AVZ Discussion 2022


CHINESE MINING COMPANY
ZIGIN MINING PREVIOUSLY EXPOSED FOR HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND FRAUD…. NOW EXPOSED BLACKMAILING IN THE DRC TO GET A SLICE OF THE MANONO LITHIUM PROJECT




54EF90C6-AD75-45B8-A0BE-628DEEB71405.jpeg



 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 26 users

TheCount

Regular

‘Securing raw material is more important than the price’

Battery giant LG Chem is desperate for EV metals

LG Chem says it is prioritising efforts to secure raw materials

South Korea’s LG Chem, one of the largest chemical companies in the world, has told Bloomberg it is looking into securing its own raw materials through potential partnerships and investments in mining companies in a bid to establish a self-sufficient supply chain.

It’s a big move and one which could reduce China’s battery dominance.

As it stands, China dominates battery production from the mining and refining of raw materials with estimates out of Benchmark Mineral Intelligence suggesting China has 75% of the world’s cobalt refining capacity and 59% of its lithium processing capacity.

For a company like LG Chem, the parent company of the world’s second largest battery cell maker (LG Energy Solution), to come out and attempt to lock in raw materials supply highlights just how important securing supply chains has become.



As it stands, China dominates battery production from the mining and refining of raw materials with estimates out of Benchmark Mineral Intelligence suggesting China has 75% of the world’s cobalt refining capacity and 59% of its lithium processing capacity.

For a company like LG Chem, the parent company of the world’s second largest battery cell maker (LG Energy Solution), to come out and attempt to lock in raw materials supply highlights just how important securing supply chains has become.




EV sales to jump from 2m in 2020 to 73m per year by 2040

Electric vehicles could make up about half of all new vehicle sales worldwide by 2035, which provides a hint of where future lithium demand will come from.

Goldman Sachs Research forecast that EV sales will jump to 73 million units in 2040, up from about 2 million in 2020.

Developed countries are expected to be at the forefront of this shift, with EVs expected to secure more than 80% of the market.

“We expect the automobile industry to undergo a major transformation between 2020 and 2030, driven by the increasing adoption of vehicle electrification and autonomous driving,” Goldman Sachs equity research strategist Kota Yuzawa said.

“There will be no let-up in the EV industry’s expansion as environmental rules tighten and electrification technologies become more sophisticated. But the sector’s sources of profits will change dramatically.”

Additionally, the market for EV batteries, which account for as much as 40% of the car’s cost, is becoming concentrated with the top five manufacturers accounting for more than 80% of the global market share in 2020.

Efforts to diversify the battery supply chain are also gaining momentum with the US Inflation Reduction Act, which is due to be officially announced in March, expected to give a relative advantage to manufacturers that are pushing ahead with local production in the US for EVs, battery-related products and EV components.

Goldman Sachs adds that tech innovation will be critical for the industry with the EV battery market expected to grow substantially this decade, driven in part by the development of new materials and the introduction of new battery designs.

Powertrain units and thermal management will also become more efficient to reduce power consumption as engineers seek to reduce the weight of EVs.

View attachment 29575

BYD to build $1.2bn EV battery plant in central China


BYD, the world’s largest maker of electrified vehicles, plans to invest $1.2 billion to build a new factory for its batteries in China, according to environmental appraisal filings.
blank.gif

FinDreams Technology, the Chinese company’s battery unit, is aiming to build a facility with the capacity to produce 40 gigawatt hours per year of its Blade Battery in the city of Zhengzhou in Henan province, according to environmental filings published on the Zhengzhou government website on Friday seeking public feedback on the project.

A company spokesperson could not immediately comment on the matter when contacted by Reuters.

BYD’s Blade Battery is a less bulky lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) battery that its Chairman Wang Chuanfu has said is safer than other alternatives in the market and will not catch fire.

It has been powering BYD’s best-selling battery electric cars such as the Han and Seal sedans that compete with Tesla’s Model 3 in China.

The South China Morning Post earlier reported BYD’s Zhengzhou battery plant.

mining.com

LG Chem prepares to lock in mineral supplies

www.mining.com/web/lg-chem-prepares-to-lock-in-mineral-supplies/


View attachment 29576

Food for thought on the long and winding Road to Manono :unsure:

GLTAH's (y)

Frank :cool:

Nice post buddy..
TC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9 users

wombat74

Top 20
At this point it would seem safe to assume that the DRC does not want AVZ to mine this, or at the very least is in some way incapable of providing the mining license.
Buy us out and lets move on. Even at $2, Zijin and DRC will make monster profits. Let the DRC deal with the consequences of corruption.
The alternative is this gets caught up in the courts for the next 2 years which no party wants.
We hold minimum 51% . ML requires minimum 51% . For us not to get it the MoM is either going to rip us off completely (as in we hold 0%) OR we get bought out . imo
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 11 users

BEISHA

Top 20
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 4 users

LzrTr8dr

Regular
1676423160194.png

They have got to be joking - does imminent nowadays mean the opposite to what it used to?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 18 users

Panther22

Regular
Do we know if Felix is aware of what is going on or is he too busy with other issues in the DRC that the AVZ saga is low priority or not his problem, he has Ministers to handle our problem or let the ICC handle it completely?
Who judges the wrong doing and rights the wrongs? It appears there is a lot of evidence in AVZ favor but how do we get back on track?
Are we relying on people that have stabbed us in the back already?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 9 users

BEISHA

Top 20

A pound of cobalt has gone down from $40 to $17.........wow, that really must hurt the DRC coffers , being a country that produces 70% of the worlds supply.

