Surely they’re bought. Wouldn’t really serve much purpose for voting just moving them around from someone that would already vote for Carrick. Unless it’s just to say look I’ve got more than Nigel now but no one would care anyway.I would be interested to know how resource cap investments acquired their 57 + million shares? Did they acquire all of them by purchasing them for a monetary valve, or did they also acquire a majority of them by being gifted them?
It would be great to know, how and from whom they were actually acquired from?
Cheers,
Nells x
One thing is for certain, I will definitely be notifying ASIC & FIRB of the mysterious changes to the AVZ top twenty holdings , and would encourage all others to do the same!
Cheers,
Nellie
They reached out to shareholders to offer buying them off market from the shareholders for peanuts... well documented and reported.I would be interested to know how resource cap investments acquired their 57 + million shares? Did they acquire all of them by purchasing them for a monetary valve, or did they also acquire a majority of them by being gifted them?
It would be great to know, how and from whom they were actually acquired from?
Cheers,
Nells x
Blocking stake for any potential TO 50%? Alternatively profit when we do so gets paid either way.Surely they’re bought. Wouldn’t really serve much purpose for voting just moving them around from someone that would already vote for Carrick. Unless it’s just to say look I’ve got more than Nigel now but no one would care anyway.
Like him visiting an all you can eat Chinese buffet it won’t be anywhere near enough to fulfil his needs. So it potentially looks like he just wasted half a mil on getting another percent or two but it still won’t be anywhere near enough to the mark to matter.
Utterly bizarre behaviour. Unless he’s expecting a buy out at some point in which case sucks to be whoever sold them to him.
Agreed, All other votes being equal, 57m votes changes nothing.Blocking stake for any potential TO 50%? Alternatively profit when we do so gets paid either way.
He lied at the agm that avz was completely fucked and worthless, turns around and spends 570 + costs. Carrick a world class liar and scumbag. AGM voting won’t change much I agree
That would require the same 50% needed to get on the boardBlocking stake for any potential TO 50%? Alternatively profit when we do so gets paid either way.
He lied at the agm that avz was completely fucked and worthless, turns around and spends 570 + costs. Carrick a world class liar and scumbag. AGM voting won’t change much I agree
700mil rings a bell .What was the maximum shares they offered to buy?
As much as anyone wants to think this is nefarious, there is nothing illegal about having your holdings in custody under a nominee account. The custodian is required to maintain records of the beneficial owner/s of the account under custody.One thing is for certain, I will definitely be notifying ASIC & FIRB of the mysterious changes to the AVZ top twenty holdings , and would encourage all others to do the same!
Cheers,
Nellie
Lol ok so they got no where near that, bunch of sooky cunts700mil rings a bell .
Being just shy of 20% of the SOI so as not to raise the attention of FIRB ....possibly????700mil rings a bell .
FIRB threshold is 10% and wouldn’t apply here as Resource Fatital Investments is domiciled in AustraliaBeing just shy of 20% of the SOI so as not to raise the attention of FIRB ....possibly????
Just thought FIRB "might" look further behind Carrotdick and Resource Capital Investments and investigate who might be backing the cntFIRB threshold is 10% and wouldn’t apply here as Resource Fatital Investments is domiciled in Australia
CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 606
Prohibition on certain acquisitions of relevant interests in voting shares
Acquisition of relevant interests in voting shares through transaction entered into by or on behalf of person acquiring relevant interest
(1) A person must not acquire a relevant interest in issued voting shares in a company if:
(a) the company is:
(i) a listed company; or
(ii) an unlisted company with more than 50 members; and
(b) the person acquiring the interest does so through a transaction in relation to securities entered into by or on behalf of the person; and
(c) because of the transaction, that person's or someone else's voting power in the company increases:
(i) from 20% or below to more than 20%
The 10% is the level Yibin were denied at because it gives the holder an option of an automatic board seat. Which would serve Carrick's purpose anyway if he got to that.Just thought FIRB "might" look further behind Carrotdick and Resource Capital Investments and investigate who might be backing the cnt
But I get that the entity is domiciled in Oz
Not sure about your 10% threshold though
The magic number is when the shareholding moves from below 20% to more than 20%......that's the trigger point
Well I thought it was
CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 606
Prohibition on certain acquisitions of relevant interests in voting shares
Acquisition of relevant interests in voting shares through transaction entered into by or on behalf of person acquiring relevant interest
(1) A person must not acquire a relevant interest in issued voting shares in a company if:
(a) the company is:
(i) a listed company; or
(ii) an unlisted company with more than 50 members; and
(b) the person acquiring the interest does so through a transaction in relation to securities entered into by or on behalf of the person; and
(c) because of the transaction, that person's or someone else's voting power in the company increases:
(i) from 20% or below to more than 20%
GotchaThe 10% is the level Yibin were denied at because it gives the holder an option of an automatic board seat. Which would serve Carrick's purpose anyway if he got to that.
And yes I can read the legislation I quoted that is for any holder regardless of domiciled jurisdiction. Anything above this is prohibited unless the acquisition occurs via a specified exception (such as a takeover bid, scheme of arrangement or with target shareholder approval).
Just ask Gina how her LTR holding is going
Might be super coincidental. But when Rio checked in at DRC a few month back. Check thier share price appreciation from that point onwards. I feel like it’s just purely coincidental. But you never know.