When you think about it, you would think the firm name would provide the perfect caveat emptor defence.They sound pretty dodgy, no disrespect to you Dodgy-knees.
A former Australian law firm, which faced a class action lawsuit in 2016 over allegations of failing to disclose risks in an acquisition!
OMG! With that sort of representation, I reckon I'll be doing solitary confinement in Cell Block D for the foreseeable future.
I’m not sure whether I should even bother to prepare a legal defence, or just start fashioning a prison shiv out of a broken Akida dev board.
On the bright side, by the time they manage to secure my release, the share price should be booming!
View attachment 92884
BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
You mean they're building prison cells out of plaque now?On a slightly more serious note, I've just started listening to this new podcast with Eric Mazzoleni (VP Industrial & Embedded IoT Sales Europe, Qualcomm Germany).
It only dropped about 5 days ago.
I’ve only made it about 15 minutes in so far, mostly because I’ve been busy planning how to avoid a 30-year jail term without having to tunnel out of my cell using my toothbrush.
From what I've heard so far,Qualcomm is clearly positioning Dragonwing toward the same verticals Akida excels in. Eric even discusses machines that can be asked questions and can respond with how to fix the issue, fully at the edge, with ultra-low power at industrial endpoints and in battery and thermal restricted devices.
If there’s one silicon company where Akida 2000 drops in and actually makes strategic sense at scale, I believe it’s Qualcomm.
I honestly can’t think of a more natural match than BrainChip + Qualcomm.
I'd love it if someone else could take a listen and share your thoughts.
S7:E9: taking away Edge AI complexity
In this episode of IoT Unplugged, Caitlin Gittins speaks with Eric Mazzoleni, Vice President, Industrial and Embedded IOT Sales Europe at Qualcomm.www.iotinsider.com
View attachment 92889
Bravo
If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its biceps💪!
Exactly! With a name like Sly & Wriggle the warning label is already printed on the letterhead!
“Your Honour, we literally TOLD them we were shifty. It was right there in the branding.”
You were right all along that BRN should have been flogging chips as a lead up to IP if they have volumes. No one even a giant like Parsons wants to jump straight into IP. Its risky and the time to produce from design could be 2 to 3 years via IP.
What happens if these chips don't get sold? I think assuming that they will sell out is another false hope.I see what's unfolding as nothing but good news... we need money to make money. If we have companies wanting to buy our Chips, get money and make the Chips. We will start getting good returns late next year when they are sold. My understanding is that we already have guaranteed sales... So let's make plenty of Chips and moneyChip making is expensive, that's why I think we have been waiting for guaranteed sales before going in this direction... just my Opinion.
Pom down under
Top 20
So a pathetic total off 24 million traded today and I wonder how many were retail sells? So you pathetic bunch off low life scum shorters I recon you can that that and shove it where the sun don’t shine
Hi Bravo,
If you are sending emails to Trevor and not receiving any professional responses, I would strongly suggest ringing HQ
in the US and formally complain, it's not good enough.
Investor Relations is a two-way street, some people on this forum and the other rag didn't mind bagging Tony here in
Perth, so I'd highlight the issue you're having directly to Sean.
Tech.
If you are sending emails to Trevor and not receiving any professional responses, I would strongly suggest ringing HQ
in the US and formally complain, it's not good enough.
Investor Relations is a two-way street, some people on this forum and the other rag didn't mind bagging Tony here in
Perth, so I'd highlight the issue you're having directly to Sean.
Tech.
Similar threads
