BRN Discussion Ongoing

[charles2]

Agree Slade. Can't move to a US exchange with the stock price languishing. Need a clear upward trajectory based upon recognition of technical excellence and $$$ producing contracts demonstrating an irrefutably bright future.

If not we get slaughtered by short sellers. Slaughtered!

Made even worse as few know of us in the US.

We MUST produce some fanfare before departing Australia. Or be prepared to fall on our sword.

 

[Pom down under]

https://himalayas.app/companies/autonomous-teaming-solutions/jobs/neuromorphic-computing-engineer-ultra-low-power-real-time-ml-for-sensors-m-w

Neuromorphic Computing Engineer – Ultra-Low-Power Real-Time ML for Sensors (m/w/​

Sign up to save this job
Autonomous Teaming Solutions ATS GmbH focuses on developing technology-based solutions to protect freedom against asymmetric threats.

Autonomous Teaming Solutions

FR, DE + 1 more
Apply now
Tailor my resumeWrite my cover letterGenerate mock interview

Your mission​

• Research and develop neuromorphic computing architectures for ultra-low-power, real-time ML processing on UAV and sensor systems
• Design and optimize spiking neural networks (SNNs) for edge AI inference on neuromorphic chips (Loihi, BrainChip Akida, SpiNNaker)
• Implement event-driven processing to enhance energy efficiency in autonomous UAV perception and decision-making
• Develop bio-inspired AI models to improve UAV swarm intelligence, real-time object recognition, and anomaly detection
• Collaborate with sensor fusion, embedded AI, and robotics teams to integrate neuromorphic computing into UAV defense applications
• Ensure resilience to adversarial AI attacks and develop robust ML architectures for contested environments
• Work with AI hardware accelerators (FPGA, ASIC, Edge TPU) for real-time ML execution

Your profile​

• 5+ years experience in neuromorphic computing, edge AI, or ultra-low-power ML systems
• Strong expertise in spiking neural networks (SNNs), temporal coding, and bio-inspired AI architectures
• Proficiency in Python, C++, or Rust for neuromorphic model development and optimization
• Experience with neuromorphic hardware platforms (Intel Loihi, BrainChip, IBM TrueNorth, SpiNNaker)
• Deep understanding of event-based processing, low-power computing, and real-time AI inference
• Familiarity with AI security, adversarial robustness, and ML resilience in electronic warfare environments

Nice to have

• Experience with hybrid classical-neuromorphic AI models for UAV autonomy
• Background in biologically inspired robotics and adaptive learning systems
• Knowledge of quantum-classical AI integration for next-gen UAV intelligence

autonomous teaming | defence against ai-powered, asymmetric threats at scale

Developing scalable, decentralised, mobile, nimble and low-cost solutions to defend against asymmetric ai-powered threats at scale on land, in the air and at sea.

www.autonomous-teaming.ai

 

[Pom down under]

Akida BrainChip Applications in AI | Restackio

Explore the innovative applications of Akida BrainChip in AI, focusing on neuromorphic hardware and its impact on technology. | Restackio

www.restack.io

This Ant-Inspired AI Brain Helps Farm Robots Better Navigate Crops

Thanks to sophisticated AI that allows robots to “see” their surroundings, they are rapidly integrating into our food production mainline.

singularityhub.com

 

[IloveLamp]

RePioneering the Future | EventX

Welcome to 2025 Andes RISC-V CON Silicon Valley – a premier event bringing together industry leaders and developers.

eventxapp.com

Andes Technology Corporation on LinkedIn: Come to the DoubleTree in San Jose, CA on April 29th to see Chief…

Come to the DoubleTree in San Jose, CA on April 29th to see Chief Marketing Officer from Brainchip, Steve Brightfield, give a speech at our 2025 RISC-V Con on…

www.linkedin.com

 

[Papacass]

