Wasn't corruption "the" risk?
And the thing that caught us out was the "extent" of it?
Climate: country-solution or country with problems without solution?
Issue.
Who does not remember?
A whole lesson in primary school.
The challenge was to find the answer.
In consecrated jargon, the solution.
With the existential challenge linked to the climate, here is the DRC donning the costume of “solution country”.
Not without reason.
Owner of more than 60% of the Congo Basin, the country of Lumumba is part of one of the three "lungs" of the world.
Country-solution, so it makes sense.
The problem is that you can be a solution for the whole world and still be a problem for yourself.
Such is the Rd-Congolese enigma.
A paradox as old as Jules Cornet's quote that “the Congo is a geological scandal”.
Drawn up at the end of the 19th century, this observation by the Belgian geologist has not aged in the slightest.
The Congo has always been a solution country.
Uranium, diamond, copper, cobalt, coltan and last but not least lithium!
So many hyper-strategic minerals that have ended up sticking to Congo's skin the enviable status of "solution country" not without making people envious.
Country-solution, the DRC has always been.
It is even his vocation.
The question, like Cicero in the Catilinaires, is that of knowing until when the Congo will remain a “country of solutions” without solving its own problems.
A snub to Albert Einstein for whom “every problem has its solution”.
The risk therefore is to see Kinshasa content once again and even too much with the policy of proclamation or display with its new mascot “pays solution”.
And to go from summit to summit without this asset really benefiting the Congolese.
Morality, the solution to the Congolese problem is that before truly being a "solution country", it is important to first stop being a "problem country".
This is our problem.
mediacongo