SERA2g
Founding Member
Are you quoting FF or signing off as him? I am confused. Lol
BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
Food4 thought
Regular
That’s a great find FMF
It appears that the word is out in the DOD
Open the flood gates and let them in, as long as the don’t squash it for everyone else.
Might be some interesting contracts from the Department of Defence
Let’s hope so
And this weeks going to be a cracker.
Enjoy your week,
Will it be the last week for the $0.30
Smoothsailing
Regular
Cut paste you familiar with it
Bravo
If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its biceps💪!
This article was posted online 11 hours ago .
I believe BrainChip is at the intersection of AI and space technology at exactly the right point in time. Especially if satellites are equipped with neuromorphic vision sensors and neuromorphic processors (ie. AKIDA) for real-time detection, tracking, and interception of the proposed US Iron Dome defense system.
As rocket scientist Ari Sacher states ""If you can solve that problem in outer space, then you can use it on the ground for a whole bunch of other control problems; controlling fires, controlling electric grids, controlling everything… That's the secret: control."
If you click onto the article linked below, you can check out the video with Ari Sachar's interview. At 3.21 mins in he says "I worked together with Raytheon. I was actually the manager of Raytheon from our company in a project called David's Sling. And Raytheon did a whole bunch of meaningful stuff. They designed the computer. They designed a whole bunch of other stuff. They have a tremendous cadre of scientists there. That was about 10 years ago. I don't beleive anything has changed. The Unites States has some amazing scientists and if the government decides to fund this to how much is necessary, then you guys are going to blow everything out of the water. I have absolutely no suspicion otherwise."
His company is Rafael Advanced Defense Systems which I posted about previously. Raytheon and Rafael Advanced Defense Systems have collaborated on multiple defense projects, particularly in missile and air defense systems.
Published February 16, 2025 7:00am EST
By Agustin Hays FOXBusiness
President Donald Trump is seeking to bolster the defense of the American homeland with a U.S.-style Iron Dome missile system. However, one expert believes that a system similar to Israel's is "not needed."
"So let me tell you at the outset, the president is using the term ‘Iron Dome’ as a metaphor," rocket scientist Ari Sacher said during an interview on FOX Business' "Mornings with Maria" Monday. "It's perfect for defending Israel from Gaza, Lebanon, it is not something that the United States needs very much."
In President Trump's first few weeks in office, he signed a slew of executive orders, with one focused on the construction of an American Iron Dome. The order addressed the need for the implementation of a next-generation missile defense shield to protect the homeland "against ballistic, hypersonic, advanced cruise missiles, and other next-generation aerial attacks," as well as to "further the goals of peace through strength."
5 THINGS TO KNOW ABOUT PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP'S 'IRON DOME' PLAN FOR AMERICA
Sacher explained that when it comes to missile defense, the U.S. needs a more extensive system than Israel's to grapple with distant adversaries.
Rocket scientist Ari Sacher says an American Iron Dome should be different from Israel's system. (Getty Images)
"To defend the U.S. homeland, as the president wants to do, you need something completely different," he said. "You're defending against rockets not launched from Canada or Mexico… you're defending against rockets that are launched from North Korea, from China, from Russia, potentially, and you need something far more complex than [an] Iron Dome to shoot it down."
The rocket scientist, who has expertise in missile defense, further detailed how the system could look under President Trump.
"What the president is looking at is something that probably would be called space-based intercept. You bring up a whole bunch of interceptors into outer space, and the whole intercept will take place in outer space. So if you want to call it ‘Iron Dome’ or you want to call it ‘Fred,’ doesn't make a difference, it's not [an] Iron Dome."
However achieved, Sacher believes that the American Iron Dome's chances of success are "excellent," and that "the U.S. has a tremendous amount of engineers and gumption." The expert also pointed out the threats that U.S. missile defense could address with the more complex shield compared to that of the Israeli system.
"We're talking about Korea and points west, China's even farther. That's the threats America has to look at, our near-peer threats."
He continued, comparing those threats to those of the Middle East.
"Things like Gaza and Hezbollah, that's just too small," he said. "That's a minor league United States of America."
Sacher also revealed the key challenge when it comes to missile defense systems.
"There's a whole new slew of technologies that are needed to do this sort of thing. [The] most difficult one is, believe it or not, not the interceptor, it's not the launcher. The most difficult thing is [not even] getting it into outer space. The most difficult thing is controlling everything," he stressed.
He broke down the different elements one needs to be aware of while operating the Iron Dome.
"It's understanding what we call sky picture," Sacher stressed. "You got to know when you're shooting an Iron Dome. You got to know who's firing on you, how many, which is a good guy, which is a bad guy. 'What's that 777 landing at the airport? Can't shoot that down.' Imagine doing all of that in outer space. And there's so much more to take care of and there's so much more that could go wrong, and you have to take account of all these things."
Emphasizing the importance of control, Sacher said that once the situation is resolved in space, the system can be applied for use on Earth.
"If you can solve that problem in outer space, then you can use it on the ground for a whole bunch of other control problems; controlling fires, controlling electric grids, controlling everything… That's the secret: control."
www.foxbusiness.com
I believe BrainChip is at the intersection of AI and space technology at exactly the right point in time. Especially if satellites are equipped with neuromorphic vision sensors and neuromorphic processors (ie. AKIDA) for real-time detection, tracking, and interception of the proposed US Iron Dome defense system.
As rocket scientist Ari Sacher states ""If you can solve that problem in outer space, then you can use it on the ground for a whole bunch of other control problems; controlling fires, controlling electric grids, controlling everything… That's the secret: control."
If you click onto the article linked below, you can check out the video with Ari Sachar's interview. At 3.21 mins in he says "I worked together with Raytheon. I was actually the manager of Raytheon from our company in a project called David's Sling. And Raytheon did a whole bunch of meaningful stuff. They designed the computer. They designed a whole bunch of other stuff. They have a tremendous cadre of scientists there. That was about 10 years ago. I don't beleive anything has changed. The Unites States has some amazing scientists and if the government decides to fund this to how much is necessary, then you guys are going to blow everything out of the water. I have absolutely no suspicion otherwise."
His company is Rafael Advanced Defense Systems which I posted about previously. Raytheon and Rafael Advanced Defense Systems have collaborated on multiple defense projects, particularly in missile and air defense systems.
Published February 16, 2025 7:00am EST
US Iron Dome needs to be 'far more complex' to deal with 'near-peer threats,' expert says
By Agustin Hays FOXBusiness
US needs something 'far more complex' than Iron Dome, rocket scientist says
Rocket scientist Ari Sacher explains the capabilities of the Iron Dome missile defense system, why the U.S. needs something more complex and comments on the arms sale to Israel.President Donald Trump is seeking to bolster the defense of the American homeland with a U.S.-style Iron Dome missile system. However, one expert believes that a system similar to Israel's is "not needed."
"So let me tell you at the outset, the president is using the term ‘Iron Dome’ as a metaphor," rocket scientist Ari Sacher said during an interview on FOX Business' "Mornings with Maria" Monday. "It's perfect for defending Israel from Gaza, Lebanon, it is not something that the United States needs very much."
In President Trump's first few weeks in office, he signed a slew of executive orders, with one focused on the construction of an American Iron Dome. The order addressed the need for the implementation of a next-generation missile defense shield to protect the homeland "against ballistic, hypersonic, advanced cruise missiles, and other next-generation aerial attacks," as well as to "further the goals of peace through strength."
5 THINGS TO KNOW ABOUT PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP'S 'IRON DOME' PLAN FOR AMERICA
Sacher explained that when it comes to missile defense, the U.S. needs a more extensive system than Israel's to grapple with distant adversaries.
Rocket scientist Ari Sacher says an American Iron Dome should be different from Israel's system. (Getty Images)
"To defend the U.S. homeland, as the president wants to do, you need something completely different," he said. "You're defending against rockets not launched from Canada or Mexico… you're defending against rockets that are launched from North Korea, from China, from Russia, potentially, and you need something far more complex than [an] Iron Dome to shoot it down."
The rocket scientist, who has expertise in missile defense, further detailed how the system could look under President Trump.
"What the president is looking at is something that probably would be called space-based intercept. You bring up a whole bunch of interceptors into outer space, and the whole intercept will take place in outer space. So if you want to call it ‘Iron Dome’ or you want to call it ‘Fred,’ doesn't make a difference, it's not [an] Iron Dome."
Stuart Varney: Trump's 'Iron Dome' dream provoked a typical media response
'Varney & Co.' host Stuart Varney discusses President Donald Trump's plan for an American 'Iron Dome.'However achieved, Sacher believes that the American Iron Dome's chances of success are "excellent," and that "the U.S. has a tremendous amount of engineers and gumption." The expert also pointed out the threats that U.S. missile defense could address with the more complex shield compared to that of the Israeli system.
"We're talking about Korea and points west, China's even farther. That's the threats America has to look at, our near-peer threats."
He continued, comparing those threats to those of the Middle East.
"Things like Gaza and Hezbollah, that's just too small," he said. "That's a minor league United States of America."
Sacher also revealed the key challenge when it comes to missile defense systems.
Trump’s ‘Iron Dome’ plan is being ‘overlooked’ by the media, expert says
8VC managing partner Joe Lonsdale joins ‘Mornings with Maria’ to provide analysis of President Donald Trump’s eye-opening plan to build an American ‘Iron Dome.’"There's a whole new slew of technologies that are needed to do this sort of thing. [The] most difficult one is, believe it or not, not the interceptor, it's not the launcher. The most difficult thing is [not even] getting it into outer space. The most difficult thing is controlling everything," he stressed.
He broke down the different elements one needs to be aware of while operating the Iron Dome.
"It's understanding what we call sky picture," Sacher stressed. "You got to know when you're shooting an Iron Dome. You got to know who's firing on you, how many, which is a good guy, which is a bad guy. 'What's that 777 landing at the airport? Can't shoot that down.' Imagine doing all of that in outer space. And there's so much more to take care of and there's so much more that could go wrong, and you have to take account of all these things."
Israel's Iron Dome is not 100%, must get better with drones: Yuval Steinitz
Former Israel finance minister Yuval Steinitz discusses the technology behind the Iron Dome system as Hamas missile attacks continue on 'Cavuto: Coast to Coast.'Emphasizing the importance of control, Sacher said that once the situation is resolved in space, the system can be applied for use on Earth.
"If you can solve that problem in outer space, then you can use it on the ground for a whole bunch of other control problems; controlling fires, controlling electric grids, controlling everything… That's the secret: control."
US Iron Dome needs to be 'far more complex' to deal with 'near-peer threats,' expert says
Rocket scientist Ari Sacher explains how an American Iron Dome missile shield needs to be different and more complex than Israel's system, with a focus on "control."
Last edited:
SharesForBrekky
Regular
I just came across an interesting article which explains very well the importance of Nintendo now using Hall-effect joysticks for their upcoming Switch 2:
"Hall-effect sticks address the problem of drift by removing the wiper from the equation; there is no physical, mechanical contact that could degrade. In Hall-effect sticks, the wiper is replaced by a magnet, and the resistive contact strip is replaced by a flat conductor, called a Hall element, that is sensitive to magnetic fields. A sensor reads the effect of those magnetic fields on the conductor and translates them into in-game movements, without contact."
"So if Hall-effect sticks seem superior to their potentiometer-powered peers, why don’t all controllers use them? Some of it comes down to price, Mokhtari said, as potentiometers are produced at a scale that makes them more cost effective to use. Potentiometers are a time-tested, inexpensive option. Plus, if your controller fails, as it ultimately will with use, a company like Nintendo or PlayStation would certainly be happy to sell you a new one at full retail price.
But with Joy-Con stick drift being an albatross around the neck of the otherwise highly successful Switch — and the Nintendo footing the cost of repairing Joy-Cons with stick drift — Nintendo seems ready to move on to longer-lasting, slightly more expensive Hall-effect stick technology."
Who knows whether neuromorphic technology will be used to assist/work with the Hall-effect sensors, to help reduce any issues that may arise, such as the costs involved.
Bravo
If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its biceps💪!
Obviously we're hoping that Nintendo will incorporate our technology to help offset the power consumption for extended battery life. 
Published 10:51 14 Feb 2025 GMT
Dan Lipscombe
We’re counting down the days until 2 April when Nintendo reveals more about the Switch 2 hardware and, hopefully, puts lots of minds at ease.
Since the first trailer was dropped for the new Nintendo console, fans have been speculating about the inner workings of the device.
The Switch 2 will be with us this year and fans are speculating on its potential battery life
One of the biggest questions on the lips of every fan, regards the battery life, for a portable device, just how good will it be? How long will it last?
Some fans are very worried it won’t last long on one charge due to the upgraded power of the hardware.
Others are more optimistic, with one fan guessing, “I imagine they will target a 4-hour minimum battery life through a combination over downclocking and a larger battery than switch 1.”
The fanbase flipflops back and forth on this topic.
Of course, until we get official word, it’s hard to know how the console will perform in handheld mode.
One fan is feeling pretty good about things, saying, “2.5 hours of Handheld RDR2? I mean that's not too bad.”
Realistically, the device could last for a while on its battery, but with more demanding games, any handheld hardware will struggle to go beyond three hours.
“Battery life vs performance is a very tightly choreographed dance. If they maxed out performance (and could somehow keep it cool), you'd be looking at probably less than 30 minutes of battery life,” explains Robbitjuice.
Optimisation will be a big part of its success, and of course, the hardware will go through revisions in its life.
As SharkTheDeepfan830 says, “It will probably have less battery life as it's powerful. Once it gets more revisions, it will have better battery life IMO.”
Now we wait for Nintendo to say more, but personally, if it can play powerful games for a couple of hours on the battery, I’d be happy. My Steam Deck only lasts 90 minutes on new games nowadays.
www.gamingbible.com
Published 10:51 14 Feb 2025 GMT
Nintendo Switch 2 battery life is already dividing fans
Fans are split
Dan Lipscombe
We’re counting down the days until 2 April when Nintendo reveals more about the Switch 2 hardware and, hopefully, puts lots of minds at ease.
Since the first trailer was dropped for the new Nintendo console, fans have been speculating about the inner workings of the device.
The Switch 2 will be with us this year and fans are speculating on its potential battery life
One of the biggest questions on the lips of every fan, regards the battery life, for a portable device, just how good will it be? How long will it last?
Some fans are very worried it won’t last long on one charge due to the upgraded power of the hardware.
Others are more optimistic, with one fan guessing, “I imagine they will target a 4-hour minimum battery life through a combination over downclocking and a larger battery than switch 1.”
The fanbase flipflops back and forth on this topic.
Of course, until we get official word, it’s hard to know how the console will perform in handheld mode.
One fan is feeling pretty good about things, saying, “2.5 hours of Handheld RDR2? I mean that's not too bad.”
Realistically, the device could last for a while on its battery, but with more demanding games, any handheld hardware will struggle to go beyond three hours.
“Battery life vs performance is a very tightly choreographed dance. If they maxed out performance (and could somehow keep it cool), you'd be looking at probably less than 30 minutes of battery life,” explains Robbitjuice.
Optimisation will be a big part of its success, and of course, the hardware will go through revisions in its life.
As SharkTheDeepfan830 says, “It will probably have less battery life as it's powerful. Once it gets more revisions, it will have better battery life IMO.”
Now we wait for Nintendo to say more, but personally, if it can play powerful games for a couple of hours on the battery, I’d be happy. My Steam Deck only lasts 90 minutes on new games nowadays.
Nintendo Switch 2 battery life is already dividing fans
Nintendo Switch 2 battery life is questioned by fans, splitting opinion
And yet RTX hasn't signed their subcontractor agreement to make a start on trialling akida, even though AFRL will pay them to give it a go. Have they lost it?This article was posted online 11 hours ago .
I believe BrainChip is at the intersection of AI and space technology at exactly the right point in time. Especially if satellites are equipped with neuromorphic vision sensors and neuromorphic processors (ie. AKIDA) for real-time detection, tracking, and interception of the proposed US Iron Dome defense system.
As rocket scientist Ari Sacher states ""If you can solve that problem in outer space, then you can use it on the ground for a whole bunch of other control problems; controlling fires, controlling electric grids, controlling everything… That's the secret: control."
If you click onto the article linked below, you can check out the video with Ari Sachar's interview. At 3.21 mins in he says "I worked together with Raytheon. I was actually the manager of Raytheon from our company in a project called David's Sling. And Raytheon did a whole bunch of meaningful stuff. They designed the computer. They designed a whole bunch of other stuff. They have a tremendous cadre of scientists there. That was about 10 years ago. I don't beleive anything has changed. The Unites States has some amazing scientists and if the government decides to fund this to how much is necessary, then you guys are going to blow everything out of the water. I have absolutely no suspicion otherwise."