I’ve been a supporter and part owner of Brainchip for about 8 years now, all through the soul sapping lows and rare euphoric ups. I believe in the tech but I’m starting to detect a stench. I’m starting to think that Hehir and Vianna are weasels. They resent being listed on and accountable to the ASX and they resent being accountable to Australian shareholders. I suspect they hate coming to Australia and fronting up at the AGM and being questioned by Australians. ‘The share price will do what the share price will do’ is bullshit and just shows true contempt to thousands of shareholders who have put in their hard earned. BRN knew that the redomiciling announcement would hurt the share price, it was marked price sensitive, and they know that thousands of Australian shareholders hold their shares in Australian super funds because they have full access to the register. I, for one, don’t think that there is any huge revenue making deal around the corner contingent on a US listing. Australia is in AUKUS, we’re a trusted ally right? Surely Australia can help build the iron dome and protect US defence computer infrastructure the same as we can buy second hand nuclear subs and 4th or 5th gen fighters from the US. I think BRN wants to largely divest itself of Australian shareholders and become a fully US company. The question I have is can Aussie shareholders hang on and maybe reap some rewards from the promised land? My opinion is that the redomiciling is going to happen, what happens to us is the question. I’d love to know what PVDM thinks. As a proud Australian and founder surely he doesn’t want us shafted. Sorry for the rant, just feeling a bit shitty with BRN at the moment.

 

[sleepymonk]

Apart from the move being a good or bad idea, I am hoping that the whole thing was well discussed and thought through the board meeting/s.
1: regulations, requirements etc for the listing and delisting
2: biggest hurdle the Board will face is the VOTE, it takes only 25% to shut it off.

Having said that, the management has only a few months to present something decent to appeal the votes from us retail holders, who hold 59+% of BRN. TBH, my vote and my mates' votes will be absolutely no if nothing turns up but verbal confidence. To me, that is insanity combined with stupidity.

How comfortable do I feel there is a good plan in the pipeline to convince us?

Common sense tells me that must be the case since no board member is stupid even some here call them incompetent. They can surely think through the things we could think through. On top of this, Peter our funder's endorsement to this move gives me more comfortability unless he starts selling in the next few months.

But, a big fat but, I hate to say this though, I feel nervous and anxious coz this Sean has a track record of decision making without common sense, I 'll throw in a few:
1: Sean said in last AGM that no CR in the foreseeable future 2 months before the 19.3c CR, he was either lying or the CR was a swift decision. Guess what, money raised and sat in the bank suffering exchange rate paper loss. And this Sean even dares to say that we don't hedge, which made me believe all the years I have been hedging to minimise my exposure to currency fluctuation are wasted. (I am in the building industry and buy overseas material all the time, we pay a bit premium to lock in the rate so we know where our margin is)
2: LDA was paid to leave July last year, guess what, they are back on board with warm hugs 5 months after. I am seriously disgusted to make any sense out it. Isn't paying them and keep an amendment in place better that the current dealing?

enough venting, but still in the hope that common sense prevails.

 

[Pom down under]

Thoughts anyone.
We still working with Microchip.

Don’t know but they are showcasing a few things at the embedded world which brainchip is at next week

1.8K views · 29 reactions | 🚀 Experience Innovation in Action at Embedded World 2025 🚀 Join us in Nuremberg as we showcase cutting-edge embedded solutions revolutionizing the... | By Microchip Technology Inc. | Facebook

🚀 Experience Innovation in Action at Embedded World 2025 🚀 Join us in Nuremberg as we showcase cutting-edge embedded solutions revolutionizing the...

www.facebook.com

 

[TECH]

I’ve been a supporter and part owner of Brainchip for about 8 years now, all through the soul sapping lows and rare euphoric ups. I believe in the tech but I’m starting to detect a stench. I’m starting to think that Hehir and Vianna are weasels. They resent being listed on and accountable to the ASX and they resent being accountable to Australian shareholders. I suspect they hate coming to Australia and fronting up at the AGM and being questioned by Australians. ‘The share price will do what the share price will do’ is bullshit and just shows true contempt to thousands of shareholders who have put in their hard earned. BRN knew that the redomiciling announcement would hurt the share price, it was marked price sensitive, and they know that thousands of Australian shareholders hold their shares in Australian super funds because they have full access to the register. I, for one, don’t think that there is any huge revenue making deal around the corner contingent on a US listing. Australia is in AUKUS, we’re a trusted ally right? Surely Australia can help build the iron dome and protect US defence computer infrastructure the same as we can buy second hand nuclear subs and 4th or 5th gen fighters from the US. I think BRN wants to largely divest itself of Australian shareholders and become a fully US company. The question I have is can Aussie shareholders hang on and maybe reap some rewards from the promised land? My opinion is that the redomiciling is going to happen, what happens to us is the question. I’d love to know what PVDM thinks. As a proud Australian and founder surely he doesn’t want us shafted. Sorry for the rant, just feeling a bit shitty with BRN at the moment.

