Hi
@manny100,
at first, I didn’t get what you meant, as the October newsletter I had received in
my inbox last week (browser version:
https://mailchi.mp/brainchip/brainchip-monthly-newsletter-12819604) didn’t reveal any of this, even after clicking on all the different links it contained.
However, Professor Google kindly helped me to find those mysterious references to the new collaboration resp. partnership you had quoted. They weren’t in the actual October newsletter itself, though, but instead in a supposed summary of that newsletter on the BrainChip website - here’s the link, in case anyone else were scratching their (hopefully head lice-free) heads:
October 2025 Newsletter This October newsletter highlights major product, partnership, and industry developments at BrainChip. The issue announces the launch of the AKD1500, a next-generation ultra-efficient edge AI processor designed to deliver higher performance while keeping power...
brainchip.com
View attachment 93121
Looks like the Parsons announcement was not originally planned for the October edition of our monthly newsletter, then?
Will we hear more about the collaboration with SRS Provenance and the partnership with PreAct in the November issue instead?
Or sooner via social media channels, now that this info has been leaked anyway?
(Not that these are exactly household names that will get us all excited and the BRN share price moving north…)
Another discrepancy between the newsletter’s supposed summary and the actual newsletter that got mailed last week is the mention resp. omission of Semicon Europa 2025, which is currently taking place in Munich (18-21 November).
“BrainChip’s appearance at Semicon Europa 2025” seems to have originally been the plan, but for some reason appears not to have worked out, as the name of our company neither shows up on the Speakers’ list nor on the list of Exhibitors (
https://www.semiconeuropa.org/).
So unless this was an AI-generated newsletter summary with several hallucinations or a single person with major memory issues who wrote both texts, it appears there must have been two different authors at different points in time, but unfortunately no proofreading - which is evidently more than just spell checking…