JDelekto
Regular
I don't think using Intel in this case is an "either/or" situation. The marketing/research materials may have mentioned Intel because it is a more recognizable brand. I think as BrainChip's IP is integrated into higher-tier manufacturing, its name may fade into obscurity except for those in the business of supplying these chips.The cynical part of me says that MB just want a press release with 'Intel' on it but then will quietly use Akida because it is the superior product. If they don't know that already and all we've been told is true then they will soon find it out. Either way, it's not a bad outcome for us. What we need though is another public endorsement of Akida by MB or another party asap.
It is estimated there are about sixty (60) to one hundred (100) sensors in today's average vehicle. Some of these are in use while in motion (where power can be generated), while others are used while is considered "turned off". Akida excels in low power use, such as a vehicle being turned off, where it can detect wake keywords, driver presence, passenger (child) presence, and perhaps security sensors.
I do not think Akida is excluded from the picture when designing processors for use in the automotive industry, including their listed partner, MB.
As a side note regarding the Intel Foundry/BrainChip relationship: Intel Foundries are agnostic to their competitors. They provide the tooling and services to manufacture chips from IP, they are not competitive in the IP itself, but more so in the manufacturing process. They are more competitors to TMSC if anything.