Before anyone thinks of doing something like this, please speak to an accountant and familiarize yourself with the concept of a wash sale.
...and related-party transactions, which are red flags to the ATO, particularly in a SMSF.
Before anyone thinks of doing something like this, please speak to an accountant and familiarize yourself with the concept of a wash sale.
My expectation is that the ATO will be ok so long as the sale of your non-super AVZ shares to your SMSF is done at a transaction value that is prepared by an ATO approved valuation company. I have obtained a quote for the valuation fee, which is $5,500, plus I have submitted a formal query to the ATO via the Business Portal secure mail process, and at present I am waiting for the ATO reponse. The ATO has indicated that their response will be available by 25-Apr-2025, but perhaps they may take longer. If the ATO approves my proposal, I will proceed with the formal valuation of AVZ and complete the transfer of my non-Super AVZ shares to my SMSF before Kobold and RIO, for example, buy AVZ....and related-party transactions, which are red flags to the ATO, particularly in a SMSF.
Correct.... can't be done from related entity while de-listed. Potentially can purchase with SMSF from a non-related entity...and related-party transactions, which are red flags to the ATO, particularly in a SMSF.
My expectation is that the ATO will be ok so long as the sale of your non-super AVZ shares to your SMSF is done at a transaction value that is prepared by an ATO approved valuation company. I have obtained a quote for the valuation fee, which is $5,500, plus I have submitted a formal query to the ATO via the Business Portal secure mail process, and at present I am waiting for the ATO reponse. The ATO has indicated that their response will be available by 25-Apr-2025, but perhaps they may take longer. If the ATO approves my proposal, I will proceed with the formal valuation of AVZ and complete the transfer of my non-Super AVZ shares to my SMSF before Kobold and RIO, for example, buy AVZ.
They'll be going against their own instructions....it is no longer listed...My expectation is that the ATO will be ok so long as the sale of your non-super AVZ shares to your SMSF is done at a transaction value that is prepared by an ATO approved valuation company. I have obtained a quote for the valuation fee, which is $5,500, plus I have submitted a formal query to the ATO via the Business Portal secure mail process, and at present I am waiting for the ATO reponse. The ATO has indicated that their response will be available by 25-Apr-2025, but perhaps they may take longer. If the ATO approves my proposal, I will proceed with the formal valuation of AVZ and complete the transfer of my non-Super AVZ shares to my SMSF before Kobold and RIO, for example, buy AVZ.
Correct.... can't be done from related entity while de-listed. Potentially can purchase with SMSF from a non-related entity.... could be interested in a win-win arrangement if someone else looking to get some holdings across into their SMSF.
Before I get torched for coming out of the woodwork... I'm just an introverted long time holder that's been lurking in the shadows suffering the same mental/financial strain as everyone else through this fkd up drama. Recent development give a glimmer of hope, however I have no doubt given the mud thrown to date, our enemies are working overtime to screw us further.
To be fair... ato are bloody useless... even when their data is incredibly specific and pointed...Maybe, but the ATO's data matching algorithms may flag cross-holding transactions undergone with the purpose of avoiding tax.
If the ATO decides to disallow a transaction, the trustee is in a world of pain.
But there's no tax avoidance going on.... in fact it may even trigger a CGT event for each selling entity depending on the $.Maybe, but the ATO's data matching algorithms may flag cross-holding transactions undergone with the purpose of avoiding tax.
If the ATO decides to disallow a transaction, the trustee is in a world of pain.
But there's no tax avoidance going on.... in fact it may even trigger a CGT event for each selling entity depending on the $.
You sound like my AccountantOh, I hope I didn't misunderstand your comment.
If you are thinking of a one-way transaction in order for your SMSF to simply acquire the asset at market value from an unrelated party...good to go.
However, if it's a two-way transaction (below) then the ATO may smite thee, depending on its view on the purpose of the transactions:
Cheers
- an individual sells an asset (unlisted AVZ shares) to an unrelated party, and
- the unrelated party back-sells the same assets (unlisted AVZ shares) to the original person's SMSF...then the ATO may see this as a contrived scheme to avoid tax, regardless of whether some CGT is collected in the process.
F
Well that’s the decision for Kobild or whoever wants it. Offer a decent amount now and assume some risk or risk AVZ doing very well at ICSID and being awarded 10+B and setting the floor price. Once ICSID begins AVZ should see it throughIf the US want us to drop legal proceedings in order to get a deal done , does this mean a deal needs to be secured/guaranteed prior to the commencement of the ICSID case in early June , or does this also mean we can start proceedings then pull the case prior to final verdict once a deal is satisfactory ?
Please explain how capital buyback enables cgt discount? If they have the cash, let's just say $5bn, that will have already been due to a taxable transaction... in which case anything above the $226m of issued capital would need to come back as dividend wouldnit not? A share bauback will still leave all the retained profits...So much bad and incorrect tax advice—on an offer that hasn’t even been made yet!
Assuming an offer is made, and we as shareholders actually accept it (I’m still highly skeptical we won’t be screwed over yet again), the most likely outcome is a share buyback to allow shareholders to realise their capital gains discount.
Surely they could at least try for a share sale vote and have a contingency back up ready to go if the maggots manage to vote it down.Please explain how capital buyback enables cgt discount? If they have the cash, let's just say $5bn, that will have already been due to a taxable transaction... in which case anything above the $226m of issued capital would need to come back as dividend wouldnit not? A share bauback will still leave all the retained profits...
Yes a share buy back would enable crystallising of losses also, but, not cgt discount...
Avz would have to do a deal where shareholders shares are either purchased or taken script for script to enable any cgt relief... (other than crystallising losses).
I long for a cgt event, but, feel it is unlikely... avz won't want to give Chinese or mmga maggots a vote on share sale or project sale... therefore I think it will need to be structured some other way... likewise, due to catl, don't think we'll receive the ML deliberately... both make be feel a taxable event wil be the result... not a cgt event for shareholders.... of course I could be wrong... just my opinion and gut feel
Hope soSurely they could at least try for a share sale vote and have a contingency back up ready to go if the maggots manage to vote it down.