A party seeking recognition or enforcement in a Member State must provide a copy of the Award certified by the Secretary-General to a competent court (or other authority which the State has designated for this purpose (ICSID/8)). Certified copies are sent to the parties on the date of dispatch of the Award, and the parties may request additional copies at any time.The ICSID does not directly enforce penalties , but instead relies on the legal system of it's states to recognize and enforce as if they were final judgments of their domestic courts. Meaning that a party seeking to enforce an award must go through the relevant member state to collect any fines imposed .This enforcement is subject to the states laws on sovereign immunity . In other words if the DRC court refuses to recognize the ICSID decision there is little chance AVZ will see a dollar . This tells us a settlement needs to be reached before the first ICSID court date in June. If not we can assume the DRC do not recognize the ICSID
I read that as pay up or lose the benefits, which outweigh potential losses of being open and honest and sharing the fruits of planning and backing of AVZ, as well as the blood, sweat and tears of Manono - the alternative is far more ugly than granting a ML and revoking 13359 from the Zijin subsidiary and returning it to AVZ.Btw, DRC is a member state of ICSID.
Member States | ICSID
There are significant advantages to becoming a member of ICSID. Member States and their nationals obtain access to investment dispute settlement under the ICSID Convention and the Additional Facility, as well as to the facilities and expert services of the Secretariat.icsid.worldbank.org
Have a good one Shane
What wars?I read that as pay up or lose the benefits, which outweigh potential losses of being open and honest and sharing the fruits of planning and backing of AVZ, as well as the blood, sweat and tears of Manono - the alternative is far more ugly than granting a ML and revoking 13359 from the Zijin subsidiary and returning it to AVZ.
Haven't they got enough wars to fight, without starting wars with people that just wanted to grow with them?
Consider the M23 movement and said reason for it, and FT should be asking himself if he is not willingly creating disorder and resistance in an area of his country that is currently compliant and cohesive with the capital.
Tread carefully.
Those within the DRC government who accepted bribes are now compromised . Quite probable they have been offered sweeteners into the future if they follow CCP orders . Criminals and gangsters will always put self preservation and self interest ahead of what is right . Maybe a deal can be struck with Cath in the picture , but it has to happen before the ICSID trial begins .A party seeking recognition or enforcement in a Member State must provide a copy of the Award certified by the Secretary-General to a competent court (or other authority which the State has designated for this purpose (ICSID/8)). Certified copies are sent to the parties on the date of dispatch of the Award, and the parties may request additional copies at any time.
Although Member States must recognize and enforce the Award, each State’s laws relating to sovereign immunity from execution continue to apply (Article 55 of the ICSID Convention).
ICSID has no formal role in recognition and enforcement of an Award under the ICSID Convention. However, if a party informs ICSID of the other party’s non-compliance with an Award, it is ICSID’s practice to contact the non-complying party to request information on the steps that party has taken, or will take, to comply with the Award.
Welcome back Shane.I’ve been thinking what this could all mean for AVZ. And I honestly don’t have a clue. I don’t think it’s a good thing.
Separately, I’m worried China might deploy troops in some capacity to protect its strategic interests if this gets out of hand. PRC hasn’t done this sort of thing though so unsure. But it’s an unease on me that if this grows so will support for DRC from China.
Yeah I've been wondering the same.I’ve been thinking what this could all mean for AVZ. And I honestly don’t have a clue. I don’t think it’s a good thing.
Separately, I’m worried China might deploy troops in some capacity to protect its strategic interests if this gets out of hand. PRC hasn’t done this sort of thing though so unsure. But it’s an unease on me that if this grows so will support for DRC from China.
Wrong. We can enforce it in any member state.The ICSID does not directly enforce penalties , but instead relies on the legal system of it's states to recognize and enforce as if they were final judgments of their domestic courts. Meaning that a party seeking to enforce an award must go through the relevant member state to collect any fines imposed .This enforcement is subject to the states laws on sovereign immunity . In other words if the DRC court refuses to recognize the ICSID decision there is little chance AVZ will see a dollar . This tells us a settlement needs to be reached before the first ICSID court date in June. If not we can assume the DRC do not recognize the ICSID
Dont the US own the Lobito corridorYeah I've been wondering the same.
China is always looking for chances to increase its influence, and in the current era that could include militarily. If DRC accepted, they could legitimately use the conflict as a reason to bring in troops.
The big question is how that changes dynamics for everything else once it happens....
For us I dont think its a problem due to our partnership with CATH now, but it would certainly push things in new directions so who knows..