BRN Discussion Ongoing

[Gies]

Nice commercial

 

[Quatrojos]

Top 6 Gen AI Projects from South Korean Tech Giants

As AI continues to permeate various sectors, the emerging concept of "super-giant AI" has gained considerable momentum. Hence, we witness

www.koreatechtoday.com

Slowly, slowly, catch the monkey...

 

[IloveLamp]

 

[Boab]

Top 6 Gen AI Projects from South Korean Tech Giants

As AI continues to permeate various sectors, the emerging concept of "super-giant AI" has gained considerable momentum. Hence, we witness

www.koreatechtoday.com

Slowly, slowly, catch the monkey...


View attachment 48523

 

[Pom down under]

Hey Pom ()

Back at the end of August 2023 we had 145,518,762 shares shorted = 8.21% (in the top 10 most shorted shares)

Now towards end of October we had around 102,149,833 shares shorted = 5.71%

So significantly lower within just 2 months ...now 27th in most shorted shares!

So it's been dropping off gradually now for the last 4/5 weeks and may it continue.

View attachment 48521
View attachment 48522

Currently it’s at 6.41% and increasing

 

[Boab]

Currently it’s at 6.41% and increasing View attachment 48526

Am I reading this wrong?? The figures you are suppling are for June??
Cheers

 

[McHale]

hi, frank
I think you have misinterpreted what i meant. The comment was not to complaint about australian investors, but complaint about the way we present all the valuable partners. What i meant was that the way or style of investor promotion that the management currently adopts is one of the main reason that only a small fraction of the 30000+ registered brn shareholders understood the companys progress well. People who follow the social media platforms and this forum regularly obviously will have a much clearer picture, but we are only a very small group of shareholders.

No offence was intended in my comment.

Cheers

Spot on @stan9614, I am in strong agreement on this, BRN should be putting up general announcements on the companies they are incorporating into their eco-system.

These announcements do not meet the "Price Sensitive Announcements" spec, however the ASX platform also has the option to post straight up "Announcements".

Every day you can see mining companies making announcements about Conferences which they are presenting at, they are put up as general announcements _ which simply inform shareholders of the companies' efforts to promote their business there is no comeback from the ASX regarding this type of announcement which is used on the ASX platform every day.

IMO all the eco-system and partnership milestones should have been announced on the ASX this year and last year, I really think that some of the ecosystem milestones were quite likely price sensitive material i.e. the deal with Global Foundries to fabricate a new iteration of Akida - that deal demonstrated the ability of Akida to be fabricated by different manufacturers using differing fab formats - that is a major outcome for the Akida tech and as such is worthy of Price Sensitive.

I listened to Antonio (or was it Sean?) being questioned about BRNs policy re ASX Anns. at the AGM this year and I felt that they don't really understand the Anns platform, there has been talk on here and HC about fluff Anns etc, but IMO the ecosystem BRN is building is not fluff at all, it is really the bridge to get Akida to market, and is incredibly important as such.

BRN really need to pull their head out of the sand on this, it is probably my biggest gripe with management.

I will be contacting T Dawe about this because what I have read so far has not convinced me that the ASX platform could be used by BRN to promote what they are achieving with building the business

 

[buena suerte :-)]

Currently it’s at 6.41% and increasing View attachment 48526

They are for June 2023, Pom ??

 

[buena suerte :-)]

Am I reading this wrong?? The figures you are suppling are for June??
Cheers

Reading it the same Boab ...

 

[Pom down under]

Am I reading this wrong?? The figures you are suppling are for June??
Cheers

 

[Pom down under]

Reading it the same Boab ...

 

[buena suerte :-)]

View attachment 48529

 

[buena suerte :-)]

Nice commercial

He didn't like our name!..."Might have to re -brand it" ????? Don't be ridiculous man ....I've already bought the plates...

Thanks @Gies

 

[Adam]

Hey, shorters. Lets agree only to post on BRN..and not short positions..whatever they are. For better..or for worse. This will leave us serious investeors to view quality posts, either way, and less spam volume in these threads. Sound like a plan? Thank you in advance...

 

[Diogenese]

Spot on @stan9614, I am in strong agreement on this, BRN should be putting up general announcements on the companies they are incorporating into their eco-system.

These announcements do not meet the "Price Sensitive Announcements" spec, however the ASX platform also has the option to post straight up "Announcements".

