Industrial accellerator act delayed again. EU can't be relied on, Sweden can't be relied on. how does this project proceed under these conditions?
resourceeu cannot be relied on at all until there is a black and white positive development
what is there to be positive about with any of this at the moment? where is the next good news coming from?
@Gvan any thoughts?
assume no overseas expansion news until the FEED study is done if alt locations are a duplication of this
is there anyone else still reading this forum?
The IAA is a major legislative change, which has understandably created some friction between member states. I believe they’ll iron it out shortly by opting for a “Made with EU” rather than a “Made in EU” approach. This means Talga will have competition from Korea and Japan, but considering where we are right now, this is still a massive positive for Talga.
That said, the IAA should really only be looked at for Talga’s future expansions beyond the initial line, so a one week delay should be met with a shrug. I wouldn't be looking at the IAA as a near-term catalyst to bolster the share price - This is only the legislative proposal; it still needs to follow a similar course to the CRMA (which, if you recall, had several decisions before eventually being published in the Official Journal). It is a drawn-out process, but the timing works well for Talga by driving demand for expansion beyond 5ktpa. The legislation short-term will not do much for us, but long term it could definitely be company-making.
REsourceEU is already adopted and should be viewed as more imminent, especially considering what stage Talga is in compared to other battery-grade graphite strategic projects.
The company has already drilled out and defined the resource, become fully permitted, developed downstream technology critically lacking in the West, completed multi-year customer qualification programs, and received a strong viability rating under the UNFC framework, which is specifically linked to the CRMA in order to aid with financing decisions.
Everything is largely in place except the financing.
What does Talga look like to the EU after the IL budget ran empty? A tier-one strategic project ready to go to market, but underfunded. This is exactly the type of situation RESourceEU was established to address.
Therefore, we should still expect support. The fact that the company did not receive support from the IL program actually strengthens the case. The EU is looking for projects that are “sure things,” and I don’t believe there’s a better graphite strategic project. Logically, they’re going to back Talga before an African resource still developing its anode technology, or any of the novel approaches to graphite production (even if the EU loves an innovation project, however unnecessary).
In the meantime, the company is still progressing FEED and still has a decent runway to secure favourable financing before it’s completed.