Pom down under
Top 20
I think he must be thinking he is fooling us with his posts, which is even more pathetic than his posts
Last edited:
BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
Many great posts being put forward, especially from our overseas poster Frangi, does this lady ever sleep 
anyway thanks from me.
Why no ASX announcements !? well it's very obvious why not.
Antonio has simply had enough of the ASX, their attitude, their nastiness towards our company.
How can we provide genuine answers to material questions relating to potential revenue, when we as a company have absolutely no idea what sort of numbers could be potentially involved regarding IP revenue, chip volume orders, product sales equating to royalty revenues etc, we simply can't, so frustration has boiled over, this is not how things are done in "the USA".
Can I see things changing, absolutely not.
This pattern of newsfeed will be sourced from the current channels, accept it or not,
that's your choice moving forward.
Brainchip continues making forward strides, as frustrating as it is, we have proven, disruptive technology, time will eventually be our friend, trust your instincts.
Tech
anyway thanks from me.Why no ASX announcements !? well it's very obvious why not.
Antonio has simply had enough of the ASX, their attitude, their nastiness towards our company.
How can we provide genuine answers to material questions relating to potential revenue, when we as a company have absolutely no idea what sort of numbers could be potentially involved regarding IP revenue, chip volume orders, product sales equating to royalty revenues etc, we simply can't, so frustration has boiled over, this is not how things are done in "the USA".
Can I see things changing, absolutely not.
This pattern of newsfeed will be sourced from the current channels, accept it or not,
that's your choice moving forward.
Brainchip continues making forward strides, as frustrating as it is, we have proven, disruptive technology, time will eventually be our friend, trust your instincts.
Tech
Last edited:
Frangipani
Top 20
Here is more information about the Edge AI Challenge called Earth Guardians, organised by the Edge AI Foundation in partnership with Hackster.io, who “are calling on innovators to design edge AI solutions that solve real environmental problems - from wildlife protection and deforestation detection to marine ecosystem monitoring.”
Love this!
I am really psyched for this new EDGE AI Challenge with Hackster.io called Earth Guardians. | Pete Bernard
I am really psyched for this new EDGE AI Challenge with Hackster.io called Earth Guardians. This will bring together a range of environmental sensing #edegai technologies that will not only help drive industry forward but also apply this tech - #tinyml, #neuromorphic, #aivision, #aiot, and...
Edge AI Earth Guardians
Where edge audio-visual intelligence meets conservation action. With EDGE AI FOUNDATION.
www.hackster.io
MDhere
Top 20
Agree Tech however like other companies, Brainchip need to learn how to announce things such as Contracts with $ values (price sensitive as its $ in our kitty) , collaborations with other companies (using a non-price sensitive) and so on. To simply say Antonio and other usa management have had a gutful of the asx I think that's a little rich as firstly I have not heard them say this and secondly as I mentioned early there are companies I know of that can successfully announce price sensitive and non price sensitive items without the inspector clueso that goes on here.Many great posts being put forward, especially from our overseas poster Frangi, does this lady ever sleep
Why no ASX announcements !? well it's very obvious why not.
Antonio has simply had enough of the ASX, their attitude, their nastiness towards our company.
How can we provide genuine answers to material questions relating to potential revenue, when we as a company have absolutely no idea what sort of numbers could be potentially involved regarding IP revenue, chip volume orders, product sales equating to royalty revenues etc, we simply can't, so frustration has boiled over, this is not how things are done in "the USA".
That is the issue, management have had a gutsful, but in my opinion not all management, I could name one individual, but will behave myself and zip my mouth.
Can I see things changing, absolutely not.
This pattern of newsfeed will be sourced from the current channels, accept it or not,
that's your choice moving forward.
Brainchip continues making forward strides, as frustrating as it is, we have proven, disruptive technology, time will eventually be our friend, trust your instincts.
Tech
Of course we all know Brainchip is on the road to success but the market also deserves to know we exist on the map and asx is a form that investors take note of. New investors may have no idea who or what Brainchip is so they not going to know look us up in X or linkedin or even Brainchips website why would they.
Don't get me wrong I'm all for it moving to the USA when the current Australian (and overseas) investors can be satisfied that management are acting in our best interest in making this happen and in doing so it still needs to address announcements on the asx for the proper exposure that it deserves.
So having said this I do believe that if other companies can master their asx announcement price sensitive and non-price sensitive on the asx, so should Brainchip and not be of the mentality of a gutful and stuff the asx. That's not very professional either in my view. I hope this information about Antonio that you mention is not right, if it is I certainly would be disappointed in that attitude and take.
