AVZ Discussion 2022

Frank

Top 20
In Kigali, Boulos said Washington’s proposal will benefit both DRC and Rwanda and will be “rooted in regional stability and peace as well as economic development.”

“During our discussions, President Kagame committed to pursuing this vision of peace.

I can confirm that the United States also remains committed to this effort and is ready to facilitate an end to this conflict, obviously a peaceful end to this conflict,” he told the media on Tuesday evening at the US Embassy in Kigali.

But there was a subtle threat: Those who won’t toe the line will face consequences.

Washington is especially keen on ensuring Rwanda ceases backing rebels across the border in the Congo and pulls back any military support it had deployed.

According to diplomatic sources familiar with the discussions, this will ensure each country can carry its can on internal security challenges.

Boulos said the US wants an end “that allows countries to secure their borders and lays the foundation for a thriving regional economy.

This relationship has great potential, and we appreciate the opportunity to discuss the way forward with our counterparts here in Kigali.

The deal is to benefit American access to minerals in the Congo, such as cobalt, lithium, uranium, gold and coltan.


And while Washington demanded that Rwanda tone down rebel backing, it also wants Kinshasa to provide state authority in eastern DRC, whose absence has previously fuelled armed conflict.

Kinshasa will also be required to tame corruption in its agencies, end the activities of the FDLR, a rebel group hiding in DRC and which Kigali blames for insecurity in Rwandan territory, and provide easier entry for American investments, including mining companies.

In Kinshasa, Boulos, did not name the value of investments the US wants to put into the Congo, but he did admit security will be a factor when he met with President Félix Tshisekedi on April 3.

“Of course, we need an environment that is as conducive to business as possible to achieve this objective.

Rest assured that American companies are operating transparently and will stimulate local economies.

“We’re talking about multibillion-dollar investments.


www.msn.com/en-xl/africa/top-stories/minerals-and-sanctions-trump-s-terms-conditions-to-aid-congo-peace-process/ar-AA1CP8KK?ocid=socialshare


one-hundred.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 18 users

Frank

Top 20
# Top 5.png



KoBold Makes Offe.png



*In other News i see where our friends at RIO have reached out in Brazil ⚒️

Brazilian Rare Earths.png
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 10 users

Frank

Top 20
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 10 users

Spikerama

Regular
Absolutely. ….never going to happen though . Sold 200k at the start of Jan 21 to put down the house deposit. Cap gain tax was around $140k …. Payment plan to ATO attracts a 9.5% interest charge compounding !!!!!! Good money if you can get it ….C——-s !!😡😡

$140K? That outrageous. How can CGT be 70% tax?
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 4 users
I suggest you all consider engaging a paid tax agent (not financial adviser) to work through the plan piece by piece.
Accountants can give you factual information about your situation only, a tax financial adviser can give you that information and advise you on a strategy for moving forwards, to each individuals situation. Accountants can provide information and can give you a nudge at what you could do, but only advisers can tell you what you should do.

Ideally, you'd engage both. Particularly (yes, we're getting ahead of ourselves) with some of the potential sums some people here are talking about. I definitely wouldn't say exclude an adviser in people's planning though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users

Frank

Top 20
I personally don’t want a dividend I want a capital return or something that triggers a CGT event.
So something like, Oh i don't know, maybe ;) (y) :love:


10-billion-dollars.jpg



Homer !!!.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 11 users

Juba1845

Regular
This doesn't look like a deal has been done or is being done . DRC still trying to have AVZ case against them thrown out. Looking more and more like it will play out through the courts. Long way to go.


Latest Development:
April 14, 2025 -
The Respondent files further observations on the request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
Accountants can give you factual information about your situation only, a tax financial adviser can give you that information and advise you on a strategy for moving forwards, to each individuals situation. Accountants can provide information and can give you a nudge at what you could do, but only advisers can tell you what you should do.

Ideally, you'd engage both. Particularly (yes, we're getting ahead of ourselves) with some of the potential sums some people here are talking about. I definitely wouldn't say exclude an adviser in people's planning though.
Maybe accountant to minimise the tax and planner to decide best use of proceeds given your individual situation
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Retrobyte

Hates a beer
This doesn't look like a deal has been done or is being done . DRC still trying to have AVZ case against them thrown out. Looking more and more like it will play out through the courts. Long way to go.


Latest Development:
April 14, 2025 -
The Respondent files further observations on the request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question.

Delaying tactic so Celestin and Alain can spend more time on Skyscanner finding the cheapest flight to Brussels.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 12 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
This doesn't look like a deal has been done or is being done . DRC still trying to have AVZ case against them thrown out. Looking more and more like it will play out through the courts. Long way to go.


Latest Development:
April 14, 2025 -
The Respondent files further observations on the request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question.


DRC will continue to do that until everything is absolutely final and i's dotted t's crossed.....just like AVZ on the other side

1744687389739.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
$140K? That outrageous. How can CGT be 70% tax?

100%......

There is no planet where either selling 200,000 AVZ shares (even at ATH) or $200k worth of AVZ shares will ever generate a CGT bill of $140k purely attributable to the transaction itself
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users

Doc

Master of Quan
This doesn't look like a deal has been done or is being done . DRC still trying to have AVZ case against them thrown out. Looking more and more like it will play out through the courts. Long way to go.


Latest Development:
April 14, 2025 -
The Respondent files further observations on the request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question.
Keep trying

uncle hut GIF
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 20 users

Goldenboy

Regular
$140K? That outrageous. How can CGT be 70% tax?
There was personal tax in there as well. Thankfully now retired so no tax …. Except for my personal holdings ( only AVZ ) when they get paid out there will be more cap gains and tax payable.
 

Goldenboy

Regular
100%......

There is no planet where either selling 200,000 AVZ shares (even at ATH) or $200k worth of AVZ shares will ever generate a CGT bill of $140k purely attributable to the transaction itself
Personal tax included. Still paying it off.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: 1 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

Remark

Top 20
What Jens said...

1744692395968.png


The respondent's objection reminds me of those "Sovereign citizens" stating that they are not subject to Australian law when they are pulled over for speeding with no license in an unregistered car.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Reactions: 18 users

Mute22

Regular

Latest Development:
April 14, 2025 -
The Respondent files further observations on the request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question.

Barnum And Bailey Circus GIF
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 11 users

Flight996

Regular
What Jens said...

The respondent's objection reminds me of those "Sovereign citizens" stating that they are not subject to Australian law when they are pulled over for speeding with no license in an unregistered car.

Gotta love them sovereign citz...

1744695625897.png
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: 4 users

wombat74

Top 20
What Jens said...

View attachment 82413

The respondent's objection reminds me of those "Sovereign citizens" stating that they are not subject to Australian law when they are pulled over for speeding with no license in an unregistered car.
All these Morons are doing is admitting their own guilt . Desperate f--kers .
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 15 users
Just for the record who made it possible these 2 steps by the Respondent happened in 2025 ...
1744699226071.png


1744699248237.png
1744699260855.png
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 5 users
Top Bottom