Azzler
Top 20
This isn't based on any intel, just my opinion.
But I don't believe the Kobald deal is dependent on Rwanda signing a peace deal.
Despite what August reports on X, and respect to him, but I disagree.
I think the US have contingencies for this not happening, I was massively skeptical from the start that these 2 nations who hate each other to death more than anything else, would sign a peace agreement in 30 days.
Now that I think about it, that short time frame was probably done because the US didn't think they would even if they gave it 5 years, so in order not to waste time, at least they can say they gave them every opportunity.
The DRC just want Rwanda out, and if the reports are true, the troops are leaving now.
The US just need to help get Rwanda out, and I believe that is the real requirements for the DRC to agree to the Kobald deal.
I think the USA are going to get this minerals deal done no matter what these retarded nations ruled by babies do, they're determined and are moving fast.
Again this is just my musings on the topic.
P.S. It's so nice to have civilized conversations in a protected place again with all of you wonderful people
P.P.S. Conspiracy time.... The Chinese or those aligned with them poisoned Kagame to slow the process down.![]()
To add to this, it just occurred to me that the peace signing between the DRC and Rwanda, was probably the USA's idea, and likely had to push the DRC for it to be a part of the deal.
The USA need legals and optics to be seen to be doing things above board, to show results. Trump already bragged about bringing peace to the DRC. But it really needs to be official.
Otherwise them having operatives in Africa feels a bit off, like siding militarily to the DRC.
If a peace deal is signed, then the US opposing any M23 activity in the DRC is not an act against Rwanda, it's providing security for their own mineral supply in the DRC against terrorists.
The DRC want Rwanda out but fucked if they want to shake hands with their enemy, they hate them like nothing else.
So the point I'm making here is that if this is the case, then the DRC would not be insisting that the peace agreement must be signed before they approve the AVZ/Kobald deal.
Again this is just more speculation from me, but what else are we meant to talk about?