I do agree with your last line though -
Brainchip continues making forward strides, as frustrating as it is, we have proven, disruptive technology, time will eventually be our friend, trust your instincts.
When thieves fall out:
The $100 Million AI Talent War Signals the Start of a New Tech Economy
Massive pay offers for AI researchers show companies expect AI to transform industries, reshape the job market, and drive the economy.
Tyler Flores
rtificial intelligence is already transforming daily life, from AI-generated content to customer service chatbots to automated medical diagnostics. In the background, AI is being used to optimize shipping routes, detect financial fraud, and assist in military planning.
The technology’s growing reach has also sparked warnings. Pope Leo recently urged world leaders to regulate AI development to avoid unintended consequences. He called it a tool that could both improve society and undermine human rights if left unchecked.
As AI becomes more capable and more deeply embedded in industries, control over its development is becoming a key global issue. The talent war is one part of that larger struggle.
How It Affects Reader
The enormous salaries being offered suggest AI is hardly a passing trend. It’s a technology expected to reshape the economy and labor market in fundamental ways.
Many jobs that rely on repetitive tasks, data analysis, or content creation could be transformed or replaced by AI systems. Companies investing billions in AI are looking to automate processes, cut costs, and increase efficiency. That means some roles may disappear while others evolve, forcing workers to adapt to new technologies or shift into new industries altogether.
At the same time, the AI boom is creating new, high-paying jobs for those with specialized skills. But the growing gap between those able to participate in the AI economy and those at risk of being replaced raises concerns about inequality and workforce disruption.
The fact that companies are willing to spend $100 million to hire AI experts sends a clear message. AI will be a driving force in how businesses operate, how economies grow, and how jobs are defined in the years ahead.
It's a dog-eat-dog world out there ... and we can be sure they continue to sniff around BRN.
The $100 Million AI Talent War Signals the Start of a New Tech Economy
Massive pay offers for AI researchers show companies expect AI to transform industries, reshape the job market, and drive the economy.
Tyler Flores
| A new chapter in Silicon Valley’s competition over artificial intelligence is unfolding. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman accused Meta of offering up to $100 million [https://www.reuters.com/business/sa...t-war-signals-the-start-of-a-new-tech-economy}in compensation to lure his employees. | |
| The eye-catching figure highlights the growing intensity of the AI arms race. Major tech companies scramble to recruit top talent capable of building the next generation of AI tools. | |
| Altman called the offers crazy. He suggested they show how critical AI has become to corporate strategy. Both OpenAI and Meta have invested heavily in artificial intelligence. Meta has recently expanded its AI infrastructure and research teams as it works to catch up to rivals. | |
| While competition between tech giants is nothing new, the size of the reported offers shows how much is riding on AI’s success. Companies wouldn’t spend that kind of money unless they believe the technology will be a central part of business, government, and daily life for years to come. | |
| Why It Matters | |
| The willingness to spend $100 million or more on a single AI expert is about more than building better apps and smarter software. It reveals an admission that AI will shape every major sector of the economy. | |
The technology’s growing reach has also sparked warnings. Pope Leo recently urged world leaders to regulate AI development to avoid unintended consequences. He called it a tool that could both improve society and undermine human rights if left unchecked.
As AI becomes more capable and more deeply embedded in industries, control over its development is becoming a key global issue. The talent war is one part of that larger struggle.
How It Affects Reader
The enormous salaries being offered suggest AI is hardly a passing trend. It’s a technology expected to reshape the economy and labor market in fundamental ways.
Many jobs that rely on repetitive tasks, data analysis, or content creation could be transformed or replaced by AI systems. Companies investing billions in AI are looking to automate processes, cut costs, and increase efficiency. That means some roles may disappear while others evolve, forcing workers to adapt to new technologies or shift into new industries altogether.
At the same time, the AI boom is creating new, high-paying jobs for those with specialized skills. But the growing gap between those able to participate in the AI economy and those at risk of being replaced raises concerns about inequality and workforce disruption.
The fact that companies are willing to spend $100 million to hire AI experts sends a clear message. AI will be a driving force in how businesses operate, how economies grow, and how jobs are defined in the years ahead.
It's a dog-eat-dog world out there ... and we can be sure they continue to sniff around BRN.
Many great posts being put forward, especially from our overseas poster Frangi, does this lady ever sleep
Why no ASX announcements !? well it's very obvious why not.
Antonio has simply had enough of the ASX, their attitude, their nastiness towards our company.
How can we provide genuine answers to material questions relating to potential revenue, when we as a company have absolutely no idea what sort of numbers could be potentially involved regarding IP revenue, chip volume orders, product sales equating to royalty revenues etc, we simply can't, so frustration has boiled over, this is not how things are done in "the USA".