I'll try to get a response from Peter when I give him a call, he knows all about the loyalty and has met many Australian shareholders, with 3
NED's on the Board from Australia, nothing should ever be taken for granted, my personal attitude is that, we are still making forward steps, yes it's bloody frustrating seeing our share price so damn low, are we undervalued ?? it's hard to say when we see the quarterly revenue, it's depressing, lets be honest...BUT, why are big corporations still engaged with us ? because we have something that's definitely disruptive.

I agree with many of the regular posters, and my opinion really is, the company has to reveal exactly why this moving to the US at this stage
is so important, I want them to be upfront and truly sell me the idea WHY, NOT JUST BECAUSE THEY SAY SO.....many in Australia on this stock
are really hurting, yet we have a brilliant technology, don't you all agree ?

What we really need is AKD II and TENN's to infiltrate the ASX and counter the BOTS once and for all, the trading pattern and individual lines
make me sick......corruption at its finest..........ASIC make me sick as well.......absolutely gutless !!!!

Rant and moan completed..........Tech (stay strong BRN lovers)

 

[Pom down under]

Old video but not posted I don’t think

 

[Pom down under]

Bored waiting for Alfred here’s another video

 

[IloveLamp]

Tata Electronics, Himax and PSMC Form Alliance to Revolutionize India’s Display and Ultralow Power AI Sensing Product and Technology Ecosystem

Tata Electronics, Himax and PSMC Form Alliance to Revolutionize India’s Display and Ultralow Power AI Sensing Product and Technology Ecosystem

Himax Technologies, Inc. announced on March 5, 2025, a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Tata Electronics, a pioneering leader in India’s electronics manufacturing sector, and Powerchip Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation (PSMC), a leading Taiwanese Foundry and Technology Transfer Partner o

www.linkedin.com

 

[Pom down under]

Not sure if anything of any importance in this video

 

[manny100]

The neuromorphic receivers referred to in the video posted by Arm on the occasion of Mobile World Congress Barcelona 2025 were actually developed by VIAVI Marconi Labs in Stevenage, UK (https://blog.viavisolutions.com/202...-powered-by-127-years-of-wireless-innovation/):

MWC Barcelona 2025: VIAVI Collaborations Showcase Importance of Ecosystem… | Stephen Wang

🌟 VIAVI 6G Testbed, Raytracing Digital Twin Testbed, and AI Testing AI Solutions from VIAVI Marconi Labs in MWC25! 🌟 Time: 3-6 March, Location: VIAVI Hall 5 Stand 5A18 📚 Booking an on-site meeting with us https://lnkd.in/eJ9HhYrX 🎥 VIAVI 6G Forward Demo Video: https://lnkd.in/e94kF9DS 📚...

www.linkedin.com

View attachment 78695

Evolution of 6G Communications - VIAVI Perspectives

VIAVI enables the development, advancement and implementation of 6G. Its 6G Forward program helps to take 6G from research to reality.

blog.viavisolutions.com

View attachment 78698


And by the way, it wasn’t Ericsson that mentioned us alongside Loihi in any of their patents. Accenture and Tata Consultancy Services did.

I am not aware of any advances with the Accenture and Tata connection. Maybe NDA's??

 

[rgupta]

Our game is improving Rgupta, albeit slowly..

I know what the plan "was" but we need to change tack and adjust to the rapidly changing World conditions.
We don't have the luxury, to wait until the "ideal" conditions, as it will now put us at a greater disadvantage commercially.

