Point Piper,
Dont you need to be a "Fit and Proper Person" to sit on a Board.
Just a question.
Regards,
SilentOne.
AVZ Discussion 2022
- Thread starter GazDix
- Start date
Dont you need to be a "Fit and Proper Person" to sit on a Board.
Just a question.
Regards,
SilentOne.
Rediah
Regular
Bin59
Regular
Perhaps the company should release an announcement saying they've been in contact with FIRB and Govt officials regarding state backed hostile takeovers and they are happy with the level of support they've been given of Australia's strategic mineral deposit under the AUS/US Minerals Security Partnership?
Scoota30
Regular
Understand the skepticism but it's certainly not out of the picture. I would beg to differ, RIO among other western mining companies have spoken about diversifying into Africa and other higher risk jurisdictions.
Attachments
The rumour bullshit mill has been in full swing since this sh1t show started . Curiously has ramped up since we delisted . Not to mention the load of bollocks that has come through my inbox over these many months re favorable AVZ . But it's all hush hush . Please don't tell anyone . Keep it to yourself. Doubt I'm the only one that's been fed this rubbish .
Bray
Regular
Rio will NEVER buy this - its already a shit stain in the jocks. Gina ain't no goose
Mute22
Regular
Likewise.
Makes me thing somebody wants shareholders to just shut up while they collect a paycheck.
Scoota30
Regular
Gina?
Bray
Regular
Yeah both of em were hunting lithium. Neither dumb enough to touch Manono
RHyNO
Regular
It’s not the place or the politicsthat’s the problem. As Nigel points out frequently. And it’s not our BOD best BOD on the ASX. Other companies are having no issue getting things up and running. And we have an MOU en route. New Ann coming next week confirming. Wink wink
Has it been explained how this MoU thing actually works ?
I would imagine it is an "if - then" statement. If you give us the mining licence then we sell the project to China for $X billion. Until then we proceed through to the duration of court cases.
I'd suggest it's more something like agreeing to temporarily reinstate the licence over the southern tenement area, whilst awaiting the decisions of the international courts to decide who gets what.
Makes the most sense. Hopefully for the whole lot, God knows why you would want to try develop/Split sections with Cominiere/Zijin still in the area.
Absolute nightmare
Mr_Tones83
Regular
That's just what they've been ordered to do by ICSID interim orders though. Shouldn't need an MOU for that
Similar threads