Can I see things changing, absolutely not.
This pattern of newsfeed will be sourced from the current channels, accept it or not,
that's your choice moving forward.
Brainchip continues making forward strides, as frustrating as it is, we have proven, disruptive technology, time will eventually be our friend, trust your instincts.
Tech
Fullmoonfever
Top 20
And @TECH
There are written exceptions, as we know, to continuous disclosure.
Personally I believe there are plenty of non sensitive Anns re collaborations, or partnerships that could be released under these exceptions as a minimum.
Collabs and partnerships are generally not MOUs or LOIs or formal licences etc that may or may not have revenue attached.
Even if they may have future revenue attached they may meet the exceptions under points 2 & 3.
The BS hiding and excuses need to stop and the BOD or Chairman need to get their big boy pants on and do their job properly imo.
AI generated summary:
In general, companies must disclose material information that could affect their share price, including revenue information, under the continuous disclosure rules. However, certain exceptions allow for non-disclosure in specific circumstances. These exceptions generally apply when disclosure would be a breach of law, the information is part of an incomplete negotiation or proposal, the information is speculative or insufficiently definite, it's for internal management purposes, or it's a trade secret.
Elaboration:
The core principle of continuous disclosure requires listed companies to immediately disclose any information that a reasonable person would expect to have a material effect on the price or value of their securities. This includes revenue information, especially if it's likely to differ significantly from previous guidance or expectations.
However, the ASX Listing Rules (specifically Listing Rule 3.1A) provide exceptions to this requirement. These exceptions are designed to protect legitimate commercial interests of the company and its shareholders by allowing non-disclosure under certain conditions.
Key Exceptions to Continuous Disclosure:
- 1. Legally Prohibited Disclosure:
If disclosing information would be a breach of law, such as confidentiality agreements or privacy laws, the company is not required to disclose it immediately.
- 2. Incomplete Proposals or Negotiations:
Information concerning ongoing negotiations or incomplete proposals, such as a potential merger or acquisition, does not need to be disclosed until the proposal is finalized and the parties are committed to proceeding.
- 3. Speculative or Undefined Information:
If the information is based on conjecture, supposition, or is not sufficiently definite to warrant disclosure, it may be withheld. This could apply to early-stage projects or potential revenue streams where the outcome is uncertain.
- 4. Internal Management Purposes:
Information generated for internal management purposes, such as internal budgets or forecasts, is generally exempt from continuous disclosure.
- 5. Trade Secrets:
Information that constitutes a trade secret, meaning it's confidential and gives the company a competitive advantage, is also exempt.
- Materiality:
The key factor in determining whether information needs to be disclosed is its materiality. Information that a reasonable person would expect to influence the share price is considered material and must be disclosed unless an exception applies.
- Confidentiality:
Even if an exception applies, the information must remain confidential. If the information ceases to be confidential, it must be disclosed immediately.
- Reasonable Person Test:
The "reasonable person" test is crucial in determining whether information is material and whether an exception applies.
We had a great conference with the EDGE AI FOUNDATION, validating our approach with Akida2 with TENNs, which we will start rolling out for evaluation in summer 2025. | Alf Kuchenbuch
We had a great conference with the EDGE AI FOUNDATION, validating our approach with Akida2 with TENNs, which we will start rolling out for evaluation in summer 2025.
Fullmoonfever
Top 20
So should be getting rolled out pretty much now if working to a northern "summer".
We had a great conference with the EDGE AI FOUNDATION, validating our approach with Akida2 with TENNs, which we will start rolling out for evaluation in summer 2025. | Alf Kuchenbuch
We had a great conference with the EDGE AI FOUNDATION, validating our approach with Akida2 with TENNs, which we will start rolling out for evaluation in summer 2025.www.linkedin.com
GazDix
Regular
This 'nastiness' you describe Tech is a few years old now.Many great posts being put forward, especially from our overseas poster Frangi, does this lady ever sleep
Why no ASX announcements !? well it's very obvious why not.
Antonio has simply had enough of the ASX, their attitude, their nastiness towards our company.
How can we provide genuine answers to material questions relating to potential revenue, when we as a company have absolutely no idea what sort of numbers could be potentially involved regarding IP revenue, chip volume orders, product sales equating to royalty revenues etc, we simply can't, so frustration has boiled over, this is not how things are done in "the USA".
Can I see things changing, absolutely not.
This pattern of newsfeed will be sourced from the current channels, accept it or not,
that's your choice moving forward.
Brainchip continues making forward strides, as frustrating as it is, we have proven, disruptive technology, time will eventually be our friend, trust your instincts.
