Wow, I was confused for a minute there. I thought you guys were typing Anusol - damn autocorrect
Wow, I was confused for a minute there. I thought you guys were typing Anusol - damn autocorrect
Sorry for being flippant Ptlas, this post highlights why china is so desperate to obtain and control Manono, bearing in mind they already control LEO too which is by no means in the ball park of AVZ but a handy add on none the less.
Manono would solve all of Chinas problem, assuming Anatol is correct with his theory that chinese lepodolite is on the wane.
Dont let it happen !
The main question I have is, why and how has the AFP decided to go balls deep and execute a search warrant with 10 officers, if the search warrant is in regard to allegations of bribery which would logically be regarding the payment of money to Marius Mihigo.
Everything was done above board/cleared by DLA Piper, as is reported in the AFR article that Tom Richardson wrote (as today's announcement refers to media leaks in Feb 2023, which was Tom Richardson's article in the AFR). It specifically mentions the board consulted the legal firm, and implemented the legal advice, which was to not offer a mix of shares/cash as additional fees.
If we assume today's announcement is the whole truth, and there aren't other elements of corruption/bribery being investigated, I'm just surprised that such a massive undertaking was conducted over something that doesn't seem particularly damning/has been done with legal advice. Maybe someone with experience of such investigations can comment?
I guess my main questions at this stage are:
1. Were the AFP sniffing around before AVZ wrote to them in June, or did AVZ honestly write to them first to get ahead of the ball, and their investigation has resulted from that?
2. Is what has been reported by Tom R in 2023 bribery/corruption if we assume that is the whole truth and if it was done with legal advice and above board? As in, considering all that, is paying a 1 million consultant fee a bribe? If so, what's the difference between a bribe and a consultant fee?
3. Does the AFP have jurisdiction over these things, if it was paid to a foreign consultant? Wouldn't that require a compromising/breaking of the law in both countries and therefore bilateral legal co-operation to investigate? It seems it would affect the DRC far more than Australia in this case.
4. As mentioned in the announcement today, if all throughout the ICISD process and the arbitration processes, as far as we know no evidence has been found or supplied for 'baseless' bribery claims, why would the AFP undertake such a massive operation? And if AVZ have been co-operative from the beginning, why would they need to "raid" the office?
I feel these are all reasonable questions.
![]()
Lawyers warned on potential deterioration of AVZ’s governance
Zijin Mining has blamed AVZ for the DRC’s decision to revoke a mining licence, as AVZ refused to comment whether its trading halt could be lifted.www.afr.com
This is the old AFR article mentioned in today's announcement if anyone has forgotten.
"Zijin has blamed AVZ for the DRC's decision to revoke the mining licence ."
Tell me how paying a consultant in the DRC to encourage a better relationship between the DRC Gov and AVZ is a crime ?The main question I have is, why and how has the AFP decided to go balls deep and execute a search warrant with 10 officers, if the search warrant is in regard to allegations of bribery which would logically be regarding the payment of money to Marius Mihigo.
Everything was done above board/cleared by DLA Piper, as is reported in the AFR article that Tom Richardson wrote (as today's announcement refers to media leaks in Feb 2023, which was Tom Richardson's article in the AFR). It specifically mentions the board consulted the legal firm, and implemented the legal advice, which was to not offer a mix of shares/cash as additional fees.
If we assume today's announcement is the whole truth, and there aren't other elements of corruption/bribery being investigated, I'm just surprised that such a massive undertaking was conducted over something that doesn't seem particularly damning/has been done with legal advice. Maybe someone with experience of such investigations can comment?
I guess my main questions at this stage are:
1. Were the AFP sniffing around before AVZ wrote to them in June, or did AVZ honestly write to them first to get ahead of the ball, and their investigation has resulted from that?
2. Is what has been reported by Tom R in 2023 bribery/corruption if we assume that is the whole truth and if it was done with legal advice and above board? As in, considering all that, is paying a 1 million consultant fee a bribe? If so, what's the difference between a bribe and a consultant fee?
3. Does the AFP have jurisdiction over these things, if it was paid to a foreign consultant? Wouldn't that require a compromising/breaking of the law in both countries and therefore bilateral legal co-operation to investigate? It seems it would affect the DRC far more than Australia in this case.
4. As mentioned in the announcement today, if all throughout the ICISD process and the arbitration processes, as far as we know no evidence has been found or supplied for 'baseless' bribery claims, why would the AFP undertake such a massive operation? And if AVZ have been co-operative from the beginning, why would they need to "raid" the office?
I feel these are all reasonable questions.
Anus Hol (okay I assume silent H considering the marketing)Wow, I was confused for a minute there. I thought you guys were typing Anusol - damn autocorrect
Anus Hol (okay I assume silent H considering the marketing)
Genius name for a rectum product!
Superbly apt name for the investing climate in the DRC and the powers that be there
Just sayin'....![]()
Sorry about this Anatol….Sorry for being flippant Ptlas, this post highlights why china is so desperate to obtain and control Manono, bearing in mind they already control LEO too which is by no means in the ball park of AVZ but a handy add on none the less.
Manono would solve all of Chinas problem, assuming Anatol is correct with his theory that chinese lepodolite is on the wane.
Dont let it happen !
When will AVZ finally close the Netflix deal? It's going to be a trilogy.
Needs a murder or twoWhen will AVZ finally close the Netflix deal? It's going to be a trilogy.
Friends let you know the plan??AVZ expects to drawdown a first tranche of funds during December 2024.
Key Terms and Conditions
• No material adverse change has occurred.
Share holders are going to find out by December 31st if the AFP investigation is a material adverse change .