Agree, not appropriate at all.Errr, Flexi, pretty sure that's not appropriate regards to the amazing women out there, not to mention it's Mothers day, not wanting to spell it out but........
CLITS.
The YES campaign, a much better option.
Agree, not appropriate at all.
Look, I think I’m the only one here truely qualified to determine what’s appropriate.I think you're being sensitive. This isn't a liberal arts college.
Contrary views or queries are not prejudice. Information assymetry may make one think there is prejudice but on what basis is the purported prejudice built on?
Was the company’s presentation of facts?
Was AVZ hiding bad news?
Yes.
If yes, was it legitimate to hide?
Yes and No.
How did you come to that conclusion?
AVZ clarified directly to me facts related to its (hysterical) May o4 media speculation statement. The IGF started speaking rather than Franck Fwamba’s incomplete snippets.
What about that May 04 statement?
Try reading it again after 12 months and ask as a more informed reader was it generous in clarifying what has been going on?
Are the arguments for non-disclosure by an ASX company based purely on whether a 3rd or 2nd party is acting within or outside the law.
NO.
I saw a lot of prejudice that maintained people’s heads in ostrich holes.
Just remember how great the Apollonian deception was, in Germany at that time April 2022. And the shock something else is going on entirely different. Would you be suspicious about “exit strategies” in a AXINO presentation.
Was there no curiosity about what Fwamba was muttering on Twitter months before?
Anglophones were so in the dark.
The other historical matters I brought up were all precipitated by the 2021 AGM — many here have since concluded there was issues how that meeting was run. I’ve had issues with it for years earlier. And not seeing Michael Hughes presenting not at a later date when fit to do, just wasn’t right for an ASX 200 company. There was a smell
The thing is, I am aware of all that. I am also aware of your constant undermining of AVZ exec’s and BOD and your efforts to encourage a movement against them as well as your efforts encouraging a class action against them.
At the present time we are fighting WITH the company, against a number of corrupt and bribed entities in the DRC and China while YOU continue to undermine us.
No one has forgotten about your relationship with Simon Cong and no one has forgotten about the aliases you use. I’m pretty sure you sold shares then either bought or borrowed more.
One thing is crystal clear, you are not here to support shareholders or AVZ
The thing is, I am aware of all that. I am also aware of your constant undermining of AVZ exec’s and BOD and your efforts to encourage a movement against them as well as your efforts encouraging a class action against them.
At the present time we are fighting WITH the company, against a number of corrupt and bribed entities in the DRC and China while YOU continue to undermine us.
No one has forgotten about your relationship with Simon Cong and no one has forgotten about the aliases you use. I’m pretty sure you sold shares then either bought or borrowed more.
One thing is crystal clear, you are not here to support shareholders or AVZ
Hi Frank*Fyi, In case anyone missed it, like i did the other Day
View attachment 36416
View attachment 36417
View attachment 36418
This is all that I could find https://www.reuters.com/article/cobalt-congo-ahome-idINL8N2A666VAnyone know who Cree EGC is?
I doubt it. They too would be muttering how awful their government is.But like me, those chinese shareholders (and probably most of the others too) paid very little for their shares - well under 10 cents, so the economic value to lose is zippo (even though the theoretical market value has been massive). Opportunity cost only, if they never see their funds again.
The current Chinese shareholders would see it as a sacrifice for the greater good - Zijin has little to lose, CATH has even less, but CHINA has everything to win by trying to screw us
Kunts
don't mean to be seen as taking their side, just having an Eyore moment
Perhaps ICC matters. DRC can’t expect financial aid and not follow International law.
Damned if you do dammed if you don’t…Anyone who has read my comments knows…. I don’t like being here, but I do it because I want AVZ to succeed. Not just for me, also for shareholder’s I have developed relationships with as well as the poor people of Manono.
I’m holding off for the moment, but still gathering information and looking at ways to add it to any media promoting the DRC MINING WEEK events in June and September.
Mupande, CAMI and THE VUKA GROUP are front and centre of these events and if they want to keep fucking us around and now taking us off the CAMI portal, then we might as well let international investors know what doing business in the DRC involves.
I’m attaching my latest post on the DRC MINING WEEK thread and the link so shareholders can reach all the information on it. I don’t want comments tying the thread up, just want the facts clearly presented. I’ve provided clear facts and information, it’s up to shareholders to decide what they want to do
I’m not sure how many shareholders read this thread…. But there is more than enough evidence of corruption and extortion in the DRC mining sector to inform potential international investors ahead of the two DRC MINING WEEK events (June and September).
The evidence includes AVZ Minerals work (over the last 6 years in the DRC) developing the Manono Lithium Project as the majority shareholder in Dathcom, and includes the recent ICC (International Court of Arbitration) ruling, declaring Cominiere’s attempts to terminate AVZ’s partnership in the Dathcom joint venture as unlawful.
The evidence also shows that CAMI has now removed AVZ Minerals from holding the Exploration Rights (PR) on the 13359 tenement on the Landfolio Cadastre Map Portal
https://static1.squarespace.com/sta...230417+New+legal+action+to+affirm+interests+i
DRC MINING WEEK 2023
Here is the agenda of DRC Mining Week 2023 scheduled for June 14 to 16 in Lubumbashi As announced, DRC Mining Week opens its doors from June 14 to 16, 2023 at Karavia Hotel in Lubumbashi in the province of Haut-Katanga in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The day of June 14, 2023 is...thestockexchange.com.au
Yep Nigel would have to prioritise the expectations of the Australian jurisdiction. Do the Congolese understand that?
Yes, early on in Tshisekedi’s presidency he was making all the right moves with EU and for massive funding.AUKUS, Assange, and the “seething pathologies” of the American Security State - Pearls and Irritations
An edited extract of Bob Carr’s interview with Philip Adams on Late Night Live, ‘Bob Carr on the case to free Julian Assange’, May 8, 2023johnmenadue.com
Just shows how public opinion matters.
Perhaps ICC matters. DRC can’t expect financial aid and not follow International law.
I wouldn’t take his bait, his checking you out.Listen buddy - in your dogmas you don’t understand anything you haven’t learned is not to attack me with your paranoid diatribes.
A “class action”, please explain this one. This is new.
Do you still believe this?Was AVZ hiding bad news?
Yes.
If yes, was it legitimate to hide?
Yes and No.
Are the arguments for non-disclosure by an ASX company based purely on whether a 3rd or 2nd party is acting within or outside the law.
NO.
Hey bhagsThe thing is, I am aware of all that. I am also aware of your constant undermining of AVZ exec’s and BOD and your efforts to encourage a movement against them as well as your efforts encouraging a class action against them.
At the present time we are fighting WITH the company, against a number of corrupt and bribed entities in the DRC and China while YOU continue to undermine us.
No one has forgotten about your relationship with Simon Cong and no one has forgotten about the aliases you use. I’m pretty sure you sold shares then either bought or borrowed more.
One thing is crystal clear, you are not here to support shareholders or AVZ