Tech
Also, I am sceptical too that the fault lies completely with the ASX.
There is absolutely no excuse why our X
posts about new partners etc. cannot be put up as Non price Ann's on the ASX.
No excuse at all.
I hold and have held various companies and their random non-price Ann's could also be considered 'pumping' far worse than any X post we have put out recently. Antonio said he listens, but the slug doesn't.
The reason why we are a 20 cent company is because of our pathetic management who seems to think Brainchip is their company and not us Shareholders and Peter's etc.
There is better comms, attempts to get market attention and more transparency in some of the dodgiest crypto companies I have dealt with than Brainchip. This just upsets me.
Anyway, I don't blame the ASX. How the hell do we think we can go to High School (Nasdaq) when we can't even graduate from Kindy yet (ASX)?
Bravo
If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its biceps💪!
Hi @TECH ,
I'm afraid I agree with the general consensus - that the excuses from BrainChip’s Board are starting to wear thin. So thin, in fact, they’re practically invisible at this point.
If Weebit can issue non-price-sensitive announcements, why can’t BrainChip? The only logical explanation for me is that the Board fears these partnerships are too fragile to even support a basic market update.
It’s time for some serious reflection.
Has anyone here actually received a response from the new IR team? Because I haven’t seen a single person say they’ve heard anything.
Have we found ourselves in a situation where the new IR team is somehow even less communicative than the old one-person setup?
The time for excuses is over.
Let's not forget that we are the ones who’ve kept the faith. We’ve supported this company through its formative years, weathered the seemingly endless delays, and defended it when it mattered.
We’re not asking for miracles, just a basic level of respect and transparency.
Surely, a good-faith attempt at proper communication is not too much to expect.
After-all Antonio admitted at the AGM that the hesitancy to announce anything was due to his own overly-conservative approach and he gave assurances that something would be done to improve this In future.
You stated "Brainchip continues making forward strides". But how can we trust this is true if so little is being officially reported and communication with shareholders has become virtually nonexistent?
I'm afraid I agree with the general consensus - that the excuses from BrainChip’s Board are starting to wear thin. So thin, in fact, they’re practically invisible at this point.
If Weebit can issue non-price-sensitive announcements, why can’t BrainChip? The only logical explanation for me is that the Board fears these partnerships are too fragile to even support a basic market update.
It’s time for some serious reflection.
Has anyone here actually received a response from the new IR team? Because I haven’t seen a single person say they’ve heard anything.
Have we found ourselves in a situation where the new IR team is somehow even less communicative than the old one-person setup?
The time for excuses is over.
Let's not forget that we are the ones who’ve kept the faith. We’ve supported this company through its formative years, weathered the seemingly endless delays, and defended it when it mattered.
We’re not asking for miracles, just a basic level of respect and transparency.
Surely, a good-faith attempt at proper communication is not too much to expect.
After-all Antonio admitted at the AGM that the hesitancy to announce anything was due to his own overly-conservative approach and he gave assurances that something would be done to improve this In future.
You stated "Brainchip continues making forward strides". But how can we trust this is true if so little is being officially reported and communication with shareholders has become virtually nonexistent?
Last edited:
Many great posts being put forward, especially from our overseas poster Frangi, does this lady ever sleep
Why no ASX announcements !? well it's very obvious why not.
Antonio has simply had enough of the ASX, their attitude, their nastiness towards our company.
How can we provide genuine answers to material questions relating to potential revenue, when we as a company have absolutely no idea what sort of numbers could be potentially involved regarding IP revenue, chip volume orders, product sales equating to royalty revenues etc, we simply can't, so frustration has boiled over, this is not how things are done in "the USA".
Can I see things changing, absolutely not.
This pattern of newsfeed will be sourced from the current channels, accept it or not,
that's your choice moving forward.
Brainchip continues making forward strides, as frustrating as it is, we have proven, disruptive technology, time will eventually be our friend, trust your instincts.
Tech
"Antonio has simply had enough of the ASX, their attitude, their nastiness towards our company."
One enormous problem with your comments, this is not a private company that belongs to Antonio, this is a publicly listed company, it belongs to ALL shareholders. He doesn't get to decide...
This is clearly your opinion only and not Antonio's, as we can all see from Sean and Antonio's comments at the AGM this year..
Firstly from Sean at the AGM..., As we look into 25, our focus is laser sharp on 4 critical objectives, Objective Three, improve our investor relations to give stakeholders clear, transparent and top tier communication that reflect our commitment to shareholder engagement.