I do believe we will have had more traction, by the end of the year though and will hit the ground running, in the US.

Right now the share price doesn't concern or bother me, other than it's not good for the LDA Capital call.

Like I said, as long as the scheme of arrangement is favourable, I'm happy and we will have to wait and see, what they propose.

DB it is not me but the after effects are telling us it is a devastating announcement from the company. It hurts a lot of long term share holders like me. In investing patience is considered as the key but the present management had cleared all the boundaries.
To start with
1. For last 18 months ( even more we are continuously selling on market. If the technology is that revolutionary and board is that revolutionary then why cannot we find a single investor who can invest in company and take a substantial position.
2. We did a credit raise last year in Nov and as per Sean's own wording the money was still in Australia and they did not use it. So what was the urgency for management to make another deal with LDA and make a minimum draw down of 20 million before June 25.
3. If they want to move to US then why they are punishing us by selling another $20 million of shares on market on asx. If they have a plan then they should try to find some institutional investor or a tech company in US who can invest in brainchip and that would had been more understanle statement that there is a demand in US. But rather company keep on making parachutes in asx and now want to make new ones in US while everyone on a parachute on asx is crying hard and waiting for an accident.
4. We had akida 1000 for more than 4 years now, two customers before Sean joined in but we were not good enough to atleast as much revenue from that whatsoever we spend on that but we 1st commercial producer of neurophonic. A commercialization which cannot generate enough revenue to cover expenses leave alone a profit here.
So I keep can keep going here and now a bolt from the blue, we are thinking redomicile, but quality you have
We have a new technology which we were trying to commercialize, in between we make too many parachutes and holders enjoyed that as well. But now we cannot make anymore parachutes as they start asking when these parachutes will deliver revenue and we run to sell them to US.
Dyor

 

[manny100]

I'll try to get a response from Peter when I give him a call, he knows all about the loyalty and has met many Australian shareholders, with 3
NED's on the Board from Australia, nothing should ever be taken for granted, my personal attitude is that, we are still making forward steps, yes it's bloody frustrating seeing our share price so damn low, are we undervalued ?? it's hard to say when we see the quarterly revenue, it's depressing, lets be honest...BUT, why are big corporations still engaged with us ? because we have something that's definitely disruptive.

I agree with many of the regular posters, and my opinion really is, the company has to reveal exactly why this moving to the US at this stage
is so important, I want them to be upfront and truly sell me the idea WHY, NOT JUST BECAUSE THEY SAY SO.....many in Australia on this stock
are really hurting, yet we have a brilliant technology, don't you all agree ?

What we really need is AKD II and TENN's to infiltrate the ASX and counter the BOTS once and for all, the trading pattern and individual lines
make me sick......corruption at its finest..........ASIC make me sick as well.......absolutely gutless !!!!

Rant and moan completed..........Tech (stay strong BRN lovers)

The BOD would be only to aware that the possible move to the US would be frightening to a lot of holders. Most people do not like intended change, especially in the early stages. It takes time to sink in and be digested.
There is no way the BOD will go into a meeting where 75% of votes present and by proxy are required to pass a delist motion without being very, very confident it will pass.
To be confident it will pass they will need to provide some positive client engagements news as well as Tech advancement news.
More Onsor type arrangements would be great. A Tata deal. More news on the US defense front would be handy. Perhaps some positive advancements with our cybersecurity partners QV/Lockheed-Martin.
I suspect our US defense connections have made it clear from a security point of view they would prefer us to be listed in the US.

 

[Meatloaf]

The BOD would be only to aware that the possible move to the US would be frightening to a lot of holders. Most people do not like intended change, especially in the early stages. It takes time to sink in and be digested.
There is no way the BOD will go into a meeting where 75% of votes present and by proxy are required to pass a delist motion without being very, very confident it will pass.
To be confident it will pass they will need to provide some positive client engagements news as well as Tech advancement news.
More Onsor type arrangements would be great. A Tata deal. More news on the US defense front would be handy. Perhaps some positive advancements with our cybersecurity partners QV/Lockheed-Martin.
I suspect our US defense connections have made it clear from a security point of view they would prefer us to be listed in the US.