They say the reason for this drop is that cobalt is substituted out more and more in the production of EV batteries in lieu of nickel, iron phosphate and of course LITHIUM.

A interesting article which highlights the DRC backwards progression, as they were warned that lithium requirement would eventually take over cobalt many years ago.......:sleep:

I thought the closing paragraph was very apt..........;):cautious::poop:



imo
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12 users

Retrobyte

Hates a beer
Ok so this is as far as I have got with the counter. Just need to figure out how to make it update based on the date so it doesn't reset per use case.

Had some good advice from someone here on how to do that. Not sure if he want's me to share his name but I haven't yet been able to implement that advice correctly. It makes the dollar amount (counter) static.

Also need to figure out how to make it embeddable in social media. My secret mentor seems to think it's not possible due to in app security protocols.

Anyway, it looks cool :cool:

How about creating a QR code for the counter and posting that on social media as needed?

qrcode_spikerama.github.io.png
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 6 users

whales

Regular

A pound of cobalt has gone down from $40 to $17.........wow, that really must hurt the DRC coffers , being a country that produces 70% of the worlds supply.

They say the reason for this drop is that cobalt is substituted out more and more in the production of EV batteries in lieu of nickel, iron phosphate and of course LITHIUM.

A interesting article which highlights the DRC backwards progression, as they were warned that lithium requirement would eventually take over cobalt many years ago.......:sleep:

I thought the closing paragraph was very apt..........;):cautious::poop:



imo
The new ministrial decrees removes 1 the splitting of 13359 and 2. restores the whole of 13359 .
According to the minining act the splitting of the tenement was illegal.
AVZ has done all the other pre requisites to obtain the mining licence .
So does the MOM now have 30 days from the additional new decrees to issue the Mining Licence ?
As this is according to the mining act .
 
  • Like
Reactions: 21 users

cruiser51

Top 20
:unsure:
I'm sure others would rather be on top of every facet of the situation as I would.
It's clearly a pack of lies sure.
This is what Zijin are pumping out to mainstream media in the DRC, one article after another while AVZ rarely rates a positive mention.
No point pretending it doesn't exist.
Yet in the New year's message and plans till 2030 from the chairman of the board of Zijin, there is absolutely no mention, absolutely zilch of Zijin's endeavours to steal the Manono lithium mine and to develop it.

He is probably not too sure or too proud about his lithium progress in the DRC that he wants to mention it.
He might be hoping for Easter eggs.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 13 users

bloke383

Regular
We hold minimum 51% . ML requires minimum 51% . For us not to get it the MoM is either going to rip us off completely (as in we hold 0%) OR we get bought out . imo
Gday wombat74 ,
Can you please name who you think would want to buy us out , & what price do you think they would offer ?
In my opinion I think it would only be a chinese company that would ever make an offer , & that they wouldn't offer any more than $1 . A chinese company is never going to offer double what we are valued now . I don't want AVZ to be taken over ... unless we are well into production & properly valued .
I don't think Jin cheng really want to go to the ICC (especially after the letter that surfaced yesterday) ,& that they are trying their hardest to get us to fold before that date , but they themselves won't concede up until the very last minute . I'm hoping the BoD hold firm , because if this ever goes to the ICC re true ownership etc , I don't think Jin cheng would stand a chance . Jin cheng shouldn't own 1% of this project as they have done nothing apart from lie , cheat & pay bribes to try to steal it from us .
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 25 users
Gday wombat74 ,
Can you please name who you think would want to buy us out , & what price do you think they would offer ?
In my opinion I think it would only be a chinese company that would ever make an offer , & that they wouldn't offer any more than $1 . A chinese company is never going to offer double what we are valued now . I don't want AVZ to be taken over ... unless we are well into production & properly valued .
I don't think Jin cheng really want to go to the ICC (especially after the letter that surfaced yesterday) ,& that they are trying their hardest to get us to fold before that date , but they themselves won't concede up until the very last minute . I'm hoping the BoD hold firm , because if this ever goes to the ICC re true ownership etc , I don't think Jin cheng would stand a chance . Jin cheng shouldn't own 1% of this project as they have done nothing apart from lie , cheat & pay bribes to try to steal it from us .

BHP have recently stated they are looking to invest in the DRC. I read it a few days ago, but have forgotten the link as I am more focused on exposing Zigin now. @Frank has previously posted information related to Zigin's illegal activities and I'm sure he will read this and let me know the links again.... Sorry for loosing them Frank!

It's hilarious to see poor tommy backpedaling and scrambling to defend himself after also being exposed for his misleading and deceptive articles and now facing legal prosecutions from AVZ, Marius Mahigi and other stakeholders.