And from Antonio at the AGM - If we do a deal with customer A, right, trust me, Brainchip has no problem at all, right, trying to get information out, whether it be to the ASX or to the general market that we did business with Customer A, we absolutely want to do that. It, it promotes our brand, it shows the market that more people are utilizing our technology. It makes shareholders happy.
We have a relationship with the ASX. We've talked to the ASX. We have made it clear to the ASX how we do business. Right. And we will absolutely, when something we deem is truly material to the shareholders, we will absolutely put it on ASX. We understand that obligation.
And it is an active discussion at the board in terms of how we can fulfill non price sensitive announcements. That message has been heard. Look, I'll fall on the sword, right? Given the history of the company, I have swung whoops, apologies, I have swung the pendulum the other way in terms of being conservative, right? I don't want to get the company into trouble. I'm being too conservative.
I'll take the heat. Please shoot all arrows at me. Not my fellow board members, not Sean, that is Antonio. I'm too conservative, right?
I'm gonna fix that. I will fix that.
---------------------------------------------
It's amazing that any shareholder would try and excuse or justify Antonio's (and the company's) behaviour that is hurting the company and the share price.
Last edited:
MDhere
Top 20
I have a feeling we are not far away from some big news, (on asx) and my guess is that it will be about either drones with Arquimea and Prophesee or with Tata. Then again maybe with a flood of others companies with other products. Feeling very positive about the drone market for Brainchip.
This was from an article back in April but it re-enforces my recent posting regarding drones with Brainchip capability.
Have a great weekend fellow brainers.
MD
BrainChip gives the edge to search and rescue operations
This was from an article back in April but it re-enforces my recent posting regarding drones with Brainchip capability.
Have a great weekend fellow brainers.
MD
There is nothing wrong with the management, IMO.
Okay, Antonio's remarks about moving were unfortunate to put it mildly, not a fan of him at all.
Anyway, he is not running the show, Sean is, and he is slowly lining the ducks up in a row for deeper marker penetration IMO.
Edge AI is just starting now, and the big players are still kicking the tires, testing, evaluating which technology to use and on where to use it.
They are planning years ahead, and they want to make sure they are on the right track before committing.
Smaller players are way more flexible, hey BRN can we buy Akida1000, let's say 500 for starters for our drones?
Space, aerospace and military based companies wants the best they can get, no money spared, and we have a foot in the door already.
The Technology Roadmap was presented during the AGM and shows how the company is maturing, something big companies wants to see.
Okay, they mean business, let's check them out.
The university program is also an excellent way of spreading the word about the technology, new graduates moving onto the industry and can help implement Akida from their experiences experimenting with same.
From what I see, I think we will eventually get there, a step closer each day.
I hope we can stop mentioning the bears and swing traders over on the toilet, you are just giving them free press by doing so.
I have them all on ignore and don't read their toilet posts. A few excellent posters on there and I read their posts off course.
Just an example...
For all the arguments and reasons that BrainChip throw out about why they can't make ASX announcements, they should take a leaf out of Droneshield's book. No naming of their customer..
I'd encourage every shareholder to read, to see how other ASX companies make ASX announcements without naming client names.
For all the arguments and reasons that BrainChip throw out about why they can't make ASX announcements, they should take a leaf out of Droneshield's book. No naming of their customer..
I'd encourage every shareholder to read, to see how other ASX companies make ASX announcements without naming client names.
Fullmoonfever
Top 20
The problem is this statement:
"Right. And we will absolutely, when something we deem is truly material to the shareholders, we will absolutely put it on ASX. We understand that obligation."
Of course he understands the obligation to Ann on market anything deemed material but it's the "we" but that is annoying.
The ASX guidance outlines what could be deemed material and it revolves around "a reasonable person" as I posted previously.
Personally I would consider most SHs to be "reasonable people" and as such if they all seem to believe there could be an influence on the SP by even non sensitive Anns then Antonio should be doing it...not the attitude of "we" (meaning him apparently as he makes the decision to Ann or not) deciding.
Important Considerations:
- Materiality:
The key factor in determining whether information needs to be disclosed is its materiality. Information that a reasonable person would expect to influence the share price is considered material and must be disclosed unless an exception applies.
- Reasonable Person Test:
The "reasonable person" test is crucial in determining whether information is material and whether an exception applies.
Fullmoonfever
Top 20
Geez....there's that "reasonable person" rationale haha. Maybe AV should read some of those Anns to get feel as to how it's done.
Getupthere
Regular
It’s clear that management hasn’t fully utilised the ASX for price-sensitive and non-sensitive announcements. One reason for this is that the lower the price, the more shares they can get.
They are not aligned with shareholders.
They are not aligned with shareholders.
Similar threads