Everything you’ve stated is speculation. In the past it has been assumed that positive news is just around the corner and we’re still waiting.

I am a definite NO until I am convinced otherwise. My decision will be based of facts not speculation.

I’m hoping you’re right but management so far have left me with doubt.

 

[jrp173]

I’ve been a supporter and part owner of Brainchip for about 8 years now, all through the soul sapping lows and rare euphoric ups. I believe in the tech but I’m starting to detect a stench. I’m starting to think that Hehir and Vianna are weasels. They resent being listed on and accountable to the ASX and they resent being accountable to Australian shareholders. I suspect they hate coming to Australia and fronting up at the AGM and being questioned by Australians. ‘The share price will do what the share price will do’ is bullshit and just shows true contempt to thousands of shareholders who have put in their hard earned. BRN knew that the redomiciling announcement would hurt the share price, it was marked price sensitive, and they know that thousands of Australian shareholders hold their shares in Australian super funds because they have full access to the register. I, for one, don’t think that there is any huge revenue making deal around the corner contingent on a US listing. Australia is in AUKUS, we’re a trusted ally right? Surely Australia can help build the iron dome and protect US defence computer infrastructure the same as we can buy second hand nuclear subs and 4th or 5th gen fighters from the US. I think BRN wants to largely divest itself of Australian shareholders and become a fully US company. The question I have is can Aussie shareholders hang on and maybe reap some rewards from the promised land? My opinion is that the redomiciling is going to happen, what happens to us is the question. I’d love to know what PVDM thinks. As a proud Australian and founder surely he doesn’t want us shafted. Sorry for the rant, just feeling a bit shitty with BRN at the moment.

I feel you Papacass. I've been holder for over 9 years, and I am finding it enormously difficult to maintain positivity.

I want to believe in the technology, but how long does it take to get a "significant" deal over the line, not the small deals that we've seen recently. We've been promised so much over the years, but it has just never eventuated. Year after year, and podcast after podcast we are told this is the year, deals around the corner, hockey stick growth, explosive sales etc. I've actually spend some time going through past AGMs, podcasts and news etc, and Brainchip have simply not delivered on what they've said.

I've held my investment because I trusted the company and I've believed what they've told me (shareholders). I'm seriously beginning to wonder if any of it is true... My faith and confidence in management is almost zero!

And now to suggest a US listing, when they have not displayed any "real" success in Australia. To have four or five asx announcements in a day and just slip this one in, I can't help but think that management do not care one iota about Australian shareholders or the share price. Management have a lot of work to do, before they'll be able to convince shareholders to vote for this.

My other issue, is our list of partners. What does all of this mean? We have Mercedes, ARM, Intel etc etc. But no-one really knows what "partner" means. Does it mean we are working towards an IP licence or deal, or is it simply a single employee in a dark room playing with an Akida chip? Or it is someone like Mercedes who have used Akida in their EQXX model, but now it's radio since (so we don't know if EQXX was the end or beginning of our relationship with Mercedes). Will any of these partners actually lead to significant revenue/IP licence? It's like a black hole....I've emailed TD and ask him directly what "partnerships means" but just got back an email full of gibberish, goes around in circles and each sentence contracts the one before.

Im really hoping for some positive news before the AGM, but I've said this every year for years, so not holding my breath.

And for those that say oh well sell, selling is not the answer. The answer is management actually doing their jobs!

 

[Meatloaf]

I feel you Papacass. I've been holder for over 9 years, and I am finding it enormously difficult to maintain positivity.

I want to believe in the technology, but how long does it take to get a "significant" deal over the line, not the small deals that we've seen recently. We've been promised so much over the years, but it has just never eventuated. Year after year, and podcast after podcast we are told this is the year, deals around the corner, hockey stick growth, explosive sales etc. I've actually spend some time going through past AGMs, podcasts and news etc, and Brainchip have simply not delivered on what they've said.

I've held my investment because I trusted the company and I've believed what they've told me (shareholders). I'm seriously beginning to wonder if any of it is true... My faith and confidence in management is almost zero!

