BRN Discussion Ongoing

[Pom down under]

View attachment 90912

Apart from one job, he don’t like being in the same job too long and especially the last 6 years, which should suit him down to the ground at Brainchip

 

[Deleted member 3781]

Apart from one job, he done like being in the same job too long and especially the last 6 years, which should suit him down to the ground at Brainchip

 

[Pom down under]

Whoever employees these people that can’t hold a job down needs shooting

 

[Deleted member 3781]

Me, waiting for the gigantic buying packages that mdhere was referring to when he lashed out at me the other day when I said that the shorter will dump it back to 20,5… 21

 

[Deleted member 3781]

Whoever employees these people that can’t hold a job down needs shooting

Yeah but maybe at least he will iron the table clothes for the next exhibition

 

[HopalongPetrovski]

View attachment 90912

Never saw enough of Steve Thorne to form much of an opinion about him, but as brutal as it sounds, if he didn't perform in the period he was with us, it was time to cut him loose. I worked sales most of my career and no matter how "nice" a person you are, if you can't somehow get the runs on the board, you are redundant. It is your whole reason for being at the company, after all.
I do like the background of James Shields and think it fits with the people he will most likely be dealing with.
To be successful you need to both be able to speak to a clients concerns intelligently and win their respect.
He has the background and experience to do both.
Hopefully he has what it takes to get some success whilst he has the full backing and support of Sean and the rest of the company.
Often this window tends to start closing after 3 months or so.
So I hope he will have something tangible to show for his efforts by early in the new year.
Bring it, James.

 

[Andy38]

Because I read the content, and I do not want this discussion to continue. Easy as this.

When Slade calls posts bitchy, no matter to whom, I will always write the same thing. I often reply to posts that are not addressed to me, and others do too. What is so wrong with that?

I am not Frangipani; she is much smarter than me . Honestly, do you really think that I am Frangipani? How can I prove that I am not?
Compare her posts with mine and you will find them to be completely different in style and language.

Please collect this post as well , if you like. All this is so silly.

I thought we had clarified everything ...

Hey All, I’ve been around for a while now. Love @Bravo ’s contributions and most on here for that matter.
Please cut the crap- we’re all here (well most) for the same reason.
I’m sick of reading petty back and forth arguments.
I’m flying back to NZ to see my old man who’s on his last legs!
Let’s put things into perspective and enjoy the ride!!
Cheers
Andy

 

[Diogenese]

View attachment 90912

USAF connexions - friends in high places ...

 

[SERA2g]

Hi @SERA2g,

with all due respect, I think you're totally missing the point here.

@Bravo claims her vetted ChatGPT posts are a trustworthy source of information, as she would only ask her “friend Chatty” about topics she knows well, and would then “review, verify and refine” the replies before sharing them with us. Something I personally believe to be nice-sounding in theory, but unrealistic in practice.

When I dared to challenge this claim with supporting evidence of a hallucination I had spotted in one of the ChatGPT replies she had previously posted - combined with a dash of sarcasm (given my history with her) - I got immediately attacked by others for doing so, in a much nastier way than my post was, with those bullying me predictably deflecting from the ACTUAL issue at hand here, which is that @Bravo's claim, while sounding noble, unfortunately doesn’t stand up to reality.

And no, it didn't take a lot of effort for me to write that post at all, in contrast to other posts of mine into which I’ve invested a LOT of time both researching and writing, such as the recent ones about my observations with regard to Spartan Group and the "The Mississippi Connection".

It was prescisely from that research that I knew Cindy Hyde-Smith does not sit on the Defense Subcommittee. So it was easy for me to spot said hallucination just by glancing over the ChatGPT replies @Bravo had previously shared on that topic. And it didn't take more than a quick Google search to copy and paste the senate.gov links as supporting evidence and to re-quote our CTO on his experience that GPT-5 is still massively hallucinating, an opinion that to me personally has more credibility than the opposing opinion of an anonymous forum poster.


Fact is, and I trust you will agree with me on that, it distorts our interpretation of Jonathan Tapson's recent visit to Capitol Hill when posters falsely suggest he had been invited to meetings at the White House - like @manny100 recently did - or post unverified ChatGPT replies that claim the meeting with Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith "to promote our Federal contracting agenda" (to quote Jonathan Tapson himself) matters because she sits on the Defense Subcommittee of the Senate Committee of Appropriations (when this is simply not true), or misleading ChatGPT statements such as that our CDO "met with powerful committees (Armed Services, Appropriations)".

For all we know, he merely met with 1 out of 29 senators sitting on the Senate Appropriations Committee and another 1 out of 27 members sitting on the Armed Services Committee, not with both committees in their entirety, as the following ChatGPT reply posted by @7für7 implies:

View attachment 90900


Similarly here, where ChatGPT misleadingly claimed our CDO got “invited to meet with sitting U.S. Senators (including members of the Senate Appropriations and Armed Services Committees)”, as that equally means he would have met with more than just the two US Senators Jonathan Tapson had named in his LinkedIn post, for which there is no evidence whatsoever:


View attachment 90899



False or misleading information of that kind results in shareholders reading things into what our company actually says that are exaggerated or totally unrealistic and occasionally even breed conspiracy theories.

