancing to really make the agreement win-win.
"The objective is to consolidate and further expand Sino-Congolese cooperation based on sound foundations guaranteeing the principle of mutual respect, fairness and transparency beneficial to both the Congolese people and the Chinese people. "said government spokesman Patrick Muyaya on state television.
Towards an agreement between Gécamines and CMOC
The DRC is also negotiating a definitive agreement with the Chinese CMOC Group, reports Bloomberg.
The latter is in conflict with the Congolese state company Gécamines, over the Tenke Fungurume copper and cobalt mine.
Exports were halted last June as Gécamines claims CMOC owes billions in royalties.
The two companies are close to reaching a resolution, but have not yet signed a final agreement, Gecamines Chairman Guy-Robert Lukama told Bloomberg.
China remains the DRC's biggest trading partner, with the two nations trading 21.7 billion in 2022, according to data compiled by the US media.
China is the main destination for Congolese copper and cobalt, key minerals for the design of electric car batteries.
The country also produces 70% of the world's cobalt.
mediacongo