And now to suggest a US listing, when they have not displayed any "real" success in Australia. To have four or five asx announcements in a day and just slip this one in, I can't help but think that management do not care one iota about Australian shareholders or the share price. Management have a lot of work to do, before they'll be able to convince shareholders to vote for this.

My other issue, is our list of partners. What does all of this mean? We have Mercedes, ARM, Intel etc etc. But no-one really knows what "partner" means. Does it mean we are working towards an IP licence or deal, or is it simply a single employee in a dark room playing with an Akida chip? Or it is someone like Mercedes who have used Akida in their EQXX model, but now it's radio since (so we don't know if EQXX was the end or beginning of our relationship with Mercedes). Will any of these partners actually lead to significant revenue/IP licence? It's like a black hole....I've emailed TD and ask him directly what "partnerships means" but just got back an email full of gibberish, goes around in circles and each sentence contracts the one before.

Im really hoping for some positive news before the AGM, but I've said this every year for years, so not holding my breath.

And for those that say oh well sell, selling is not the answer. The answer is management actually doing their jobs!

Couldn’t have said it better myself. I think the SH now are finally waking up and questioning what is going on.
I, for one, am sick of speculation. It has done nothing but detract us from asking the hard questions and realising that we were living in La La land.
No wonder the shorters on crapper have been so confident and cocky. Yes, I know the are A holes but they enjoyed more success then what us loyal holders have.
I’m kicking myself that I didn’t have the common sense to sell when the SP reached $2.30. I could have made a decent profit but I listened to the hype and speculation.

Anyway, I learnt a big lesson from that experience. Don’t allow management to pull the wool over your eyes, they need to be held accountable.

 

[DingoBorat]

DB it is not me but the after effects are telling us it is a devastating announcement from the company. It hurts a lot of long term share holders like me. In investing patience is considered as the key but the present management had cleared all the boundaries.
To start with
1. For last 18 months ( even more we are continuously selling on market. If the technology is that revolutionary and board is that revolutionary then why cannot we find a single investor who can invest in company and take a substantial position.
2. We did a credit raise last year in Nov and as per Sean's own wording the money was still in Australia and they did not use it. So what was the urgency for management to make another deal with LDA and make a minimum draw down of 20 million before June 25.
3. If they want to move to US then why they are punishing us by selling another $20 million of shares on market on asx. If they have a plan then they should try to find some institutional investor or a tech company in US who can invest in brainchip and that would had been more understanle statement that there is a demand in US. But rather company keep on making parachutes in asx and now want to make new ones in US while everyone on a parachute on asx is crying hard and waiting for an accident.
4. We had akida 1000 for more than 4 years now, two customers before Sean joined in but we were not good enough to atleast as much revenue from that whatsoever we spend on that but we 1st commercial producer of neurophonic. A commercialization which cannot generate enough revenue to cover expenses leave alone a profit here.
So I keep can keep going here and now a bolt from the blue, we are thinking redomicile, but quality you have
We have a new technology which we were trying to commercialize, in between we make too many parachutes and holders enjoyed that as well. But now we cannot make anymore parachutes as they start asking when these parachutes will deliver revenue and we run to sell them to US.
Dyor

I hear you Rgupta and understand what you are saying, as well as your concerns.

The 4th amendment of the LDA Capital arrangement, came out on the 7th of January and was designed to provide access to capital when necessary, through to June 2026.

That was obviously thrown together pretty quickly, as our obligation with LDA expired on the 31st of December 2024 and we had already bought back the remaining shares prior to that.

The plan to redomicile to the US, at an earlier stage of the Company than anticipated, would have come "after" the above arrangements and plans were in place.

Basically, you could consider it as another misstep by the Company, but the new direction has been one necessitated, by the rapidly changing environment, in the US inparticular, which they did not foresee the implications of.

It's a necessary change of tack, that the Company has had to make and it's actually a good thing, that we are still "small" enough, to change direction when needed.


There does need to be some solid progress heading into the proposed listing, as yes we would likely crash and burn, if we entered as presently.

 

[Smoothsailing]

Qualcomm