Space Cadet
Regular
Raytheon have some interesting things in play.
https://militaryembedded.com/radar-...verging-strategic-and-tactical-communications
https://militaryembedded.com/radar-...verging-strategic-and-tactical-communications
Wow! Does that mean they are pushing us as an investment?
@cosors my apologies. No harm intended.I can deny this speculation. Electrical engineering was and is my weakness
I did not have the time to read all the posts regarding this and hope that the case has not yet occurred. To all, I would like to remind zeeb0t's and all of our rules:
"No Personal Identification - When posting any type of comment (e.g., Question, Discussion, Research, etc.) you must never identify, or remark otherwise, that, which may intentionally or inadvertently identify any living person(s), without their permission."
So my suggestion, let's just let Andreas be Andreas and be happy that Akida gets more and more attention. I think most people around us personally know our passion.![]()
I've been bangin on about Intel and Mediatek for a couple of years now.......sorry folks but it only gets worse from here....lucky @Fact Finder isn't around atm to tell all to cringe lol View attachment 12462
All fine! I just wanted to prevent that he might turn away from us because of the attention here.@cosors my apologies. No harm intended.
If this fellow is a shareholder, may you and that person reap the benefits that our little Nipper shall provide![]()
Stake (trading platform) actually asks you if you want to loan shares out. I have declined - but am impressed they provide an option.Hi alwaysgreen..............I posted in here about 2 weeks ago..ish a list of Aust Banks & Brokers who supplied shares for Shorting.
Sadly it involved EVERYONE of the Big 4 Banks and most of the minors plus every Broker name of consequence here in Australia.
Do they need to "ask" you before "loaning" your shares to Shorters? Not sure. We have all probably agreed to it some fine print on page 121 of some disclosure documents we signed or agreed to when opening our trading accounts.
Myself my Big 4 Bank accounts I am sure are used and I know for certain my SMSF accounts with Specialist Brokerages are definitely being used to supply Shorters even though I do not see any fees. (must check for that).
Sad world. Greedy.
Yak52.![]()
So base on the alcohol-infused cogitations of known unknowns.Peering into the ruby glow of the last of the claret in the crystal drinkware, the world takes on a kinder aspect.
A few pages ago someone ('pologies for forgetting) posted a report suggesting that by 2027, 87% of chips would have some form of AI.
So, how many of these chips will incorporate the first to market, best in class, all purpose, adaptable, ultra-low power, ultra-fast, de-complexed, affordable AI chip?
So in 2027, there will be N chips p.a. with AI.
Let's say we get one fifth, and let's say we get 50 cents per chip (assuming only a couple of nodes per chip).
So we would get $N/10 p.a.
Professor google tells me that there are about 170 billion chips p.a., 87% of which is about 150 billion.
Now the IoT and ADAS/AV and other growth sectors will produce a large CAGR, say 30%. This results in north of 400 billion by 2027, ie, N= 400 billion chips. That seems a little high, so lets say N = 300 billion chips p.a. by 2027.
How much is Microsoft worth?
NFA: DYOR and beware of the alcohol-infused cogitations of known unknowns.
Michael Dell actually said it Dio. Like you can't remember who posted it in here.So base on the alcohol-infused cogitations of known unknowns.
In the year 2027
From Doc Google figures:-
150 Billion ÷ 5 = 30 Billion x $ 0.5
= 15 Billion Revenue
On the figures of IoT and ADAS/EV with 30% growth:-
300 Billion @ 1% = 3 Billion × $ 0.5
= 1.5 Billion Revenue
(Please note 1% market saturation is the lowest end of the spectrum)
Please DYOR as these are numbers has derive from the intoxicated and alcohol-infused cogitations of known unknowns.
It's great to be a shareholder.
Peering into the ruby glow of the last of the claret in the crystal drinkware, the world takes on a kinder aspect.
A few pages ago someone ('pologies for forgetting) posted a report suggesting that by 2027, 87% of chips would have some form of AI.
So, how many of these chips will incorporate the first to market, best in class, all purpose, adaptable, ultra-low power, ultra-fast, de-complexed, affordable AI chip?
So in 2027, there will be N chips p.a. with AI.
Let's say we get one fifth, and let's say we get 50 cents per chip (assuming only a couple of nodes per chip).
So we would get $N/10 p.a.
Professor google tells me that there are about 170 billion chips p.a., 87% of which is about 150 billion.
Now the IoT and ADAS/AV and other growth sectors will produce a large CAGR, say 30%. This results in north of 400 billion by 2027, ie, N= 400 billion chips. That seems a little high, so lets say N = 300 billion chips p.a. by 2027.
How much is Microsoft worth?
NFA: DYOR and beware of the alcohol-infused cogitations of known unknowns.
So base on the alcohol-infused cogitations of known unknowns.
In the year 2027
From Doc Google figures:-
150 Billion ÷ 5 = 30 Billion x 0.5 cent.
= 15 Billion Revenue
On the figures of IoT and ADAS/EV with 30% growth:-
300 Billion @ 1% = 3 Billion × 0.5 cent
= 1.5 Billion Revenue
(Please note 1% market saturation is the lowest end of the spectrum)
Please DYOR as these are numbers has derive from the intoxicated and alcohol-infused cogitations of known unknowns.
It's great to be a shareholder.
Michael Dell actually said it Dio. Like you can't remember who posted it in here.
I think Dio is suggesting $30b revenue Learning
300 billion chips made, 20% will have Akida IP and we'll get 50c per chip in royalties
N
Is it not more like this....?
In the year 2027 --
300 billion chips in 2027 x 20% (Brainchip's share per Diogenes speculation) = 60 billion chips
60 billion x 10 cents / chip (Brainchip's revenue per chip per dippY22 speculation) = $6,000,000,000 or 6 billion
Diogenes thought 50 cents per Akida chip, but that would be $ 30,000,000,000 or 30 billion and I can't wrap my limited brain capacity around that revenue number.
But, this is a lot more fun to speculate about than whether our impending quarterly report will have 300,000 or a few million in it. (I say 300,000)
dippY
Speculation and opinion only
Hi Learning,My 1% market saturation is in honour of FF figures.
So we all agree then its
300 Billion ÷ 5 = 60 Billion x $ 0.5 = 30 Billion Revenue
Please DYOR as these figures derived from the intoxicated and alcohol-infused cogitations of known unknowns.
Its great to be a shareholder.