If it wasn't blatant deception it would be a joke the lengths he has gone to manipulate investors against AVZ including his recent AFR article showing a group of protestors in North Kivu protesting a completely unrelated matter....

1676426937041.png


@BEISHA it takes a long time to get rid of corrupt ministers in government. Here in NSW it has taken years to successfully prosecute and jail corrupt State Ministers, and if you look Federally, even fucken Scotty from Marketing still holds his ministerial seat and his own party wouldn't even censure him after he took several of his minister's portfolio's (without anyone except the governor general knowing) and cancelled projects under those portfolio's. Possibly our most corrupt Prime Minister ever and still in office as a minister.... Should be the Minister of Lies and Deception.

Imagine how many companies would be scrambling for Manono and what price they would pay if the country can rid itself of corruption including corruption from companies like Zigin Mining
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Fire
Reactions: 23 users

wombat74

Top 20
Gday wombat74 ,
Can you please name who you think would want to buy us out , & what price do you think they would offer ?
In my opinion I think it would only be a chinese company that would ever make an offer , & that they wouldn't offer any more than $1 . A chinese company is never going to offer double what we are valued now . I don't want AVZ to be taken over ... unless we are well into production & properly valued .
I don't think Jin cheng really want to go to the ICC (especially after the letter that surfaced yesterday) ,& that they are trying their hardest to get us to fold before that date , but they themselves won't concede up until the very last minute . I'm hoping the BoD hold firm , because if this ever goes to the ICC re true ownership etc , I don't think Jin cheng would stand a chance . Jin cheng shouldn't own 1% of this project as they have done nothing apart from lie , cheat & pay bribes to try to steal it from us .
Firstly until I've heard otherwise I'm expecting the ML . We don't know what the MoM intentions are yet . You'd have to think AVZ BoD know by now . If it was fatal would we have heard something already ? I'm still expecting a TO if we get the ML . China might be forced to make a decent offer .
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 15 users

j.l

Regular
Firstly until I've heard otherwise I'm expecting the ML . We don't know what the MoM intentions are yet . You'd have to think AVZ BoD know by now . If it was fatal would we have heard something already ? I'm still expect a TO if we get the ML . China might be forced to make a decent offer .
Genuine question (and apologies if it's a dumb one) but given previous FIRB intervention, how would a takeover work?

People express buyout targets in $1.50, $2 , $10 etc frequently, but I presume that China wuld be blocked from buying us.
 

Chilla

Regular
Genuine question (and apologies if it's a dumb one) but given previous FIRB intervention, how would a takeover work?

People express buyout targets in $1.50, $2 , $10 etc frequently, but I presume that China wuld be blocked from buying us.
AVZ International which is the holding company of AVZ interests in Dathcom JV sells its shareholding. No FIRB involvement because its purely a commercial sale transaction by a subsidiary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 17 users

wombat74

Top 20
Genuine question (and apologies if it's a dumb one) but given previous FIRB intervention, how would a takeover work?

People express buyout targets in $1.50, $2 , $10 etc frequently, but I presume that China wuld be blocked from buying us.
Well in that case RIO /BHP would be a nice fit . Isn't the asset held by Dathcom? So not a TO of AVZ per se . Someone else could explain it better .
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
The new ministrial decrees removes 1 the splitting of 13359 and 2. restores the whole of 13359 .
According to the minining act the splitting of the tenement was illegal.
AVZ has done all the other pre requisites to obtain the mining licence .
So does the MOM now have 30 days from the additional new decrees to issue the Mining Licence ?
As this is according to the mining act .
There was commentary here on that recently.
Effectively from what I remember, that BOD had the 30 day issuance incorrectly understood.
I think it was for the PE decree to be issued (30 days then enforcement), not the ML.
The actual ML is still dependant on the surface rights calculations and payments. (which is a separate process)

Its unclear from the announcements if we need to formally re-apply for the ML.
Or if we just need to submit some further evidence (of cooperation or a meeting of shareholders).

Which is why I assume the BOD jumped on a plane to sort it out and get clarity.
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 6 users

Chilla

Regular
AVZ International which is the holding company of AVZ interests in Dathcom JV sells its shareholding. No FIRB involvement because its purely a commercial sale transaction by a subsidiary.
The downside of doing this is the tax implications to be paid in both DRC and Australia and how much of the proceeds are left for AVZ after tax and then how much they would distribute to shareholders via a special dividend?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 5 users
1676429641634.png

What the fuck is this @Zeebot.... I asked you months ago to suspend me because I told you I was addicted to this fleabag wanna be journalistic rag. You cunt this is your last chance to suspend me now I've got this evidence on you
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 20 users

Bonsoir

Regular
Firstly until I've heard otherwise I'm expecting the ML . We don't know what the MoM intentions are yet . You'd have to think AVZ BoD know by now . If it was fatal would we have heard something already ? I'm still expecting a TO if we get the ML . China might be forced to make a decent offer .
Her intentions can’t be what she would like it to be, it must be within the constraints of the mining code or all hell will break loose for the DRC mining sector and future investment.
Playing on the big stage now with rules to follow and consequences if you don’t.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12 users
Top Bottom