Bin59
Regular
.
classic.austlii.edu.au
Agree with the items you listed Winenut, imo the nominees for directors wouldn’t be fit to be directors of AVZ based on 1(a) & 1(b) alone.
Everyone should get their head around section 14 of the Constitution (from page 36) and absolutely make sure we do not let ANY of the slimy fuckers involved with the thieving and corrupt MMGA movement achieve a position on the Board of AVZ Minerals
https://static1.squarespace.com/sta...2/AVZ+Proposed+Constitution+November+2019.pdf
MMGA are a desperate collection of individuals who have their own financial agenda for Manono that does NOT include you
MMGA do not act in the interests of LT AVZ holders
MMGA want to steal Manono and flog it for peanuts
MMGA is aligned with corruption and nefarious business practices
MMGA is veiled in secrecy and its backers are largely unknown
MMGA want your money and do not care how they get it
MMGA and their activities can cause you substantial financial harm
CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 182 Use of position--civil obligations
Agree with the items you listed Winenut, imo the nominees for directors wouldn’t be fit to be directors of AVZ based on 1(a) & 1(b) alone.