AVZ Discussion 2022

[9cardomaha]

Yes you are probably right based on the second sheet, partial renounce / waiver of 13359 ...82 Carries.

@9cardomaha do you know if there's any more sheets to this document?

View attachment 30083

Not sure if there are meant to be more pages, only have the two here i was hoping it'd be the smoking gun implicating the MOM/MOP requesting for the trade...

Another point I didn't convey before is that the Ministerial decrees also came out in the same order.

1. First 00080 approving the split
2. then 000145 awarding ML

 

[obe wan]

Yes you are probably right based on the second sheet, partial renounce / waiver of 13359 ...82 Carries.

@9cardomaha do you know if there's any more sheets to this document?

View attachment 30083

Someone put up a couple of pages out of the DRC mining code a few days ago, I can't remember who, but waivering was basically stripping of all rights, Partial waiver was pulling back of in our case the decree / Mining license but retention of exploration rights.

maybe this was the angle DG Cami took, I.e. ye big fella , partial waiver means a part of the tenement gets renounced ; where as Nigel and co may have being thinking ( you'd of hoped they'd checked ) partial just means as per the code that the ML rights come off , but Exploration rights are retained i.e as explained within the announcement when the decree popped out.

You would think that there would be another term sheet for actually fully renouncing as section of a tenement, as opposed to just calling it partial renounce and avoiding such confusion.

 

[9cardomaha]

We really need to see the application document that management filled out and signed.
With AJN involved and Nigel's holding it all smells a bit fishy.

The application from Dathcom requestin the Ministerial decrees right? Those cogs are turning.

Also following a line on AJN's applications for northern tenement at this time.

 

[Strongman]

Someone put up a couple of pages out of the DRC mining code a few days ago, I can't remember who, but waivering was basically stripping of all rights, Partial waiver was pulling back of in our case the decree / Mining license but retention of exploration rights.

maybe this was the angle DG Cami took, I.e. ye big fella , partial waiver means a part of the tenement gets renounced ; where as Nigel and co may have being thinking ( you'd of hoped they'd checked ) partial just means as per the code that the ML rights come off , but Exploration rights are retained i.e as explained within the announcement when the decree popped out.

You would think that there would be another term sheet for actually fully renouncing as section of a tenement, as opposed to just calling it partial renounce and avoiding such confusion.

Surely AVZ would have checked this before signing. Looking at the document then considering what was at stake it seems highly improbable that Nigel would have signed off on this before checking it out to the nth degree

 

[Samus]

The application from Dathcom requestin the Ministerial decrees right? Those cogs are turning.

Also following a line on AJN's applications for northern tenement at this time.

Yes apparently Dathcom reqested and submitted an application for the split. Buggered if I can remember where this was stated, maybe someone else can? I think it was recent.

 

[Mr Inappropriate]

Someone put up a couple of pages out of the DRC mining code a few days ago, I can't remember who, but waivering was basically stripping of all rights, Partial waiver was pulling back of in our case the decree / Mining license but retention of exploration rights.

maybe this was the angle DG Cami took, I.e. ye big fella , partial waiver means a part of the tenement gets renounced ; where as Nigel and co may have being thinking ( you'd of hoped they'd checked ) partial just means as per the code that the ML rights come off , but Exploration rights are retained i.e as explained within the announcement when the decree popped out.

You would think that there would be another term sheet for actually fully renouncing as section of a tenement, as opposed to just calling it partial renounce and avoiding such confusion.

It might be my post you’re referring to - it included extracts from both the mining code and the mining regs in relation to relinquishment.

AVZ Discussion 2022

Over to you Felix.......:eek::mad::unsure::cautious::poop: ECC Pastors in turn call on Dr. Mukwege to run for President in 2023 The pastors of the Churches of Christ in Congo (ECC) are asking Professor Denis Mukwege to submit his candidacy for the supreme office of the DRC. This was after a...

thestockexchange.com.au

 

[Sammy_da_Smile]

My understanding is that they required document 8196 to renounce the northern section so that they could have a PE southern and PR northern.

Unfortunately, it is my guess they were told they would have first right to reapply for it as a PR. Obviously that didn't happen.

 

[9cardomaha]

My understanding is that they required document 8196 to renounce the northern section so that they could have a PE southern and PR northern.

Unfortunately, it is my guess they were told they would have first right to reapply for it as a PR. Obviously that didn't happen.

This is 'astute'.

 

[Spikerama]

What about if we had something like this?

ICC Arbitration Jin Cheng vs AVZ

 

[Carlos Danger]

@Sammy_da_Smile @Charbella 8196 - not the bombshell i was hoping for, but the timeline currently:

Dathcom submits application to CAMI to relinquish North on April 1.
Ministerial decree 'expedited' and awareded April 22.

Looking for correspondence around March/April where there is direct request to relinquish the north for awarding the ML on the south.

View attachment 30072 View attachment 30073

 

[Sammy_da_Smile]

‘Told’ yes …… jigsaw piece …where is it written

View attachment 30090
View attachment 30091

Oh 8196 is just a fishing licence. We are all good

 

[Mr Inappropriate]

Oh 8196 is just a fishing licence. We are all good

View attachment 30093

You saw ”fishing” but missed the “Female Shirt Data”? How is that a thing?

edit: u also missed “be passionate“ and “hyper beard”. These translations are quite interesting…

 

[CashKing]

Oh 8196 is just a fishing licence. We are all good

View attachment 30093

Nope, Zijin have stolen our boat mate, So back to being fucked again…

Pricks just cannot help themselves….

GLTAH

 

[JAG]

What about if we had something like this?

ICC Arbitration Jin Cheng vs AVZ

absolutely LOVE IT!!!!!

 

[cruiser51]

What about if we had something like this?

ICC Arbitration Jin Cheng vs AVZ

And after that the dollar counter Jin Cheng took AVZ to court.


I think it was bluff and they now regret it, especially after their juicy blackmail letter.

I don't think Felix would be very amused by it, don't forget it is not with closed doors.

 

[obe wan]

looking at this thing again it does appear that the top section * renewal * waiver * without waiver * discarded squares is basically where the fore mentioned terms are applied ; but that lower section , it does appear that that’s the area where actually renouncing / giving up squares / some squares ( partial) / Carrie’s are dealt with..it would appear judging by this doc , that they did renounce the northern section

 

[JAG]

Momentum is taking shape

 

[cruiser51]

Nope, Zijin have stolen our boat mate so back to being fucked again…

Pricks just cannot help themselves….

GLTAH

Gotta be careful with all them samples in those open sheds, King Kong might steal them too.

It's good AVZ has piccies, just in case.

 

[Charbella]

 

[cruiser51]

It is in the Chinese interest to bring the court case forwards, everyday which passes they look as a country more vulgar.

Might even be smart to withdraw from the ICC case, wankers.