Yet he mentions nothing on the ICC ann last week….thanks mate. A simple reporting of the announcement for a change
Yet he mentions nothing on the ICC ann last week….thanks mate. A simple reporting of the announcement for a change
If the President or his Ministers do not step in to resolve this SHITSHOW by the end of this month than he will be fair game on Twitter
View attachment 36552
His use of the Chinese version of Zijin's 2022 Annual Report when an English version was available, plus the typically Chinese phrase 'conditioning values' tells me he's a Chinese stooge.
So it's off to the naughty corner (ignore) for him.
If the Zijin/Comminere case gets the go ahead Zijin will pull out of the July hearing . They will chew up as much time as is allowed leading up to it and pull out . I'd put the the Z / C case (if gets the green light ) at perhaps first quarter 2024 . They will likely delay that as well . So at a guess I reckon mid 2024 for the hearing and around August /Sept 2024 for a verdict . Clearly we need this sh1t show over this year before the election . Plan B Nigel . IMOThe ramifications would be that the Zijin + Cominiere ICC case isn't instantly thrown out since it was lodged before the injunction.
My thinking on the timing is that AVZ tried to have the ICC just throw the case out with the Emergency Proceedings, or at least suspend it until AVZ v Cominiere is finalized (we announced April 17).
So the new timeline of events in terms of the ICC could be:
Someone peer review this for me?
- Zijin vs AVZ - July Jurisdiction Hearing, August verdict
- AVZ vs Cominiere - Preliminary steps, selecting arbitrators, document discovery, timeline setting for proceedings (September)
- Zijin/Cominiere vs AVZ - Suspended until further notice
- 3 can only go forward if 1 rules in Zijin's favour and;
- if 2 rules in Cominiere's favour (but the final verdict for this should be in like 2024-2025)
That’s a lovely portrait Beisha. A real turn-on.
I think your answer lies in the fact we all come from different backgrounds, and individually have different proclivities as your gif suggests for yourself, and, need to respect that.
For example, I’m a keen listener and if I don’t understand a word or concept I ask or check and accordingly adopt What works for me and it may not work for you. Tough titties.
You won’t find me using the word “kunt” and it has never crossed my mind till now why a few here do, perhaps it’s their misogynistic proclivities or homoerotic howling to the group think here.
It’s likely the Congolese have checked the word “kunt” and are lost. The Chinese with their e-dictionaries “meiYou”. Really some of you need to crawl out of your parochial shells and grow up a bit, more.
In recent times, the only time I haven’t listened when it really mattered and I’m sorry for my family, was that I didn’t heed Der Geist’s warning crystal clear end of April ‘22, that AVZ was being ambushed.
We need to suck it up perhaps for not much longer but if we do end up in the ditch, we can only blame ourselves for adopting the herd mentality.
His use of the Chinese version of Zijin's 2022 Annual Report when an English version was available, plus the typically Chinese phrase 'conditioning values' tells me he's a Chinese stooge.
So it's off to the naughty corner (ignore) for him.
Yet he mentions nothing on the ICC ann last week….
What are the ramifications of the ICC submission being on or around April 28th and prior to the AVZ injunction succeeding?
Does it have significant implications in the way this can play out?
9card has provided a response, but the only point I was making earlier was that the 50k 'fines' wouldn't apply, as this was lodged before the injunction was announced, IMO
No citing Boatman or Zijin this time
His use of the Chinese version of Zijin's 2022 Annual Report when an English version was available, plus the typically Chinese phrase 'conditioning values' tells me he's a Chinese stooge.
So it's off to the naughty corner (ignore) for him.
Yet he mentions nothing on the ICC ann last week….
Easy going, Everyone’s exhaustedThis is a pathetic logic.
After 12 months, I would have thought you’d be hungry for original source materials.
Nothing has been learned I see.
This is why youre holding shares in AVZ when there was plenty of time to check the facts as illegal as they are from Dathomir, Cominiere and Zijjn
In fact as much as we are all on a China bash binge (and I mean CCP for its tyrants), the Chinese jurisdiction is actually safer than the Australian / ASX jurisdiction in terms of transparency. It records change in ownership, it publishes the alphanumeric name of the Dathcom file so all can verify.
Show me where AVZ published this file name :
CD/LSH/RCCM/19-B-00935
The Chinese partner CATH did in September 2021
Disclaimer: this problem seems to be widespread. One really does need to be on our toes
———
The Dathomir ICC matter must be due for an update. Perhaps it’s good for AVZ.
对不起,你的间谍技术太差了。
《孙子兵法》并没有让你为 TSE 做好准备。
还...
你是同性恋。