BRICK
Top 20
Its on VHS...link please
(child of the 80s)
Its on VHS...link please
Gotta be Felix in the sunglasses
This is interesting as they reference us in another story about Cassius Mining. Fast forward to around 1:05 minutes.
I think everyone knows its not ideal but DRC seem to be holding out.The lesson here is , avoid going down the ICSID rat hole . All it does is make lawyers and Nigel and co richer (salaries). Share holders picking up peanuts (if their lucky ) at end of a 4 to 5 years shit fight that ends in a negotiated settlement anyway on DRC terms when AVZ realise it's that or nothing . Obviously paid out by Chinese brown paper bags who have by this time developed the mine .
This has to be sorted now . Hopefully Nigel is close . No room for egos .
I think everyone knows its not ideal but DRC seem to be holding out.
No doubt China in their ear. Who will blink first? Let's hope DRC.
Does this give you a feeling things are not going too good ,Last response from Graeme yesterday.
Sounds they are playing chicken and Nigel is all in that the DRC flinches first
View attachment 57846
Last response from Graeme yesterday.
Sounds they are playing chicken and Nigel is all in that the DRC flinches first
View attachment 57846
Yep - reckon we are going all the way through the courts.Pretty much confirmation that not much negotiation going on and that DRC haven't given fucks to date.
You left off the last 2 postsLast response from Graeme yesterday.
Sounds they are playing chicken and Nigel is all in that the DRC flinches first
View attachment 57846
If DRC aren't playing ball then after all this time trading again won't help, it's just a race down to the bottom.You left of the last 2 posts
Mustafa Hedayat MAIB MIEAustView
So when are we going to see resumption of trading on ASX ?
Like
5![]()
![]()
Graeme JohnstonView Graeme Johnston’s profile • 3rd+Technical Director at AVZ Minerals
2d
Working on it
I thought it was an odd response from Graeme .Does it imply we are in discussions with the ASX ? I can only think of 2 reasons for trading again . Firstly we have reached an outcome with the DRC . Secondly we need to do a CR .If DRC aren't playing ball then after all this time trading again won't help, it's just a race down to the bottom.
If no progress then best to stay in suspension imo
wombat , why would you think we need a capital raise ? just to stay in the game ? but yes it was an odd response like talking to my 20 year old never a straight answerI thought it was an odd response from Graeme .Does it imply we are in discussions with the ASX ? I can only think of 2 reasons for trading again . Firstly we have reached and outcome with the DRC . Secondly we need to do a CR .
Sounds like we'll get their decision soon. Settlement or full litigation.Last response from Graeme yesterday.
Sounds they are playing chicken and Nigel is all in that the DRC flinches first
View attachment 57846
Could need a CR if Locke don't come to the party . I'm just thinking out loud . Open to interpretation . Graeme could have responded to that post after 20 stubbies for all I know . Management have been loose with some of their comments in the past . Like what they've said meant SFA . IMOwombat , why would you think we need a capital raise ? just to stay in the game ? but yes it was an odd response like talking to my 20 year old never a straight answer
He wouldn't have said the thing about DRC gov if there was an outcome in sight which means maybe possible CR? But CR only needed if locke don't come through. Could be just backup planning.I thought it was an odd response from Graeme .Does it imply we are in discussions with the ASX ? I can only think of 2 reasons for trading again . Firstly we have reached an outcome with the DRC . Secondly we need to do a CR .