AVZ Discussion 2022

[Misfits]

 

[CDK222]

We are no longer fighting for the 15%, but for much more. Nigel himself said that CATL can live with 9% and the missing 15% is not an obstacle to starting the project once the ML is there. I'm sure that we are currently fighting for the entire project because the situation has completely slipped away from us. And that unintentionally. AVZ simply relied on people who didn't manage to assert themselves. AVZ trusted them blindly, invested in them and were sure that everything would go the way AVZ imagined. I think that Eckhoff and Hjulich recognized early on that AVZ was being ripped off and therefore left the company because they knew what was to come.
Acknowledging Zijn's 15%, I agree with you, is the only way to move forward on this. Even if AVZ wrongly agree to the procedure and support criminal things. In my opinion, this is our only and last chance. Unfortunately, court cases are gambling these days. Judges often make decisions based on instinct. They also cost a lot of time and money and unfortunately we don't have much of either anymore.

Crawl back under your rock!!!!

 

[Bin59]

.

 

[whales]

I am expecting positive outcomes from the ICC in April, that's if the MOM does not pull the rug before then, to save the scumbags from embarrassing defeat.

The only unexpected thing that matters is Felix taps into his conscience and realises the losses in earnings from Manono that could contribute to 70% of DRC people living in poverty while a few corrupt ministers are benefiting and awards the ML to Dathcom that will not rip the country off . All Imo

 

[Samus]

Someone want to test this on mobile for me please?

ICC International Court of Arbitration / Zijin vs AVZ Countdown

Shows the remaining days until the cheaters & liars & true law abiders are revealed to the world.

icc-zijin-vs-avz-corruption-countdown.netlify.app

Can you put all the latest links in a new thread for swift deployment?

 

[Spikerama]

Can you put all the latest links in a new thread for swift deployment?

Ok how do I make a new thread? I looked at it the other day but it wasn't obvious to me.
_____

edit: Nevermind. Found it. Will do it after tea.

 

[wombat74]

I cant see how anything is unexpected . We are expecting something . What we did expect is now unexpected . So what is expected is something unexpected . In other words no one has a f--king clue what's going on .

 

[Samus]

The IGF must not give in to these kinds of pressures to please the predators. Real change always encounters resistance.

URGENT #lubumbashi , gathering of agents from all constituencies (west, east, plateaux) lubumbashi land affairs to say #NON to < < the imperialism of the IGF > >
@IgfRdc

 

[Samus]

Can someone explain to me this story of AVZ and DRC, the campaign on social networks does not weaken between those who feel cheated etc. what is the story?

 

[ptlas]

I cant see how anything is unexpected . We are expecting something . What we did expect is now unexpected . So what is expected is something unexpected . In other words no one has a f--king clue what's going on .

I expect you're right

 

[Mr Inappropriate]

Continental drift is sometimes unexpected.

 

[John25]

Be nice if our MD or BoD grew a pair & actually did something for their pay ,nothing in 3 months since pic with Mr Pei at lift in AVZ office …like a bunch of grinning idiots …Accountability or we going to drift by into March with SFA news …Sorry but how damn hard is it to get anything done by our BoD , have we actually got anyone in the DRC

 

[TDITD]

Continental drift is sometimes unexpected.

Well that will happen before we get sorted

 

[BEISHA]

@9cardomaha

I havnt had the opportunity to thankyou for your sleuthing talent, sharing alot of pertinent DRC documentation to us all .....as we attempt to put the jig saw pieces together to garner how the fuck AVZ got to where we are now..........

I dont know if this has been requested before or not, so apologies in advance, but are you able to get a copy of the DRC mining law regards to EXPLORATION TENEMENT RENEWAL.

Would like to observe the rules and regulations regards to that in a official capacity.

I know we have covered the topic before regards to CDL, how AVZ poked some holes in the south , but not the north, therefore providing the corruptors with a " loop hole " to steal the north , but i wonder whether that can be done legally under the DRC mining code ........

Normally in Australian mining code, or per aggreement with a JV, a minimum spend is required to be executed within a certain time frame, no stipulation whether it has to be done in a certain area or not, just as long as its done within the tenement boundary.

I betcha thats the same with DRC code too, but would love confirmation of that if possible.

Just cant believe for the love of god, how AVZ could be penalised to this extent, for not poking a few holes in the north of CDL.

With that in mind, cant believe Nigel mentioned that the north had high mica content on the RS without any assay proof ........

I wonder what would of happened to our mining decree if indeed AVZ did put a few drill holes in the north ?

imo

 

[Samus]

With that in mind, cant believe Nigel mentioned that the north had high mica content on the RS without any assay proof ........

I wonder what would of happened to our mining decree if indeed AVZ did put a few drill holes in the north ?

Lucky he's got plenty of AJN shares.

 

[Thunderpony]

Combine everything, then AVZ 75% DRC 25%.
Start fresh, stay above board, and DRC will quickly get international support.

Remove the Chinese completely out of all DRC mining, in exchange for writing off the losses suffered.

Win Win.

 

[Onthefm]

Lucky he's got plenty of AJN shares.

I'll bet money ( not that I have any, tied up in some shitshow pretend mining co) he got those given to him as well.

 

[Mr Inappropriate]

@9cardomaha

I havnt had the opportunity to thankyou for your sleuthing talent, sharing alot of pertinent DRC documentation to us all .....as we attempt to put the jig saw pieces together to garner how the fuck AVZ got to where we are now..........

I dont know if this has been requested before or not, so apologies in advance, but are you able to get a copy of the DRC mining law regards to EXPLORATION TENEMENT RENEWAL.

Would like to observe the rules and regulations regards to that in a official capacity.

I know we have covered the topic before regards to CDL, how AVZ poked some holes in the south , but not the north, therefore providing the corruptors with a " loop hole " to steal the north , but i wonder whether that can be done legally under the DRC mining code ........

Normally in Australian mining code, or per aggreement with a JV, a minimum spend is required to be executed within a certain time frame, no stipulation whether it has to be done in a certain area or not, just as long as its done within the tenement boundary.

I betcha thats the same with DRC code too, but would love confirmation of that if possible.

Just cant believe for the love of god, how AVZ could be penalised to this extent, for not poking a few holes in the north of CDL.

With that in mind, cant believe Nigel mentioned that the north had high mica content on the RS without any assay proof ........

I wonder what would of happened to our mining decree if indeed AVZ did put a few drill holes in the north ?

View attachment 30232




imo

From the 2018 Mining Code
Article 62: Conditions for the renewal of the Research Permit
The Research Permit is renewable provided that the holder :

a. has not failed to comply with its obligations to maintain the validity of the permit under sections 196 to 199 of this Code by submitting:
- proof of the certification of commencement of work duly issued by the Mining Cadastre ;
- proof of payment of annual surface fees per square and tax on the area of mining and hydrocarbon concessions.
b. submits a report of the research carried out during the previous period of validity of his title and the results obtained ;
c. submits a timetable for carrying out the research work ;
d. proves the effective opening of a Research Centre duly certified by the local authorities and the Provincial Mines Division;
e. has not failed in its fiscal, parafiscal and customs obligations;
f. identifies the remaining phases to be completed to reach the final stage of reserve certification and the development of feasibility studies;
g. presents the supplementary budget in relation to the programme of research work corresponding to the remaining phases listed above.

The application for renewal of the Research Permit is sent by the applicant to the Mining Cadastre at least three months and not more than six months before the date of expiry of the Permit, and must contain the the following information:
a. the particulars provided for in subparagraphs b and c of Article 35 of this Code;
b. the number of squares to be renewed and their location ;
c. the identity of the companies ;
d. the nature, number and size of the perimeters of the Research Permits held by the holder and his affiliated companies.

