AVZ Discussion 2022

obe wan

Regular
The question is, was the offer that zijn made accepted, or was the 60-day period allowed to elapse
That offer would have lapsed on 20th December ; I was wondering WTF was with cominieres letter, it was asking to pull down the decree, as it claimed AVZ made the decision on renouncing the north but c;aiming they ( cominiere) didn't agree to that.....its a letter which came totally out of the blue and something which should have surfaced months ago, as it would have made things a lot easier, in knocking out DG claim....if of course that was genuinely their concern all along.

Seems a bit of disconnect between DG and Cominiere...comineres letter was dated 7th of December 2022...so this was inside the offer period, we know AJN were after the North.....Zijin were after the 15% of the South; MoP was clearly in on and after gains; with involvement in both of the attempts on north and South....but then cominiere wants decree for the split pulled down; so what happened here then?

Did they find themselves in a situation where they were going shotgun, until Zijins offer dropped on Cominiere desk, which then shifted cominieres focus onto the North, with a 29% holding in a JV and the 15% back at zero cost...., but DG Cami and MoP had been trying to pull AJN through on the North....was one of these dodgy dealings all of a sudden going to be sacrificed for a more lucrative one?

How fast were cominiere expecting to get these decrees pulled down...hardly within a 2 week period ( between 7th and 20th) ; did zijin offer an extension to the 60 days hence why we seen a late drive for the decree to the north to be nullified which would see AJNs application scrapped, but potential negotiations grounds created, where by Zijin withdraw the 15% claim on the south, ROFR goes to AVZ, handbrake release, no ICC and the project back in motion, but in exchange that Zijin and Cominiere JV takes the north.

Hopefully cominiere / zijin and Cami have beached themselves now, with a dose of ‘fuck around and find out’; I reckon today's article is one they’ve wished hadn't surfaced
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Thinking
Reactions: 34 users

Remark

Top 20

Samus

Top 20
Here he is the disgusting cunt.

https://laitimes.com/en/article/3ms6j_43h70.html… All that money and he still insists on trying to defraud RDC and steal resources without paying a fair price. What a truly dirty and shameful man. CHEN Jinghe is a national disgrace.

Pardon my French - sorry about that. 😮‍💨
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Haha
Reactions: 31 users

CashKing

Regular
Anyone know why the AVZ logo has been removed from the entrance piece?

It's been that way since beginning of last year I think?
Zijin probably stole it, They are good stealing shit it seems…

Nice to see some actual Site pics however..

GLTAH
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12 users

Ashlee

Regular
At the roadshow it was mentioned that the north contained higher Mica. There was also a very clear point made that the vast majority of our CURRENT value was in Roche, basically saying loosing the north would not effect our current value much. At the time I felt this was a clear message to prepare ourselves to lose the north, but all will still be OK. Did others who heard this get the same impression? It sounded very deliberate and was not just a passing comment or off the cuff remark. I spoke to other share holders afterwards, most of which didn't take much notice of this information.
Jazz yes I agree with your summation I was some what surprised by Nigel’s high Micra comments
 
  • Like
Reactions: 16 users
Have we seen the document where AVZ allegedly renounces the northern section?
No, 8196 is the document we are looking for.

Screenshot_20230207_143510_DuckDuckGo.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 users

Thunderpony

27 µg per 100 mL
Yeah but I'm not sure how to implement the code into a website. It's currently working locally in my browsers.
I ttred it on a Wordpress Free page but WordPress strips out half the code cos they don't allow java script on free sites.
So it borks the script.

Happy to hear some ideas if anyone has any.
Ask ChatGTP?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 4 users
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 3 users
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
We probably shouldn't ask how you got these right? Haha
The Cadastre has a record-keeping role and has to make these documents available as per the Mining Code (or was it the Mining Regs? Either/Or).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Samus

Top 20
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 18 users

Thunderpony

27 µg per 100 mL
avz.JPG
 
  • Haha
  • Thinking
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users

Thunderpony

27 µg per 100 mL
So Felix is a Key Executive?
 
  • Haha
  • Thinking
Reactions: 3 users
Apropos of nothing, when Mr Inappropriate gets a like from @Mr Clean, Mr Inappropriate gets a little tingle in his nutsack.
BE3DA2C3-DD1F-41AC-9789-74470A743F9C.jpeg
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 6 users
The Cadastre has a record-keeping role and has to make these documents available as per the Mining Code (or was it the Mining Regs? Either/Or).
The letter from Zijin states its confidential?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 users

ptlas

Regular
There's that crane with the sick green rims, good to see it made it off the truck.

P. S. Fuck Zijin and there grubby tactics, I'm over it. Give them the North, give us our ML, open to market again get this dog to $1.50 + so I can get the fuck out with a big CGT payment and still have the mortgage to pay.

P. P. S. Fuck Felix and the DRC being open for investment preaching, the only thing that's open is their own pockets and pie holes.
This ain't gonna end for a while.
Reading this thread tonight, I was once again struck by the quality of the posts and the intelligence and ingenuity of many here.
So hang on in there Disco and keep up your positive contributions.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 18 users
This isn’t quite it (but thank you anyway). Where’s a the document with a signature at the bottom from an authorised AVZ representative?
Document 8196 is the application that was submitted to renouncement of the Northern section.

Sorry thought that was what you were after.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
No, 8196 is the document we are looking for.

View attachment 29444
Sorry the part i was referring to is translated below.

"Having regard to Declaration No 8196 of the partial surrender of the Research Permit No.
13359 submitted by DATHCOM MINING SA dated 01/04/2022"
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
No, 8196 is the document we are looking
This isn’t quite it (but thank you anyway). Where’s a the document with a signature at the bottom from an authorised AVZ representative?
Sammy is correct. The initial decree states that the partial waiver by Dathcom was made in declaration no 8196. That is the document we are looking for.
20230213_224201.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 5 users

Jazz

Regular
Jazz yes I agree with your summation I was some what surprised by Nigel’s high Micra comments
Ashlee, I think the reason it struck me was that for a number of years Nigel had spoken about the north with great excitement and expectation. To hear him talk it down for no particular reason was significant. Particularly as it wasn’t due to it being forced out of him by tough questioning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11 users
Top Bottom