The use of the word HOSTILITY has many connotations which can be misinterpreted many ways....Well that seems like a reasonable view
I agree that generally speaking it is always wise to realise there may be unknowns in any situation. Just ask anyone claiming as fact that the outstanding fees at the ICSID had been paid with Locke funds lol
However all of the arguments regarding Dathomir's 15% are known
Cong’s own lawyer admitted in court that completion occurs upon payment under Article 2.1 of the SPA’s
Cong’s argument is that he had the right to terminate citing an Article from OHADA but that rule is about negotiations using an expert to value the shares in an absence of agreements not a get out of contracts free card
Cong signed the SPA’s, convened EGM’s to ratify and even got notary deeds to confirm his intention to be bound to the agreements
Tick tock imo
Although as I've stated here previously I do agree it will then depend on whether the DRC Supreme Court does the right thing on this matter which remains to be seen
I mainly asked because our good friend voldergeist does have a problem admitting that his mate Cong made a bad deal and then tried to back out of it like a dirty little rat
Don’t take the hostility personally. I’ve been dropping mountains of facts for years now and I still cop it regularly. If you had been lurking all this time you should understand that is how things are here.
It's not wisdom. I just wanted to further add to a discussion and provoke some others to share their thoughts. There's no doubt I have a bunch of things wrong but I'm just doing my best based on what I do know.
Not sure what you are getting at suggesting to talk to that Shane person. If my understanding is right they basically scammed a bunch of people into giving away their shares and I think that's absolutely disgusting.
There's no need to be rude to me about sharing some views on the current situation.
I agree that they probably wouldn't want the arbitration to continue. I didn't mean the arbitration isn't useful. It definitely helps apply pressure to negotiate. I was more commenting on the fact some people think the ICC case will result in some massive and immediate win. My thought is directly (the ruling) maybe not so much important if they're still hostile within the country then the block Is still there.
What day did you contact them?The use of the word HOSTILITY has many connotations which can be misinterpreted many ways....
View attachment 76183
No one has been " hostile " to @Ancient and no one has been " hostile " to you either, nor the fact you " cop it regurlarly ".......complete BS!
You are one of the most revered posters on this forum carlos.
This is a discussion form, where vigorous debate is a healthy thing, big difference between that and hostile .......IMO
"Just ask anyone claiming as fact that the outstanding fees at the ICSID had been paid with Locke funds lol "
Btw, nice subtle dig, could i construe that as being hostile ?
If you dont believe me, contact the BOD bud.
Christmas Day, wishing them and their families a very merry christmas. What about you?What day did you contact them?
I would've thought if the fees had been paid already then this would be reflected on the ICSID tracker. It seems to have been pretty up-to-date to this point. Anyway I'm sure we'll find out from the company or another channel soon enoughWhy? Because it's my impression every question you ask infers you are seeking evidence of someone having insider information, thats why.
But that's just my suspicious nature
The last announcement says AVZ no longer needs to draw upon the Locke funding facility, as CATH has provided a Pre-Completion funding facility. Not sure that can be read any other way than that no drawdowns had taken place.
I don't know for sure, but as an educated guess, I would say the funds raised from Convertible Noteholders was possibly used to pay the fees, or simply out of the general pot. I think it's too early to say the CATH funds are available, and AVZ say as much - 'end of January for $10m'
I'm assuming the fees have been paid - I don't know that either, but I am relying on comments from credible others. In the end it's a minor detail as they have a few more weeks to pay anyway
Hope this helps in some small way
The last ann says AVZ no longer needs to draw upon the LOCKE as CATh has provided a PRE COMPLETION FUNDING FACILITY .Why? Because it's my impression every question you ask infers you are seeking evidence of someone having insider information, thats why.
But that's just my suspicious nature
The last announcement says AVZ no longer needs to draw upon the Locke funding facility, as CATH has provided a Pre-Completion funding facility. Not sure that can be read any other way than that no drawdowns had taken place.
I don't know for sure, but as an educated guess, I would say the funds raised from Convertible Noteholders was possibly used to pay the fees, or simply out of the general pot. I think it's too early to say the CATH funds are available, and AVZ say as much - 'end of January for $10m'
I'm assuming the fees have been paid - I don't know that either, but I am relying on comments from credible others. In the end it's a minor detail as they have a few more weeks to pay anyway
Hope this helps in some small way
AVZ gonna last about 2 seconds after the ML is secured imo . Someone must have shown the thickheads in the DRC Gov the amount of $$$ they gonna get from the sale . Now they be on the down low working out what offshore bank accounts they can stuff a $$Billion $$ into . imoView attachment 76151
but don't know if there's any corresponding restrictions for AVZ to sell to a saudi company for example.
Saudi's and CATH would probably be quite happy with a JV. Both own the mine, CATH makes batteries in middle east
I detect a slight undertone of jealousy that sandgropers have a slight advantage, the AGM is always in their backyard.The use of the word HOSTILITY has many connotations which can be misinterpreted many ways....
View attachment 76183
No one has been " hostile " to @Ancient and no one has been " hostile " to you either, nor the fact you " cop it regurlarly ".......complete BS!
You are one of the most revered posters on this forum carlos.
This is a discussion form, where vigorous debate is a healthy thing, big difference between that and hostile .......IMO
"Just ask anyone claiming as fact that the outstanding fees at the ICSID had been paid with Locke funds lol "
Btw, nice subtle dig, could i construe that as being hostile ?
If you dont believe me, contact the BOD bud.
In keeping with the theme...Well I went out today to buy a pair of camouflage pants , but I could not find any
There is something written in the JV about selling/transferring, timing and FROR of shares in the Dathcom JV.AVZ gonna last about 2 seconds after the ML is secured imo . Someone must have shown the thickheads in the DRC Gov the amount of $$$ they gonna get from the sale . Now they be on the down low working out what offshore bank accounts they can stuff a $$Billion $$ into . imo
Maybe we should show the COMAPNY ANNOUNCEMENT and conditions...!"""""""DONT see no J V mentioned""""PRE-COMPLETION you twat
Thats pre-completion of the JV and other arrangements etc etc - no strings attached, only the usual 'no material adverse change and standard conditions' etc - 10m unsecured
everything else relates to the JV
margarita time down the road for me - bye
This post was to correct the bullshit and misinformation contained in the post that was reported and taken down within 5 minutes, bye again