Frangipani
Top 20
Really? So why then did you post a
emoji in the German BörsenNEWS forum over the weekend after @Dallas had commented “Hoffentlich 
” (=“Hopefully”) in reference to Markus Schäfer’s LinkedIn post about the NAOMI4Radar project?And why did you
the totally misleading AI-generated summary of the NAOMI4Radar project that @Dallas subsequently also shared in the German forum, which falsely claimed Akida were the processor being used for the project’s radar data processing?Or did somebody hack your BörsenNEWS account and posted those emojis against your will?
P.S.: I hope this was short enough for your attention span to cope with.
Here’s the long version with supporting evidence for those who don’t have access to the BörsenNEWS app (I’m only a silent reader in the German forum, by the way, I don’t post there):
On Friday at 5.55 pm German time (which corresponds to Saturday 3.55 am Sydney time) @Dallas shared the same Markus Schäfer LinkedIn post on the NAOMI4Radar results that I had shared here on TSE a few hours earlier:
Next, he posted “Hoffentlich
”, which means “Hopefully”, obviously in reference to Akida hopefully being the neuromorphic processor that Markus Schäfer was raving about.Now guess who commented on this at some point by posting a
emoji?A few minutes later, @Dallas posted an AI-generated take on NAOMI4Radar, which badly hallucinated that BrainChip were involved in the project as a technology partner and that Akida were indeed the neuromorphic processor used for their radar data processing:
And look who gave a thumbs-up:
@Dallas then added that this should be viewed with caution, as it had not yet been confirmed.
@7für7’s reaction was:
It was more than 2.5 hours later that one of the other posters who had initially upvoted the incorrect AI-generated summmary, expressed some doubt, posting a link to the October 2024 announcement by consortium partner TWT, in which they stated they were aiming to demonstrate the industrial applicability of Loihi 2 with NAOMI4Radar.
The same poster also wondered whether there were possibly more than one project, stating BrainChip were mentioned in another article (without providing further information, though).
To which @7für7 replied at 11.27 pm German time*:
“Loihi is still not yet commercially available… if they (= Mercedes-Benz) want to bring the thing to market, they currently require the only commercially available solution in that field… that is?”
*= Saturday 9:27 am in Sydney and sometime earlier in the morning, wherever in Asia it is that @7für7 says he lives
A few minutes later, another German forum poster shared a link to the
NAOMI4Radar consortium’s final report to end the speculation about whose neuromorphic processor had been evaluated, and also specifically referenced section 3.4, which is the side note that mentions the contract awarded to BrainChip by AFRL as a radar processing research project carried out by other entities that became publicly known during the duration of the NAOMI4Radar project. @7für7 noted what 3.4 says, but also that “it doesn’t say we are involved in their project or am I overlooking something?”.
It was about half an hour later that he reacted to my post here on TSE by asking what he now suddenly claims was not even a genuine question:
Are we involved in NAOMI4 radar ? Because I was reading an article that they have lohi on board?
Mercedes taps Intel Loihi2 for neuromorphic AI
Mercedes is using the Intel Liohi 2 for neuromorphic computing to improve the performance of forward-facing automotive radar systems.www.eenewseurope.com
So, decide for yourselves how truthful @7für7’s statement is when he now writes here on TSE
We’ve known about the NAOMI4Radar project & Loihi 2 since October 2024.
Yet, over the weekend, @7für7 verifiably reacted with both a
to a “Hopefully” comment by a fellow BRN shareholder referring to Markus Schäfer’s LinkedIn post about the final results of NAOMI4Radar and with a to a GenAI-summary hallucinating BrainChip were involved.@7für7 claims that my post - which in contrast did not say that BrainChip were involved in the NAOMI4Radar project - gave the impression that we were, because after all, this is the BrainChip forum I posted it in (as if everything in it had to do with BrainChip only) and I had been “very vague” about it (had I?).
He also claims that he already knew that BrainChip wasn’t involved in NAOMI4Radar when he reacted to my post by asking whether we were involved (yeah, very believable, see his emojis above - instead, he seemed confused once posters started to question the posts by @Dallas he had previously supported) and that his “question” wasn’t actually a genuine question at all, but was basically meant as a cunning trick question to embarrass me, as he viewed my post as suggestive of BrainChip being involved in the NAOMI4Radar project (which obviously wasn’t my intention).
In addition, @7für7 wants to make us believe that by pure coincidence he chanced upon the only one of all my posts mentioning the NAOMI4Radar project over the past 13 months, in which I did not explicitly add that Mercedes-Benz and their two consortium partners used Intel and/or Loihi 2 (which I honestly thought everyone would be aware of by now).
A post by a poster whom he claims to have on ignore. What are the chances he would have spotted my post in the first place, given that it hadn’t been tagged by anyone else?
Something doesn’t add up. And someone is making things up.
Last edited:
