AVZ Discussion 2022

[Carlos Danger]

Excellent work Danger

 

[Carlos Danger]

 

[Carlos Danger]

View attachment 25883
View attachment 25884

If there are now audios of the illegal selling of Cominiere's assets to Zijin that weren't available before then the NSA has entered the chat imo

 

[Mr Inappropriate]

The licence is awarded to Dathcom, not AVZ.

Agree - I did’t think I had suggested otherwise.

 

[Dazmac66]

If there are now audios of the illegal selling of Cominiere's assets to Zijin that weren't available before then the NSA has entered the chat imo
View attachment 25885

Biden whispers to Felix, "just leave it with me big fella, I'll get my boys and girls on it"!. Let's hope so.

 

[Mr Inappropriate]

If there are now audios of the illegal selling of Cominiere's assets to Zijin that weren't available before then the NSA has entered the chat imo
View attachment 25885

As I’ve posted here previously Manono is a massive and strategically important asset. There is zero chance that the governments of the US and China are simply watching from the sidelines.

 

[Carlos Danger]

Biden whispers to Felix, "just leave it with me big fella, I'll get my boys and girls on it"!. Let's hope so.

Everything the light touches is your kingdom snow white

 

[Carlos Danger]

As I’ve posted here previously Manono is a massive and strategically important asset. There is zero chance that the governments of the US and China are simply watching from the sidelines.

Support Independent Journalism with a donation (Paypal, BTC, USDT, ETH) -

Help to support independent journalism: We need donations to provide you with factual news, bear server cost, and pay editor and journalists.

emeatribune.com

The White House sees Africa — a continent of exceptional diversity, vitality and promise — as a critical ally in the decades to come, as the world emerges from the coronavirus to face threats like nationalism, climate change and migration.

The Biden administration believes “The summit is really rooted in the recognition that Africa is a key geopolitical player and one that is shaping our present and will shape our future,” a senior official said last week.

In 2019, African leaders convened with another leader of a superpower: Vladimir Putin of Russia, who invited the heads of state to Sochi on the Black Sea. Chinese leader Xi Jinping has also been making overtures to counterparts on the continent.

This week’s summit has had an “unspoken but clear objective,” Moore says: “We are a better partner for Africa than China.”

At a business summit with African leaders on Wednesday, Biden reminded them that the United States provided 231 million coronavirus vaccine doses to the continent. “The United States is all in on Africa’s future,” Biden said.

His remarks did not mention China, but the implication would not have been lost on anyone in the room. Speaking to reporters earlier in the day, National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said the president’s goal is to counter “China’s malign influence on the continent.”

“The global crisis on climate cannot be solved by America alone,” Moore says. Not only does Africa represent dozens of votes when it comes to any international agreements, it has the resources necessary to wean human civilization off carbon-based fuels.

Here, again, business opportunities await. Africa “has the potential to reshape the supply chain for many clean energy options,” a report published in October by the consulting firm Deloitte found. “Some African economies could even become pivotal suppliers of energy minerals and natural gas in the immediate term.”

The West needs minerals like cobalt and manganese to make solar panels, batteries and wind turbines. These are found in abundance across the continent.

 

[BEISHA]

The smaller percentage to CATL is to maintain control

Think back to when Zijin, the AFR and their lemmings on Twitter were all gloating that no one would have control. Do you really think they would do all their bullshit to get 15% just to have the awarding of the ML to Dathcom fall apart?

AVZ management have stated numerous times that ownership isn't the problem with getting the licence. It's 100% about Mupande and AJN's attempt to rat fuck us out of CDL.

Remember CAMI looked at ownership before deciding to approve the application as part of the favourable opinion process. Also the Minister of Mines wouldn't have awarded us the ML for RD that management initially accepted if ownership was an issue imo

From the AGM:

What happened after ML Decree, spurious yet we’re in suspension. What’s the main issue for ML – is it Dathomir, is Zijin ICC arbitration 15, dispute with exploration rights?

A: Lot of players in vogue here in country, lot of hatchet jobs being done – President had a bad view from being ill advised by detractors (e.g. we hadn’t done anything, didn’t have money experience, and were speculators). Detractors continuing, but slowly slowly we’re working to remove the blocks.

We knew Chinese would have a crack, but we did not expect parts of DRC government to be in on it?

A: Nor did we - “we thought it was gambit by Chinese groups to get project cheapest way. We weren’t aware it was also elements of the government complicit. We can’t go into it, but rest assured those people are being turned over within meetings with real information is being shared, and people put on the spot.

