BRN Discussion Ongoing

[Sirod69]

I refuse to believe this BMW Valeo link is valid for us. The reason is it MAY (or may not) be another relationship that does NOT involve Brainchip. I am getting a tad fragile putting my hopes up many times only to see the SP continue to fall. A bit like Prophesee/Qualcomm/Samsung and the realistic expectation from Intel Foundries.

I agree with you, I can't convert that to BRN at the moment either. BMW/ Valeo AND Qualcomm are here in bed how far could we be with this??? @Diogenese shared patents earlier and didn't rule it out, hmm difficult

 

[BaconLover]

Looking forward to Nandan's perspective.
Would love to know the Marketing side of things, both progression and challenges.

 

[Andi85]

Looking forward to Nandan's perspective.
Would love to know the Marketing side of things, both progression and challenges.

As everyone here wish for an update from Peter

 

[BaconLover]

As everyone here wish for an update from Peter

They did say the next reference chips to be delivered in Q2 of this year.

But yeah, would be nice to know from Peter what's going on. Personally I am happy to wait until the next report because it usually does not have any immediate effect on the product as it takes a couple of years for those to come to the market.

 

[Diogenese]

I noticed the shorts have increased to 7% in a short period of time, wouldn’t be surprised if we are over 8% now. Hoping the shorts can get it to 10% for me under my circumstances. But they are wankers.

If they get to 20%, do they have to make a take over bid?

 

[Calsco]

As discussed yesterday we are sitting below support which isn’t a good place. I am hoping that we consolidate upward to sit in the 60s again. The chart indicates we are in a confirmed downward trend we are already sitting below the support and the next support isn’t until approx .48c and I pray that we don’t fall that far. The only positive is that we are coming to the pointy end of a downward triangle which could be considered a bullish pattern. Here’s hoping for some positive news!

 

[Esq.111]

Morning Diogenese,

Interesting thought...

I do not know , but I would think , if the shares actually existed ( not naked shorts ) and were one shorting entity , thay may be entitled to a seat on the board.

Or do the voting rights over shorted stock remain with the lender????? .

Who would know.......

Thankyou for all your expertise on all things of a technical nature, Greatly appreciated.

Regards,
Esq.

 

[GStocks123]

Hi mate can you link me to where it's confirmed that oculi is a partner. I must have missed it or have a really shite memory.
Thanks

Anil accidentally let it slip a while ago

Might be this one-

 

[BaconLover]

voting rights over shorted stock remain with the lender

This.

Shorts don't own the stocks, they have already sold the stocks.

Bit like loaning from a bank. They don't actually own the underlying assets, they have borrowed it, sold it and are now waiting for it to go down so they can buy it back again and return it to the lender.

 

[equanimous]

As discussed yesterday we are sitting below support which isn’t a good place. I am hoping that we consolidate upward to sit in the 60s again. The chart indicates we are in a confirmed downward trend we are already sitting below the support and the next support isn’t until approx .48c and I pray that we don’t fall that far. The only positive is that we are coming to the pointy end of a downward triangle which could be considered a bullish pattern. Here’s hoping for some positive news!

There is a thread dedicated to brn charts and analysis, not this thread

 

[VictorG]

Morning Diogenese,

Interesting thought...

I do not know , but I would think , if the shares actually existed ( not naked shorts ) and were one shorting entity , thay may be entitled to a seat on the board.

Or do the voting rights over shorted stock remain with the lender????? .

Who would know.......

Thankyou for all your expertise on all things of a technical nature, Greatly appreciated.

Regards,
Esq.

They do not have any rights, votes or brains. They would have to pay dividends to their lenders if BRN declared a dividend (which is not the case for the short term).

 

[Dhm]

Morning Diogenese,

Interesting thought...

I do not know , but I would think , if the shares actually existed ( not naked shorts ) and were one shorting entity , thay may be entitled to a seat on the board.

Or do the voting rights over shorted stock remain with the lender????? .

Who would know.......

Thankyou for all your expertise on all things of a technical nature, Greatly appreciated.

Regards,
Esq.

I think @Diogenese was having a small lend of the % situation.

 

[Esq.111]

Morning Dhm,

I gatherd that, but still interesting.

Regards,
Esq

 

[A8kr1]

Those 1m+ walls on the buy side have been removed so I think we can assume LDA have finished selling their shares. Shorters back in control now.

 

[Mugen74]

Those 1m+ walls on the buy side have been removed so I think we can assume LDA have finished selling their shares. Shorters back in control now.

Nah the big dogs dont show up until after 11am,this is just to instill fear buy/sell is heavily maniuplated.Big players buy/sell off screen as far as I can tell.

 

[Damo4]

Those 1m+ walls on the buy side have been removed so I think we can assume LDA have finished selling their shares. Shorters back in control now.

Not sure I agree, but let's assume you are right, how many days has the wall been up?
10/15?

 

[DerAktienDude]

Can someone from the management at least publicly acknowledge what's happening right now?
No personal e-mails, no tsex-user claiming that Akida is the de facto standard, no linkedin posts.
Just someone from management telling us because of a we're suffering b and due to c our share price declines like literally nothing else
in any current major market at the moment.

 

[buena suerte :-)]

Those 1m+ walls on the buy side have been removed so I think we can assume LDA have finished selling their shares. Shorters back in control now.

I'm afraid the shorters have ALWAYS been in control!!!

 

[Deleted member 118]

If they get to 20%, do they have to make a take over bid?

I don’t won’t no takeover bids in the coming days

 

[A8kr1]

The shorters aren't the ones putting up 4 lines of 1m+ buy walls which kept the price relatively stable the last few weeks. During that time we have seen 10m+ volume days and LDA needed to sell 25m (not sure of exact number) shares with the agreement it can't be lower than a specific level. I think it isn't unreasonable to assume that LDA had the walls set up to stop the downward momentum and to allow them to clear their shares. If they are done now then there's no need to have walls set up on the buy side so now shorters are free to push it down. Just my take.