His company is Rafael Advanced Defense Systems which I posted about previously. Raytheon and Rafael Advanced Defense Systems have collaborated on multiple defense projects, particularly in missile and air defense systems.
View attachment 77658
View attachment 77659
Published February 16, 2025 7:00am EST
US Iron Dome needs to be 'far more complex' to deal with 'near-peer threats,' expert says
By Agustin Hays FOXBusiness
US needs something 'far more complex' than Iron Dome, rocket scientist says
Rocket scientist Ari Sacher explains the capabilities of the Iron Dome missile defense system, why the U.S. needs something more complex and comments on the arms sale to Israel.
President Donald Trump is seeking to bolster the defense of the American homeland with a U.S.-style Iron Dome missile system. However, one expert believes that a system similar to Israel's is "not needed."
"So let me tell you at the outset, the president is using the term ‘Iron Dome’ as a metaphor," rocket scientist Ari Sacher said during an interview on FOX Business' "Mornings with Maria" Monday. "It's perfect for defending Israel from Gaza, Lebanon, it is not something that the United States needs very much."
In President Trump's first few weeks in office, he signed a slew of executive orders, with one focused on the construction of an American Iron Dome. The order addressed the need for the implementation of a next-generation missile defense shield to protect the homeland "against ballistic, hypersonic, advanced cruise missiles, and other next-generation aerial attacks," as well as to "further the goals of peace through strength."
5 THINGS TO KNOW ABOUT PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP'S 'IRON DOME' PLAN FOR AMERICA
Sacher explained that when it comes to missile defense, the U.S. needs a more extensive system than Israel's to grapple with distant adversaries.
Rocket scientist Ari Sacher says an American Iron Dome should be different from Israel's system. (Getty Images)
"To defend the U.S. homeland, as the president wants to do, you need something completely different," he said. "You're defending against rockets not launched from Canada or Mexico… you're defending against rockets that are launched from North Korea, from China, from Russia, potentially, and you need something far more complex than [an] Iron Dome to shoot it down."
The rocket scientist, who has expertise in missile defense, further detailed how the system could look under President Trump.
"What the president is looking at is something that probably would be called space-based intercept. You bring up a whole bunch of interceptors into outer space, and the whole intercept will take place in outer space. So if you want to call it ‘Iron Dome’ or you want to call it ‘Fred,’ doesn't make a difference, it's not [an] Iron Dome."
Stuart Varney: Trump's 'Iron Dome' dream provoked a typical media response
'Varney & Co.' host Stuart Varney discusses President Donald Trump's plan for an American 'Iron Dome.'
However achieved, Sacher believes that the American Iron Dome's chances of success are "excellent," and that "the U.S. has a tremendous amount of engineers and gumption." The expert also pointed out the threats that U.S. missile defense could address with the more complex shield compared to that of the Israeli system.
"We're talking about Korea and points west, China's even farther. That's the threats America has to look at, our near-peer threats."
He continued, comparing those threats to those of the Middle East.
"Things like Gaza and Hezbollah, that's just too small," he said. "That's a minor league United States of America."
Sacher also revealed the key challenge when it comes to missile defense systems.
Trump’s ‘Iron Dome’ plan is being ‘overlooked’ by the media, expert says
8VC managing partner Joe Lonsdale joins ‘Mornings with Maria’ to provide analysis of President Donald Trump’s eye-opening plan to build an American ‘Iron Dome.’
"There's a whole new slew of technologies that are needed to do this sort of thing. [The] most difficult one is, believe it or not, not the interceptor, it's not the launcher. The most difficult thing is [not even] getting it into outer space. The most difficult thing is controlling everything," he stressed.
He broke down the different elements one needs to be aware of while operating the Iron Dome.
"It's understanding what we call sky picture," Sacher stressed. "You got to know when you're shooting an Iron Dome. You got to know who's firing on you, how many, which is a good guy, which is a bad guy. 'What's that 777 landing at the airport? Can't shoot that down.' Imagine doing all of that in outer space. And there's so much more to take care of and there's so much more that could go wrong, and you have to take account of all these things."
Israel's Iron Dome is not 100%, must get better with drones: Yuval Steinitz
Former Israel finance minister Yuval Steinitz discusses the technology behind the Iron Dome system as Hamas missile attacks continue on 'Cavuto: Coast to Coast.'
Emphasizing the importance of control, Sacher said that once the situation is resolved in space, the system can be applied for use on Earth.
"If you can solve that problem in outer space, then you can use it on the ground for a whole bunch of other control problems; controlling fires, controlling electric grids, controlling everything… That's the secret: control."
US Iron Dome needs to be 'far more complex' to deal with 'near-peer threats,' expert says
Rocket scientist Ari Sacher explains how an American Iron Dome missile shield needs to be different and more complex than Israel's system, with a focus on "control."
uiux
Regular
Honestly Eye Sea Key,
Where do you come up with this information ?
You are in fact correct in saying that, AFRL are (in effect) paying a fee as part of the parent contract, which Brainchip won (awarded) for 1.8 Million USD.......none of us really know if it was Brainchip who negotiated a third party fee of $800,000 USD or if it was imposed upon Brainchip by AFRL as part of the parent contract.
My personal opinion is that the AFRL told Brainchip who the 3rd party was going to be, to sow the entire deal together, but as I have mentioned before, the fact that Brainchip released a statement stating that we (Brainchip), were committed to pay a third party $800,000 USD, well, am I the only one on this forum who thinks the terms had already been agreed to, can you disclose a figure when the deal is still up in the air ?
Your comment that the third party is RTX......that's pure speculation, which division are you referring to Eye Sea Key ?
Collins Aerospace ?
Just the opinion of a rusted on shareholder...........Tech.
uiux
Regular
It reads like Iseki is just making shit up just so he can complain about it
Well, the award went to BRN because some fabulously well heeled defense supplier had already done some work on neuromorphioc analysis of radar-doppler signals, and AFRL wants to see if it can be done in hardware. So everyone in the defense industry knows who it is.
Moreover the $1.8 mill is chicken feed, and I'm presuming at this stage RTX is refusing to sign because it is such a measly amount they quite frankly couldn't give a damn. (Quite possibly they asked for $18Mil.) They'd probably just take that $800K off the next party bar-tab and not have to do all that peski grant acquittal stuff.
So, in answer to your question, I reckon it would be the RTX petty-cash division.
TBH, I have never been so humiliated as a shareholder, at least not since the NEUROBUS debacle, which has also ground to a halt with nothing new reported in a while. Let's face it: Where are ther photos of Sean throwing his hat in the air as images of a satelite actually working is beamed to Parkes? That is some of my evidence.
uiux
Regular
TBH, you couldn't make this stuff up.
Win a grant, and the co-applicant won't sign for LOVE NOR MONEY.
Nowadays, I imagine our founder, Peter, sitting in one of those antique telephone booths ( half desk, half uncomfortable chair, with a small comapartment for the phone), talking with Sean about "shooting to the stars", while on the other end of the line, Sean is mostly focused on a new natty NVIDIA device that analyzes his golf swing and that can, at the flick of a switch, run hilights of the hit show SUCCESSION, which he will show at the upcoming board meeting.
Is it any wonder I'm complaining?!
uiux
Regular
How do you know if they have or haven't signed?
What are they exactly signing?
Who is the contractor?
Does it include an IP deal?
What instructions came from AFRL?
What radar device is it?
What does the 800k entail?
Spare me the fan fiction Iseki - you have zero idea what you should even complain about in regards to the AFRL grant. You don't even know if it relates to RTX as the contractor.
I'd be more humiliated typing the shit you have in the last few posts more than anything else
The time is nigh to decide if your loyalty is to the founders' invention, or (exclusive) , to someone given the job of commercializing that invention.
Uiux, I'm not going to argue with you.
You have done more for Brainchip than Stevens and Telson combined, thou possibly not as much as Gelsinger who has sent Intel broke.
Time will tell if the AFRL deal is a right royal stuff-up, or a stroke of genius.
Pom down under
Top 20
One thing seems certain is that the Navy is transitioning to AI at the Edge. See previously posted Bascom Hunter/Navy transitioning posts.
It's likely US defense forces and security will transition also. Space as well.
I very much doubt RTX and Lockheed-Martin will allow Bascom to eat the whole cake.
Did I hear Sean say during the podcast something about Bascom heading for great things???
It's likely US defense forces and security will transition also. Space as well.
I very much doubt RTX and Lockheed-Martin will allow Bascom to eat the whole cake.
Did I hear Sean say during the podcast something about Bascom heading for great things???
Similar threads
