Out of curiosity do we have any idea what that bit of CL we do have our hands on could be worth if by some chance we don't get the rest of it ?13359 does not appear as 2 parcels. It has been clipped back to cover RD and the bit of CL that has had the drill into it. The other piece remains to this day unallocated, without a tenement number. BUT, I keep referring people to what AVZ have said
An area which was excluded under the Ministerial Decree to award the Mining Licence, will be renewed under a 5-year Exploration Licence to Dathcom, with discussions regarding the terms of the ongoing joint venture under discussion with the DRC Government
Not sure what it's worth but we have pretty much all of itOut of curiosity do we have any idea what that bit of CL we do have our hands on could be worth if by some chance we don't get the rest of it ?
I agree with you Bin, but focusing discussions around specific areas (like ownership) has allowed you, Obe and Xerof (to name a few) to provide specific, valuable and targeted information that gives us a better understanding of one area management is dealing with, which I find useful and essential, and I would rather be posing these types of questions to management than less relevant ones, even though I know they aren’t going to let me know what they are up to PS I appreciate your replies to my comments!“I do wish other investors would put more effort into researching the facts and possibilities and offer strategies that help Nigel and us all as shareholders”
Hi MoneyBags, I appreciate your comments but without being privy to all the facts & information wouldn’t it be almost impossible for shareholders to try to work out strategies for the company, especially when out of necessity they’re holding their cards so close to their chest. I’m sure they / the board & legal team have varying strategies on the table for the different possible scenarios.
For what it’s worth, when I saw the 13359 tenement appearing as two parcels I did wonder if the the CL project (on the split tenement) might be progressed at the same time, by bringing on another “actor” in to ensure both projects are advanced in a timely manner.
ASX announcement 4/5/2022, regarding the split tenement (The surface rights only have to be paid over the area covered by the mining license):“I do wish other investors would put more effort into researching the facts and possibilities and offer strategies that help Nigel and us all as shareholders”
Hi MoneyBags, I appreciate your comments but without being privy to all the facts & information wouldn’t it be almost impossible for shareholders to try to work out strategies for the company, especially when out of necessity they’re holding their cards so close to their chest. I’m sure they / the board & legal team have varying strategies on the table for the different possible scenarios.
For what it’s worth, when I saw the 13359 tenement appearing as two parcels I did wonder if the the CL project (on the split tenement) might be progressed at the same time, by bringing on another “actor” in to ensure both projects are advanced in a timely manner.
I'm thinking about taking up archery . It might come in handy .Can't be said enough that it would be very fucking nice to have some clarity around something. Even something as little as why exactly we're in suspension.
And if anybody tells me it's because of: 'The voluntary suspension is requested in connection with the finalisation and release of an announcement in relation to its mining and exploration rights for the Manono Lithium and Tin Project.'
Well I'm liable to wring their neck at this point, got that management?
Suspect another months sufferance though tbh.
And we can all repeat the same speculation we forgot we said last month (again) and digest a few more bs articles (again).
Maybe I'll take up yoga.
it's because of: 'The voluntary suspension is requested in connection with the finalisation and release of an announcement in relation to its mining and exploration rights for the Manono Lithium and Tin Project.'Can't be said enough that it would be very fucking nice to have some clarity around something. Even something as little as why exactly we're in suspension.
And if anybody tells me it's because of: 'The voluntary suspension is requested in connection with the finalisation and release of an announcement in relation to its mining and exploration rights for the Manono Lithium and Tin Project.'
Well I'm liable to wring their neck at this point, got that management?
Suspect another months sufferance though tbh.
And we can all repeat the same speculation we forgot we said last month (again) and digest a few more bs articles (again).
Maybe I'll take up yoga.
Not that $20mil is all that much considering what is at stake, but you and Cruiser should remember that whoever breaks the TIA has to pay a break fee of $20mil. Personally I would be looking elsewhere to another battery manufacturer (or trying to amend the terms to 19%, AVZ keeping an extra 5%) but CAT is the world’s biggest battery manufacturer, I imagine the DRC is looking to them to build the facility near Manono, and I also imagine that CAT doesn’t even want to build it there as they have already spent billions building battery manufacturing plants in Yibin and elsewhere in China. I also wouldn’t be surprised if CATH are happy to just pay as little as they can for the offtake, partly meaning that they would be happy not building a battery manufacturing plant in the DRC and just expect AVZ to pay all freight, insurance and other costs to get the products to China. I don’t know how many here consider all the possibilities involved (these are just a few I consider) but I have close to 3 million shares in AVZ so I try to imagine what possibilities might affect my investment. Maybe this is a little too much information, but fuck it, I can tell you from my conversations with Nigel in Sydney, I have invested more of my own money in AVZ than he had. I’m not dirty on him having all his shares, he’s done all the work, but I do wish other investors would put more effort into researching the facts and possibilities and offer strategies that help Nigel and us all as shareholders
Sounds like you need a snack or something mateCan't be said enough that it would be very fucking nice to have some clarity around something. Even something as little as why exactly we're in suspension.
And if anybody tells me it's because of: 'The voluntary suspension is requested in connection with the finalisation and release of an announcement in relation to its mining and exploration rights for the Manono Lithium and Tin Project.'
Well I'm liable to wring their neck at this point, got that management?
Suspect another months sufferance though tbh.
And we can all repeat the same speculation we forgot we said last month (again) and digest a few more bs articles (again).
Maybe I'll take up yoga.
The trick is to be so mental that you don't even realise you've snapped.Ok ... I think I’ve snapped
View attachment 10411
Oi if we are handing out 'snacks' I'll be needing a lin....I mean a snack tooSounds like you need a snack or something mate
You are lucky Sammy can't swimit's because of: 'The voluntary suspension is requested in connection with the finalisation and release of an announcement in relation to its mining and exploration rights for the Manono Lithium and Tin Project.'
And lucky trying hold downward dog for 20 seconds makes me too exhausted to try do anything other than collapseYou are lucky Sammy can't swim
The trick is to be so mental that you don't even realise you've snapped.
Oi if we are handing out 'snacks' I'll be needing a lin....I mean a snack too
We should have all been on the cocaine by now! Living it up on some yacht.The trick is to be so mental that you don't even realise you've snapped.
Oi if we are handing out 'snacks' I'll be needing a lin....I mean a snack too