Every day you can see mining companies making announcements about Conferences which they are presenting at, they are put up as general announcements _ which simply inform shareholders of the companies' efforts to promote their business there is no comeback from the ASX regarding this type of announcement which is used on the ASX platform every day.

IMO all the eco-system and partnership milestones should have been announced on the ASX this year and last year, I really think that some of the ecosystem milestones were quite likely price sensitive material i.e. the deal with Global Foundries to fabricate a new iteration of Akida - that deal demonstrated the ability of Akida to be fabricated by different manufacturers using differing fab formats - that is a major outcome for the Akida tech and as such is worthy of Price Sensitive.

I listened to Antonio (or was it Sean?) being questioned about BRNs policy re ASX Anns. at the AGM this year and I felt that they don't really understand the Anns platform, there has been talk on here and HC about fluff Anns etc, but IMO the ecosystem BRN is building is not fluff at all, it is really the bridge to get Akida to market, and is incredibly important as such.

BRN really need to pull their head out of the sand on this, it is probably my biggest gripe with management.

I will be contacting T Dawe about this because what I have read so far has not convinced me that the ASX platform could be used by BRN to promote what they are achieving with building the business

Hi McH,

There was a time under the ebullient Lou "Hockey Sticks" Dinardo when reference was made to "a major North American vehicle maker" which drew a "please explain" from ASX and caused a possible breach of an NDA when we were forced to disclose Ford as an EAP.

Not only that, but it was a blot on our escutcheon, which has the potential to turn around and bite us on the hindquarters when we seek NYSE registration - our first yellow card.

Because the ASX, being gun-shy of tech companies since getting their fingers burnt in the dotcom bubble, is red hot on tech startups. (Don't you just love a metaphor salad?)

The company is well aware of the disgruntlement of the roiling mass of commentators on TSEx in relation to announcements, but they have chosen to be like Caesar's wife in this regard.

Being a bit of a share market ingenue back in 2018 when I first came across BRN, my first purchase was in FOMO mode because I read that PvdM was about to make a presentation to a gaggle of geeks in the US in the following week, and I expected that would launch us to the moon and beyond.* Not a sausage ...

So I think that, as far as management's concern for shareholders goes, they have their eye on the main prize, NYSE registration, and doing anything to pump the ASX price would earn a second yellow card.

*(I still expect that every day now.)

 

[Pom down under]

Hey, shorters. Lets agree only to post on BRN..and not short positions..whatever they are. For better..or for worse. This will leave us serious investeors to view quality posts, either way, and less spam volume in these threads. Sound like a plan? Thank you in advance...

 

[stockduck]

Maybe of interest? It is a video on youtube, I guess seven days ago from posting....

https ://eightify.app/summary/artificial-intelligence/apple-s-game-changing-ai-revolutionizing-the-tech-industry
https ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0Y7j2_9fIM&t=12s


"....
03:05
Apple is considering two methods for implementing generative AI: on-device AI, which works directly on the device and is good for privacy and battery life but may be less powerful due to hardware limitations, and cloud-based AI, which processes AI on remote servers.
...."

 

[TasTroy77]

Samsung Unveils 2024 Generative AI Roadmap for Home Appliances

Samsung Electronics is set to introduce its line of home appliances with the integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) features

www.koreatechtoday.com

 

[MrRomper]

@Diogenese please review my homework.
https://image-ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/11803741

 

[McHale]

Totally agree with your post ........... what some posters here are failing to realise, is that at the last AGM there was ~174 Million votes cast against the renumeration report being adopted, thus resulting in the "Strike 1" outcome ................ As all here should well and truely appreciate, is that out voting or negating that previous vote of ~174 Million vote imo is going to be a mammoth task both for us shareholders, as well as that of the Co.

Does anyone here have any idea(s) on who actually cast those 174 million votes?

Was it retail holders, if it was, then was it a group of retailers who were networked on a platform or forum.

Was it an institutional holder(s), what might their motive have been.

Was it a mixture of retail and institutional, but bottom line for me is - and has been, unless we know who the holders were that voted down the remuneration package, then all that can be done is speculation with no clear understanding of what or who motivated that vote.

Now on another matter, and I am working on a distant memory here, which is of a previous AGM, where there was a large vote against PvDM, I can't remember what it was in relation to - perhaps his (re)nomination to the Board, but I do have a recollection of a large vote against PVDM at a previous AGM. There was talk about it over at HC at the time my recollection is that after some discussion it remained a mystery.