Really? So why then did you post aemoji in the German BörsenNEWS forum over the weekend after @Dallas had commented âHoffentlich
â (=âHopefullyâ) in reference to Markus SchĂ€ferâs LinkedIn post about the NAOMI4Radar project?
And why did youthe totally misleading AI-generated summary of the NAOMI4Radar project that @Dallas subsequently also shared in the German forum, which falsely claimed Akida were the processor being used for the projectâs radar data processing?
Or did somebody hack your BörsenNEWS account and posted those emojis against your will?
P.S.: I hope this was short enough for your attention span to cope with.
Hereâs the long version with supporting evidence for those who donât have access to the BörsenNEWS app (Iâm only a silent reader in the German forum, by the way, I donât post there):
On Friday at 5.55 pm German time (which corresponds to Saturday 3.55 am Sydney time) @Dallas shared the same Markus SchÀfer LinkedIn post on the NAOMI4Radar results that I had shared here on TSE a few hours earlier:
View attachment 93280
Next, he posted âHoffentlich![]()
â, which means âHopefullyâ, obviously in reference to Akida hopefully being the neuromorphic processor that Markus SchĂ€fer was raving about.
Now guess who commented on this at some point by posting aemoji?
View attachment 93281
A few minutes later, @Dallas posted an AI-generated take on NAOMI4Radar, which badly hallucinated that BrainChip were involved in the project as a technology partner and that Akida were indeed the neuromorphic processor used for their radar data processing:
View attachment 93279
And look who gave a thumbs-up:
View attachment 93282
@Dallas then added that this should be viewed with caution, as it had not yet been confirmed.
View attachment 93283
@7fĂŒr7âs reaction was:
View attachment 93284
It was more than 2.5 hours later that one of the other posters who had initially upvoted the incorrect AI-generated summmary, expressed some doubt, posting a link to the October 2024 announcement by consortium partner TWT, in which they stated they were aiming to demonstrate the industrial applicability of Loihi 2 with NAOMI4Radar.
The same poster also wondered whether there were possibly more than one project, stating BrainChip were mentioned in another article (without providing further information, though).
To which @7fĂŒr7 replied at 11.27 pm German time*:
âLoihi is still not yet commercially available⊠if they (= Mercedes-Benz) want to bring the thing to market, they currently require the only commercially available solution in that field⊠that is?â
*= Saturday 9:27 am in Sydney and sometime earlier in the morning, wherever in Asia it is that @7fĂŒr7 says he lives
View attachment 93285
A few minutes later, another German forum poster shared a link to the
NAOMI4Radar consortiumâs final report to end the speculation about whose neuromorphic processor had been evaluated, and also specifically referenced section 3.4, which is the side note that mentions the contract awarded to BrainChip by AFRL as a radar processing research project carried out by other entities that became publicly known during the duration of the NAOMI4Radar project. @7fĂŒr7 noted what 3.4 says, but also that âit doesnât say we are involved in their project or am I overlooking something?â.
View attachment 93286
It was about half an hour later that he reacted to my post here on TSE by asking what he now suddenly claims was not even a genuine question:
So, decide for yourselves how truthful @7fĂŒr7âs statement is when he now writes here on TSE
Weâve known about the NAOMI4Radar project & Loihi 2 since October 2024.
Yet, over the weekend, @7fĂŒr7 verifiably reacted with both ato a âHopefullyâ comment by a fellow BRN shareholder referring to Markus SchĂ€ferâs LinkedIn post about the final results of NAOMI4Radar and with a
to a GenAI-summary hallucinating BrainChip were involved.
@7fĂŒr7 claims that my post - which in contrast did not say that BrainChip were involved in the NAOMI4Radar project - gave the impression that we were, because after all, this is the BrainChip forum I posted it in (as if everything in it had to do with BrainChip only) and I had been âvery vagueâ about it (had I?).
He also claims that he already knew that BrainChip wasnât involved in NAOMI4Radar when he reacted to my post by asking whether we were involved (yeah, very believable, see his emojis above - instead, he seemed confused once posters started to question the posts by @Dallas he had previously supported) and that his âquestionâ wasnât actually a genuine question at all, but was basically meant as a cunning trick question to embarrass me, as he viewed my post as suggestive of BrainChip being involved in the NAOMI4Radar project (which obviously wasnât my intention).
In addition, @7fĂŒr7 wants to make us believe that by pure coincidence he chanced upon the only one of all my posts mentioning the NAOMI4Radar project over the past 13 months, in which I did not explicitly add that Mercedes-Benz and their two consortium partners used Intel and/or Loihi 2 (which I honestly thought everyone would be aware of by now).
A post by a poster whom he claims to have on ignore. What are the chances he would have spotted my post in the first place, given that it hadnât been tagged by anyone else?
Something doesnât add up. And someone is making things up.
I could give you a reasonable explanation for every single point â why I react the way I do and what I write. But thereâs no real point, because you clearly twist things into whatever suits you â taking comments out of context just to make me look bad. Edit: you still donât know the Funktion âshow ignored contentâ
You also seem to have no understanding of normal human behavior: sometimes people post emojis just for fun, and sometimes, after doing more research, they realise that a previous post wasnât 100% accurate and then start questioning it. Itâs completely normal to later come to a different conclusion and for earlier posts to become irrelevant.
Instead, youâre busy tracking what I post in other forums just to try and expose me here. You can keep trying if you like â I honestly donât care. In the end, youâre only making yourself look more ridiculous, even though you actually had the potential to be taken more seriously by some people.
I am also requesting that you delete that post and stop this stalking behaviour.
If you tag me, mention me again, or repost my content here without my consent, I will take action â fully in line with the terms and conditions and usage policies of this forum.
Last edited: