AVZ Discussion 2022

Samus

Top 20
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users

Spikerama

Regular
Can you put all the latest links in a new thread for swift deployment?
Ok how do I make a new thread? I looked at it the other day but it wasn't obvious to me. :p
_____

edit: Nevermind. Found it. Will do it after tea.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 10 users

wombat74

Top 20

I cant see how anything is unexpected . We are expecting something . What we did expect is now unexpected . So what is expected is something unexpected . In other words no one has a f--king clue what's going on .
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Fire
Reactions: 31 users

Samus

Top 20

The IGF must not give in to these kinds of pressures to please the predators. Real change always encounters resistance.

URGENT #lubumbashi , gathering of agents from all constituencies (west, east, plateaux) lubumbashi land affairs to say #NON to < < the imperialism of the IGF > >
@IgfRdc
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 5 users

Samus

Top 20

Can someone explain to me this story of AVZ and DRC, the campaign on social networks does not weaken between those who feel cheated etc. what is the story?
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 13 users

ptlas

Regular
I cant see how anything is unexpected . We are expecting something . What we did expect is now unexpected . So what is expected is something unexpected . In other words no one has a f--king clue what's going on .
I expect you're right
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 12 users
  • Haha
  • Thinking
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users

John25

Regular
Be nice if our MD or BoD grew a pair & actually did something for their pay ,nothing in 3 months since pic with Mr Pei at lift in AVZ office …like a bunch of grinning idiots …Accountability or we going to drift by into March with SFA news …Sorry but how damn hard is it to get anything done by our BoD , have we actually got anyone in the DRC
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Thinking
Reactions: 17 users

TDITD

Top 20
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users

BEISHA

Top 20
@9cardomaha

I havnt had the opportunity to thankyou for your sleuthing talent, sharing alot of pertinent DRC documentation to us all .....as we attempt to put the jig saw pieces together to garner how the fuck AVZ got to where we are now..........:poop::poop::poop::poop:

I dont know if this has been requested before or not, so apologies in advance, but are you able to get a copy of the DRC mining law regards to EXPLORATION TENEMENT RENEWAL.

Would like to observe the rules and regulations regards to that in a official capacity.

I know we have covered the topic before regards to CDL, how AVZ poked some holes in the south , but not the north, therefore providing the corruptors with a " loop hole " to steal the north , but i wonder whether that can be done legally under the DRC mining code ........;)

Normally in Australian mining code, or per aggreement with a JV, a minimum spend is required to be executed within a certain time frame, no stipulation whether it has to be done in a certain area or not, just as long as its done within the tenement boundary.

I betcha thats the same with DRC code too, but would love confirmation of that if possible.

Just cant believe for the love of god, how AVZ could be penalised to this extent, for not poking a few holes in the north of CDL.

With that in mind, cant believe Nigel mentioned that the north had high mica content on the RS without any assay proof ........:unsure:

I wonder what would of happened to our mining decree if indeed AVZ did put a few drill holes in the north ?

missed it by that much.gif





imo
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 17 users

Samus

Top 20
With that in mind, cant believe Nigel mentioned that the north had high mica content on the RS without any assay proof ........:unsure:

I wonder what would of happened to our mining decree if indeed AVZ did put a few drill holes in the north ?
Lucky he's got plenty of AJN shares. :unsure:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Fire
Reactions: 13 users

Thunderpony

27 µg per 100 mL
Combine everything, then AVZ 75% DRC 25%.
Start fresh, stay above board, and DRC will quickly get international support.

Remove the Chinese completely out of all DRC mining, in exchange for writing off the losses suffered.

Win Win.
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 14 users

Onthefm

Regular
Lucky he's got plenty of AJN shares. :unsure:
I'll bet money ( not that I have any, tied up in some shitshow pretend mining co) he got those given to him as well.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Fire
Reactions: 6 users
@9cardomaha

I havnt had the opportunity to thankyou for your sleuthing talent, sharing alot of pertinent DRC documentation to us all .....as we attempt to put the jig saw pieces together to garner how the fuck AVZ got to where we are now..........:poop::poop::poop::poop:

I dont know if this has been requested before or not, so apologies in advance, but are you able to get a copy of the DRC mining law regards to EXPLORATION TENEMENT RENEWAL.

Would like to observe the rules and regulations regards to that in a official capacity.

I know we have covered the topic before regards to CDL, how AVZ poked some holes in the south , but not the north, therefore providing the corruptors with a " loop hole " to steal the north , but i wonder whether that can be done legally under the DRC mining code ........;)

Normally in Australian mining code, or per aggreement with a JV, a minimum spend is required to be executed within a certain time frame, no stipulation whether it has to be done in a certain area or not, just as long as its done within the tenement boundary.

I betcha thats the same with DRC code too, but would love confirmation of that if possible.

Just cant believe for the love of god, how AVZ could be penalised to this extent, for not poking a few holes in the north of CDL.

With that in mind, cant believe Nigel mentioned that the north had high mica content on the RS without any assay proof ........:unsure:

I wonder what would of happened to our mining decree if indeed AVZ did put a few drill holes in the north ?

View attachment 30232




imo

From the 2018 Mining Code
Article 62
: Conditions for the renewal of the Research Permit
The Research Permit is renewable provided that the holder :

a. has not failed to comply with its obligations to maintain the validity of the permit under sections 196 to 199 of this Code by submitting:
- proof of the certification of commencement of work duly issued by the Mining Cadastre ;
- proof of payment of annual surface fees per square and tax on the area of mining and hydrocarbon concessions.
b. submits a report of the research carried out during the previous period of validity of his title and the results obtained ;
c. submits a timetable for carrying out the research work ;
d. proves the effective opening of a Research Centre duly certified by the local authorities and the Provincial Mines Division;
e. has not failed in its fiscal, parafiscal and customs obligations;
f. identifies the remaining phases to be completed to reach the final stage of reserve certification and the development of feasibility studies;
g. presents the supplementary budget in relation to the programme of research work corresponding to the remaining phases listed above.

The application for renewal of the Research Permit is sent by the applicant to the Mining Cadastre at least three months and not more than six months before the date of expiry of the Permit, and must contain the the following information:
a. the particulars provided for in subparagraphs b and c of Article 35 of this Code;
b. the number of squares to be renewed and their location ;
c. the identity of the companies ;
d. the nature, number and size of the perimeters of the Research Permits held by the holder and his affiliated companies.

On the occasion of renewal, the holder of the Research Permit automatically renounces at least 50% of the perimeter covered by his permit and must develop and obtain the approval of the revised Mitigation and Rehabilitation Plan for the proposed activity, before continuing the work mining research.

The Mining Regulation determines the terms and conditions of the deposit, admissibility or inadmissibility, the investigation, the decision to renew the Research Permit as well as its registration and display.
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
  • Love
Reactions: 8 users

wombat74

Top 20
@9cardomaha

I havnt had the opportunity to thankyou for your sleuthing talent, sharing alot of pertinent DRC documentation to us all .....as we attempt to put the jig saw pieces together to garner how the fuck AVZ got to where we are now..........:poop::poop::poop::poop:

I dont know if this has been requested before or not, so apologies in advance, but are you able to get a copy of the DRC mining law regards to EXPLORATION TENEMENT RENEWAL.

Would like to observe the rules and regulations regards to that in a official capacity.

I know we have covered the topic before regards to CDL, how AVZ poked some holes in the south , but not the north, therefore providing the corruptors with a " loop hole " to steal the north , but i wonder whether that can be done legally under the DRC mining code ........;)

Normally in Australian mining code, or per aggreement with a JV, a minimum spend is required to be executed within a certain time frame, no stipulation whether it has to be done in a certain area or not, just as long as its done within the tenement boundary.

I betcha thats the same with DRC code too, but would love confirmation of that if possible.

Just cant believe for the love of god, how AVZ could be penalised to this extent, for not poking a few holes in the north of CDL.

With that in mind, cant believe Nigel mentioned that the north had high mica content on the RS without any assay proof ........:unsure:

I wonder what would of happened to our mining decree if indeed AVZ did put a few drill holes in the north ?

View attachment 30232




imo
I really hope for Nigel's sake AJN do not get the North . He doesn't need that sh1t storm raining down on him .
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Wow
Reactions: 17 users

BEISHA

Top 20
From the 2018 Mining Code
Article 62
: Conditions for the renewal of the Research Permit
The Research Permit is renewable provided that the holder :

a. has not failed to comply with its obligations to maintain the validity of the permit under sections 196 to 199 of this Code by submitting:
- proof of the certification of commencement of work duly issued by the Mining Cadastre ;
- proof of payment of annual surface fees per square and tax on the area of mining and hydrocarbon concessions.
b. submits a report of the research carried out during the previous period of validity of his title and the results obtained ;
c. submits a timetable for carrying out the research work ;
d. proves the effective opening of a Research Centre duly certified by the local authorities and the Provincial Mines Division;
e. has not failed in its fiscal, parafiscal and customs obligations;
f. identifies the remaining phases to be completed to reach the final stage of reserve certification and the development of feasibility studies;
g. presents the supplementary budget in relation to the programme of research work corresponding to the remaining phases listed above.

The application for renewal of the Research Permit is sent by the applicant to the Mining Cadastre at least three months and not more than six months before the date of expiry of the Permit, and must contain the the following information:
a. the particulars provided for in subparagraphs b and c of Article 35 of this Code;
b. the number of squares to be renewed and their location ;
c. the identity of the companies ;
d. the nature, number and size of the perimeters of the Research Permits held by the holder and his affiliated companies.

On the occasion of renewal, the holder of the Research Permit automatically renounces at least 50% of the perimeter covered by his permit and must develop and obtain the approval of the revised Mitigation and Rehabilitation Plan for the proposed activity, before continuing the work mining research.

The Mining Regulation determines the terms and conditions of the deposit, admissibility or inadmissibility, the investigation, the decision to renew the Research Permit as well as its registration and display.
Thank you good sir.

"On the occasion of renewal, the holder of the Research Permit automatically renounces at least 50% of the perimeter covered by his permit and must develop and obtain the approval of the revised Mitigation and Rehabilitation Plan for the proposed activity, before continuing the work mining research."


Maybe this is the clause that puts a spanner in the works.......:unsure:


imo
 
  • Thinking
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users

Samus

Top 20
Interesting where corruption exists that there is a (piss poor and unfair) resolution within days. But still nothing for a company that follows the law many months after the IGF report. :unsure:

#RDC : After the report of the IGF putting pressure on Chinese companies, the DG of the Government Agency for Monitoring the Chinese Contract, announces the agreement which has just been signed between the 2 parties. Payment to the DRC of 500 million USD in 2023 for infrastructure.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 5 users

Charbella

Regular
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 18 users

Rediah

Regular


"The best things happen unexpectedly"

Try convincing a guy who is awoken in the morning with a gentle soft kiss on his lips in his jail cell.


Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Hope you are on the money this time Deboss.

george bush GIF


Deboss, you are a good man, no doubt, but you have to give us something better than that.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Haha
Reactions: 11 users

obe wan

Regular
Thank you good sir.

"On the occasion of renewal, the holder of the Research Permit automatically renounces at least 50% of the perimeter covered by his permit and must develop and obtain the approval of the revised Mitigation and Rehabilitation Plan for the proposed activity, before continuing the work mining research."


Maybe this is the clause that puts a spanner in the works.......:unsure:


imo
That’s only for a research permit ; it’s the reason we lost 50% on the extensions I.e . Leaving it too long and not doing anything and having to renew
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 9 users
Top Bottom