Collusion between all those 3 – namely Zijin, Jin Cheng, CAMI?

A: That would be astute thought

Issue that a portion of mines directorate said we hadn’t done the work on the northern tenement area, and shouldn’t get the north?

A: That’s not within the mining code. So 13359 should be retained in its entirety – however the northern area may need to come under a separate exploration tenement, even though that’s not the established process. – We know who’s behind this (e.g. DG CAMI)

What about AJN having a crack

A: “their premise is that we’ve returned the northern tenement to government. We haven’t. Draw a conclusion out of that”.

Interview NF mentioned once mentioned once decree issued 10 day period before Court could issue the licence. What happened?

A: This was a misunderstanding. As soon as your documentation was in order and issued, this talk of periods was regarding the ministerial decree. Other steps in way of ML – CAMI have held up the invoicing, illegally in our view.

View attachment 25873
View attachment 25874
View attachment 25875

An excellent recite of the AGM mate......and totally agree.

Look , all i was trying to convey was, surely AVZ / DATHCOM have to come to a agreement with CATH regards to interim reduction of their 24% before the ML is awarded, assuming also that the full permit 13559 is granted too .

Cause as it currently stands....

AVZ = 36%, CATH = 24%, DRC / COM = 25%

( DATHOMIR 15% is in dispute with ICC )

( PRE EMPTION 15% is in dispute with ICC too, but not a stumbling block for ML )

CATH needs to agree to 9% interest in the short term to allow AVZ / Dathcom = 51% to operate RD.

CATH / JV agreement was extended to 31/12/22, we are due for a update on that.

Will it be another extension, or could it be confirmation that CATH is happy for 24% to be reduced to 9%, whilst ICC arbitration plays out ?

imo

 

[Carlos Danger]

An excellent recite of the AGM mate......and totally agree.

Look , all i was trying to convey was, surely AVZ / DATHCOM have to come to a agreement with CATH regards to interim reduction of their 24% before the ML is awarded, assuming also that the full permit 13559 is granted too .

Cause as it currently stands....

AVZ = 36%, CATH = 24%, DRC / COM = 25%

( DATHOMIR 15% is in dispute with ICC )

( PRE EMPTION 15% is in dispute with ICC too, but not a stumbling block for ML )

CATH needs to agree to 9% interest in the short term to allow AVZ / Dathcom = 51% to operate RD.

CATH / JV agreement was extended to 31/12/22, we are due for a update on that.

Will it be another extension, or could it be confirmation that CATH is happy for 24% to be reduced to 9%, whilst ICC arbitration plays out ?

imo

It's the applicant for the ML that needs 51% so Dathcom has that imo

Under no circumstances can management allow us to go under 51%. I have full confidence that they will make sure that is the end result. Otherwise the other partners will vote against us and bully us into selling our stake to them by making sure we never see dividends.

 

[DoubleA]

Agree - I did’t think I had suggested otherwise.

What I am saying is that it is Dathcom that is the applicant and would require 51%.

 

[tonster66]

View attachment 25905

What I am saying is that it is Dathcom that is the applicant and would require 51%.

Yep and Dathcom has a confirmed 60% by the IGF

 

[Carlos Danger]

Yep and Dathcom has a confirmed 60% by the IGF

AVZI holds 75% of Dathcom. 60% of which is irrevocable as confirmed by the IGF report.

 

[BEISHA]

It's the applicant for the ML that needs 51% so Dathcom has that imo

Under no circumstances can management allow us to go under 51%. I have full confidence that they will make sure that is the end result. Otherwise the other partners will vote against us and bully us into selling our stake to them by making sure we never see dividends.

Lol, this shit show is fucking my mind, i was writing those previous posts with the assumption that AVZ / DATHCOM had inked a deal with CATH, but of course they havnt, so AVZ DATHCOM at this stage has 60%...... control not a issue for ML as you rightly state.

So just a matter of Cath happy to come to terms for 9% in the interim............or we find a alternative JV ( possibly US.....my preference all along )


Sorry, my bad.................

 

[Mr Inappropriate]

View attachment 25905

What I am saying is that it is Dathcom that is the applicant and would require 51%.

Perhaps it was my use of the word “we” that caused the confusion. It‘s all good - we are in violent agreement.

 

[Carlos Danger]

Lol, this shit show is fucking my mind, i was writing those previous posts with the assumption that AVZ / DATHCOM had inked a deal with CATH, but of course they havnt, so AVZ DATHCOM at this stage has 60%...... control not a issue for ML as you rightly state.

So just a matter of Cath happy to come to terms for 9% in the interim............or we find a alternative JV ( possibly US.....my preference all along )


Sorry, my bad.................

View attachment 25907

View attachment 25908

Yeah it is confusing. I studied accounting and finance so have a bit of an advantage with this stuff.

You keep referring to AVZ / Dathcom which is where you may be getting mixed up

Just in case anyone isn't clear about the ownership structure it currently stands at:

AVZ shareholders own AVZ

AVZ owns 100% of a subsidiary called AVZI

AVZI owns 75% of a joint venture called Dathcom

Dathcom is the applicant for the mining licence

 

[Flight996]

CATH needs to agree to 9% interest in the short term to allow AVZ / Dathcom = 51% to operate RD.

CATH / JV agreement was extended to 31/12/22, we are due for a update on that.

Will it be another extension, or could it be confirmation that CATH is happy for 24% to be reduced to 9%, whilst ICC arbitration plays out ?

Hi Beisha

The only issue I see in the 9% scenario is that of sufficient funding to build the mine and its infrastructure. The ML is dependent on a number of pre-conditions, including evidence of sufficient operating funds.
If CATH agreed to 9%, rather than 24% CAPEX funding then AVZ receives 15% less cash for CAPEX. There needs to be a top-up from somewhere.
I can only guess that AVZ could get another equity funder, or maybe consider another bargain basement CR (and again leave its retail shareholders with little but dilution). That would be as welcome as Mr Putin at a Ukranian wedding.

Cheers
F

 

[BEISHA]

Hi Beisha

The only issue I see in the 9% scenario is that of sufficient funding to build the mine and its infrastructure. The ML is dependent on a number of pre-conditions, including evidence of sufficient operating funds.
If CATH agreed to 9%, rather than 24% CAPEX funding then AVZ receives 15% less cash for CAPEX. There needs to be a top-up from somewhere.
I can only guess that AVZ could get another equity funder, or maybe consider another bargain basement CR (and again leave its retail shareholders with little but dilution). That would be as welcome as Mr Putin at a Ukranian wedding.

Cheers
F

Yes , agree.

If i remember , other posters mentioned CATH could possibly pay a "pre - payment " for goods rendered ?

CR is definitely another option as you mentioned, but more dilution.

What about bank finance ?


imo

 

[Carlos Danger]

Hi Beisha

The only issue I see in the 9% scenario is that of sufficient funding to build the mine and its infrastructure. The ML is dependent on a number of pre-conditions, including evidence of sufficient operating funds.
If CATH agreed to 9%, rather than 24% CAPEX funding then AVZ receives 15% less cash for CAPEX. There needs to be a top-up from somewhere.
I can only guess that AVZ could get another equity funder, or maybe consider another bargain basement CR (and again leave its retail shareholders with little but dilution). That would be as welcome as Mr Putin at a Ukranian wedding.

Cheers
F

Yes , agree.

If i remember , other posters mentioned CATH could possibly pay a "pre - payment " for goods rendered ?

CR is definitely another option as you mentioned, but more dilution.

What about bank finance ?


imo

Finance in Dathcom's name most likely. With whoever ends up with the 'disputed' percentage obligated to assume the debt / pay it off. AVZ can act as the guarantor as we control Dathcom and are most likely to end up with the 15% from Dathomir before then selling it to CATL.

I assume something like this is already in place for the 15% from Cominiere which AVZ has so far never owned. Doing it this way would come with a premium but the project's numbers make it easily doable imo

 

[Flight996]

Finance in Dathcom's name most likely. With whoever ends up with the 'disputed' percentage obligated to assume the debt / pay it off. AVZ can act as the guarantor as we control Dathcom and are most likely to end up with the 15% from Dathomir before then selling it to CATL.

I assume something like this is already in place for the 15% from Cominiere which AVZ has so far never owned. Doing it this way would come with a premium but the project's numbers make it easily doable imo

Hi Carlos

I am unsure about Dathcon or AVZ getting debt financing over a tenement that remains in dispute, despite its compelling economics and quality of its resource base. You know what international bankers are like. They need you to prove your project don't need finance in order to get finance...and then they screw you over.

I still think a CR remains a viable option, providing there is a SPP attached. If the board thinks it can screw over its retail shareholders yet again, it will have significantly underestimated the level of disquiet over its performance.

Cheers
F