On the occasion of renewal, the holder of the Research Permit automatically renounces at least 50% of the perimeter covered by his permit and must develop and obtain the approval of the revised Mitigation and Rehabilitation Plan for the proposed activity, before continuing the work mining research.

The Mining Regulation determines the terms and conditions of the deposit, admissibility or inadmissibility, the investigation, the decision to renew the Research Permit as well as its registration and display.

 

[wombat74]

@9cardomaha

I havnt had the opportunity to thankyou for your sleuthing talent, sharing alot of pertinent DRC documentation to us all .....as we attempt to put the jig saw pieces together to garner how the fuck AVZ got to where we are now..........

I dont know if this has been requested before or not, so apologies in advance, but are you able to get a copy of the DRC mining law regards to EXPLORATION TENEMENT RENEWAL.

Would like to observe the rules and regulations regards to that in a official capacity.

I know we have covered the topic before regards to CDL, how AVZ poked some holes in the south , but not the north, therefore providing the corruptors with a " loop hole " to steal the north , but i wonder whether that can be done legally under the DRC mining code ........

Normally in Australian mining code, or per aggreement with a JV, a minimum spend is required to be executed within a certain time frame, no stipulation whether it has to be done in a certain area or not, just as long as its done within the tenement boundary.

I betcha thats the same with DRC code too, but would love confirmation of that if possible.

Just cant believe for the love of god, how AVZ could be penalised to this extent, for not poking a few holes in the north of CDL.

With that in mind, cant believe Nigel mentioned that the north had high mica content on the RS without any assay proof ........

I wonder what would of happened to our mining decree if indeed AVZ did put a few drill holes in the north ?

View attachment 30232




imo

I really hope for Nigel's sake AJN do not get the North . He doesn't need that sh1t storm raining down on him .

 

[BEISHA]

From the 2018 Mining Code
Article 62: Conditions for the renewal of the Research Permit
The Research Permit is renewable provided that the holder :

a. has not failed to comply with its obligations to maintain the validity of the permit under sections 196 to 199 of this Code by submitting:
- proof of the certification of commencement of work duly issued by the Mining Cadastre ;
- proof of payment of annual surface fees per square and tax on the area of mining and hydrocarbon concessions.
b. submits a report of the research carried out during the previous period of validity of his title and the results obtained ;
c. submits a timetable for carrying out the research work ;
d. proves the effective opening of a Research Centre duly certified by the local authorities and the Provincial Mines Division;
e. has not failed in its fiscal, parafiscal and customs obligations;
f. identifies the remaining phases to be completed to reach the final stage of reserve certification and the development of feasibility studies;
g. presents the supplementary budget in relation to the programme of research work corresponding to the remaining phases listed above.

The application for renewal of the Research Permit is sent by the applicant to the Mining Cadastre at least three months and not more than six months before the date of expiry of the Permit, and must contain the the following information:
a. the particulars provided for in subparagraphs b and c of Article 35 of this Code;
b. the number of squares to be renewed and their location ;
c. the identity of the companies ;
d. the nature, number and size of the perimeters of the Research Permits held by the holder and his affiliated companies.

On the occasion of renewal, the holder of the Research Permit automatically renounces at least 50% of the perimeter covered by his permit and must develop and obtain the approval of the revised Mitigation and Rehabilitation Plan for the proposed activity, before continuing the work mining research.

The Mining Regulation determines the terms and conditions of the deposit, admissibility or inadmissibility, the investigation, the decision to renew the Research Permit as well as its registration and display.

Thank you good sir.

"On the occasion of renewal, the holder of the Research Permit automatically renounces at least 50% of the perimeter covered by his permit and must develop and obtain the approval of the revised Mitigation and Rehabilitation Plan for the proposed activity, before continuing the work mining research."


Maybe this is the clause that puts a spanner in the works.......


imo