gilti
Regular
Bot ping pong madness and this sh*t is legal
Bot ping pong madness and this sh*t is legal
So we have shorters on the asx, question price wise how does our shareprice line up against the other stockmarkets BRN, are they the same value, or 1 market is greater by 20 % or are they all evenBot ping pong madness and this sh*t is legal
![]()
#adas #roadsafety #eventbasedvision #automotivetech #smartmobility | PROPHESEE
We’re pleased to share that Terranet has integrated Prophesee’s event-based vision technology into its BlincVision MVP, designed to make urban traffic safer 🚗 BlincVision combines Terranet’s laser-scanning technology and an AI model with Prophesee’s Metavision® sensors to support earlier...www.linkedin.com
Hi FuzM,Had another look at the ForwardEdge post on LinkedIn. It is filled with information to the brim and focused on EW, Radar, ISR and etc.
1. They are working towards Heterogenous Integration Platform aka SHIP 2.0 (State-of-the-art Heterogeneous Integrated Packaging). SHIP existed back in 2020. SHIP
"The theme is speed. The procurement system is built for it. The SHIP partners were chosen to accelerate the design cycle. Intel’s acquired FPGA prowess (Altera) is the key enabler of the rapid prototyping. The FPGA is not technology that will compete in high volumes or for cost-sensitive applications, but it is by far the fastest way to get hardware functionality into the field. The SHIP program also includes the other large FPGA supplier."
2. The players in the group of 19 people included RTX, Lockheed Martin, L3Harris, BAE Systems, JRC, Abraworks and etc.
Interesting to note that Abraworks mentions Neuromorphic on the Linkedin and working with NATO and partners. The rest of the members are highly focused on RF systems or deeply involved with DARPA & DOD
3. Dr Jonathan Tapson is part of the 5th group to work on providing a Solution that is a 100% U.S.-designed, verifiable RISC-V–based IP portfolio with integrated root of security and controlled distribution. Within the group includes people from Abraworks, Rambus and Lockheed Martin. Also interesting to note, Nicole Petta of Rambus came from DoD.
View attachment 95212
4. During Brainchip's Technology Roadmap, Dr Jonathan Tapson's presentation included Neuromorphic (ISA) for Akida GenAI and Akida 3.
View attachment 95210
View attachment 95211
![]()
#adas #roadsafety #eventbasedvision #automotivetech #smartmobility | PROPHESEE
We’re pleased to share that Terranet has integrated Prophesee’s event-based vision technology into its BlincVision MVP, designed to make urban traffic safer 🚗 BlincVision combines Terranet’s laser-scanning technology and an AI model with Prophesee’s Metavision® sensors to support earlier...www.linkedin.com
I think it’s startedAkiwi
Jonathan Tapson brainchip gives his talk on neuromorphic edge ai, starts @ about 1hr 6min in
![]()
Beyond von Neumann Compute: Neuromorphic AI at the Edge
As edge AI systems scale, the limitations of traditional von Neumann computing—separate memory and processing, high data movement, and power inefficiency—are...www.youtube.com
Very interesting
Live now
As edge AI systems scale, the limitations of traditional von Neumann computing—separate memory and processing, high data movement, and power inefficiency—are becoming increasingly apparent. Neuromorphic computing offers a fundamentally different approach, inspired by the structure and operation of the human brain, enabling event-driven, ultra-low-power, real-time intelligence at the edge. In this inaugural EDGE AI Neuromorphic Livestream, we bring together industry leaders, researchers, and system builders to explore how neuromorphic AI is moving from research into real-world deployment. The session will examine architectures, sensing and control applications, training methods, and benchmarking practices across both small-scale and large-scale systems. Designed for technologists, researchers, and decision-makers, this livestream will provide practical insights into where neuromorphic AI delivers real value today—and where it is headed next. Tune in for these talks from:
- Innatera
- University of Southern California
- Brainchip
- Harvard University
- Spinncloud
- Delft University
Just wondering if your interpretation of the $4 - $50 price per chip has changed since last year?$4 - $50 per chip???
View attachment 92872
NoJust wondering if your interpretation of the $4 - $50 price per chip has changed since last year?
So you believe that the variable costs to produce a silicon chip ($2.94) are the only costs requested by a chip foundry and that the receiving company is selling those chips to end users using a price per chip range of $4 - $50? Have you considered what other costs are associated with producing silicon chips that a foundry must include? For example; salaries, capital expenditure (those big buildings that house those expensive machines that make the chips), research and development and other costs that are fixed regardless of the amount ordered?No
Happy as Larry
If you tell me whether it’s for a forum, LinkedIn, or a chat, I’ll tailor it to the exact tone. Do you want it a bit more aggressive but still factual, or more laid-back with an ironic vibe? Just let me know.So
So you believe that the variable costs to produce a silicon chip ($2.94) are the only costs requested by a chip foundry and that the receiving company is selling those chips to end users using a price per chip range of $4 - $50? Have you considered what other costs are associated with producing silicon chips that a foundry must include? For example; salaries, capital expenditure (those big buildings that house those expensive machines that make the chips), research and development and other costs that are fixed regardless of the amount ordered?
It states the costs and price are both essentially variable.....cost to produce is variable around the $2.94 stated and price of sale is variable between $4-$50 depending on volume. Other costs may result in different prices for both the cost and sale price. They never stated exact definitive prices for either.So
So you believe that the variable costs to produce a silicon chip ($2.94) are the only costs requested by a chip foundry and that the receiving company is selling those chips to end users using a price per chip range of $4 - $50? Have you considered what other costs are associated with producing silicon chips that a foundry must include? For example; salaries, capital expenditure (those big buildings that house those expensive machines that make the chips), research and development and other costs that are fixed regardless of the amount ordered?
Unwatchable… igno"Watch us now!".......................................
.......................................................️
![]()
I fail to read the words "sale" on page 14.It states the costs and price are both essentially variable.....cost to produce is variable around the $2.94 stated and price of sale is variable between $4-$50 depending on volume. Other costs may result in different prices for both the cost and sale price. They never stated exact definitive prices for either.
Happy as Larry