That's great!He is still in the DRC
Could it be:Pleased to see it was just a typo, though that's typically sloppy of our comms people. That should have been caught. Anyway, that's one bit of easement.
Two points of interest I've picked out of this announcement. The first is how Zijin/JC's case and effort to win their way into the project is described - which basically puts to bed for me that the company have any intention for now of entering into a settlement with Zijin.
The second is a point of confusion regarding the bifurcated Zijin ICC arbitration
View attachment 32778
Here it states that if the first challenge wins out, then Jin Cheng don't have the right to institute arbitration at the ICC against us due to non involvement in the JVA. It however says that this wouldn't determine whether the sale by Cominiere was effective which must be determined in another separate proceeding. Wouldn't success in the first challenge remove the ability for a second ICC hearing to be held on whether the sale of shares was actually legit?
Does this mean a different kind of proceedings would be required? Where would they happen, DRC courts? That's not ideal for us, we can't win in that corrupt environment. With the dathomir case we ignored DRC court rulings as lacking jurisdiction but if its determined that JC aren't in the JVA, where would jurisdiction be? Would this require us starting a separate ICC case against Cominiere to determine the legitimacy of the transfer, given they ARE in the JVA?
Colour me confused. Anyone got any thoughts? I'm probably over complicating this in my head but to me it doesn't add up as explained in this announcement.
Fuk Hoots, fukkin wanker really showed his colours.Holy crap I was actually right about a speculation for once!
Isn't that nice
Oh and thank god that wasn't true.
Also to Hoots on the crapper, WRONG BIATCH!![]()
I have stress every dayWinking, not wanking, a lot can be a sign of stress.
If I wink a lot it is not a sign of impending news, but simply pollen.
And I thought you were simply a winker.I have stress every day
and a thinker or was that drinkerAnd I thought you were simply a winker.
Does this mean a different kind of proceedings would be required? Where would they happen, DRC courts? That's not ideal for us, we can't win in that corrupt environment. With the dathomir case we ignored DRC court rulings as lacking jurisdiction but if its determined that JC aren't in the JVA, where would jurisdiction be? Would this require us starting a separate ICC case against Cominiere to determine the legitimacy of the transfer, given they ARE in the JVA?
Colour me confused. Anyone got any thoughts? I'm probably over complicating this in my head but to me it doesn't add up as explained in this announcement.
If only these announcements were made when we were trading.......... The share price would have ..........up up and away![]()
$12 is a fucking bargain.I love that AVZ are still publishing these unbelievable drill results. Showing total arrogance towards the naysayers and crooks. When all the corruption is behind us we will fly!
I just wish some of you investors knew what you're talking about but sadly you don't. Let me be clear we are in good hands what's more I sleep well at nightIt's a pretty good game plan from the Chinese really. Not the first rodeo. I think it's pretty clear they intend to do whatever they can to hold up the development of Manono until there's no more willingness on the government's part to let it drag on any longer. And then use their corrupt subverted Ministers and other high-level figures to slide it towards Chinese interests alone, spreading bags and whispering in the ear of the top guys that AVZ don't have the experience, funding or technical capability to pull it off, but the Chinese do, and suggesting we are only holding it up as speculators in any case. With undoubted support of the Chinese government in the form of the ambassador making promises of infrastructure and military aid, alongside perhaps tying it also to support for their battery production plant plans. Could CATL/CATH be hedging their bets with a foot in each camp?
So there's a question around this next ICC hearing. Given that's its only hearing half the case (broken into two separate parts at our request), the first is to find out whether the ICC has jurisdiction because Jin Cheng don't form part of the JV. If we happen to win that and the second part (whether the Cominiere-Zijin sale was legitimate) doesn't get heard, does that mean the ownership dispute remains unresolved? Or does that essentially win both elements of the case? Because I can't see Zijin just fading into the distance should it be decided that there is no grounding for the case to be heard at the ICC.
Not nitpicking imo - its not a bad piece of news, however its another opportunity for Chinese whispers or intentional disinformation to be conveyed to FT. I would be much happier if he viewed the happenings with his own eyeballs instead. Still, at least there seems to be some action.
Fucking sell it to him FFS, none of those pissant ministers are going to fuck around with a major. They can only get away with it because it's AVZ.
Edit: anyway I'm not posting much because I'm going through a dark patch too. Comes and goes. BRB when I'm feeling more optimistic.
And rainbow daisy was a fucking wierdo of the highest order with tranny avatars and with cryptic lingo worse than Der Geist