While Roger Wicker happens to be the Chairman of the Armed Services Committee, I personally believe that the main reason why our CDO got to meet with Cindy Hyde-Smith and Roger Wicker instead of any of the other 98 Senators was not because they sit on this or that committee (others do, too), but because they are the two Senators representing Mississippi in Congress, the state where the Spartan Group team that Jonathan Tapson thanked in his LinkedIn post is located.

Speaking of Spartan Group: ChatGPT also claimed the following:

https://thestockexchange.com.au/threads/brn-discussion-ongoing.1/post-471608

View attachment 90903

What is ChatGPT’s source here? This does not align at all with how they present themselves online. As I mentioned in one of my posts, they only seem to have recently started to offer federal government contracting consulting services. What they do specialise in to date is in tactical training for individuals, security personnel, law enforcement officers and military members, proactive security measures, risk assessment etc., which makes sense given that the company was founded by members of the US Special Operations Community.

Again, this information by ChatGPT did not get verified by the poster before sharing and hence paints the impression we get of this company in a certain way which does not appear to reflect the reality.


Forum users are free to post their ChatGPT replies as long as readers are clearly made aware that the content is AI-generated.

At the same time, however, other forum users - including me - have every right to criticise what we see as a dangerous trend to embrace the idea of LLM applications being considered the “ultimate search engine” and to take their generated content at face value, despite the notorious percentage of hallucinations and inaccuracies those models are known to produce, which makes this tool unsuitable to use it the way most people here do.

So when @Bravo makes bold claims about only consulting "Chattie" on topics she is familiar with and about diligently fact-checking the main points before posting “to ensure that ChatGPT is not hallucinating”, she needs to live with others challenging these claims when they see evidence to the contrary.

I see it as a service to keep this forum factual when posters claim factualness, yet, don’t live up to it, and this will ultimately benefit us all.

Hi Frang

Sorry, you've missed the point of my initial post.

I skimmed your email and whilst I agree concerning ChatGPT and the need for everyone to be cautious to not mislead, my post was as a result of your going out of the way to attack and break down another posters 'credibility'. And not just any poster, @Bravo whom you have routinely attacked for the past 12 months.

You have clearly spent significant time reviewing prior posts to discredit Bravo, indicated again in this most recent post.

Asking people to simply fact check is one thing, but you seem to be going out of your way with these character assassinations.

You can quite easily make the point you're trying to make with far less text and screenshots and a lot more candour and respect.

Cheers

 

[manny100]

Intel is playing a very interesting game. Obviously Loihi functions ok otherwise no one would be using it in testing alongside AKIDA.
It seems obvious that Intel sees the Neuromorphic market as very immature right now and is holding off going commercial until they see some movement in the industry.
Evidence to suggest market immaturity is our lack of progress with revenue generating sales. We are building our eco system and we have some 'big name' organisations trialing and testing our products so its still a waiting game.
.... and as always the worry is in the wait................. and so are the gains.
Once we start getting deals across the line you can bet Intel will go commercial in a hurry. It may even be before we land deals in Intel senses Neuromorphic growth is close.
Once Loihi is commercial Intel competitors will start taking a good look at us for involvement or buy out.

 

[Deleted member 3781]

Intel is playing a very interesting game. Obviously Loihi functions ok otherwise no one would be using it in testing alongside AKIDA.
It seems obvious that Intel sees the Neuromorphic market as very immature right now and is holding off going commercial until they see some movement in the industry.
Evidence to suggest market immaturity is our lack of progress with revenue generating sales. We are building our eco system and we have some 'big name' organisations trialing and testing our products so its still a waiting game.
.... and as always the worry is in the wait................. and so are the gains.
Once we start getting deals across the line you can bet Intel will go commercial in a hurry. It may even be before we land deals in Intel senses Neuromorphic growth is close.
Once Loihi is commercial Intel competitors will start taking a good look at us for involvement or buy out.

I don’t know manny… not against you… but I think this is yet another typical post full of excuses. As long as the big players don’t take action, we hear “this or that won’t happen,” and if they do, the line is “we’ll be acquired by a big company anyway.” If that’s really the only goal of a business – to wait until it gets bought out – then good luck.

These constant justifications are exhausting. Some people post endless speculation with LinkedIn screenshots of people nobody cares about – completely irrelevant to the company’s actual future – and then spin theories just to have something to post, while the forum crowd cheers as if it’s meaningful. Others keep swinging between “we’re the best,” “the market isn’t ready yet,” and “someone will buy us in the end.

Honestly, I’d rather just enjoy the memes and GIFs from Pom than read more of these pseudo-professional “I know exactly who’s using Akida, with whom, and when” posts that inevitably turn out to be empty hype. At the end of the day, we’ll only know the truth once the share price actually moves – or when a real, game-changing announcement finally arrives.

Until then, it’s all just smoke and mirrors. Cue the out-of-touch insults in 3…2…1…

Edit.
To be clear: I have nothing against posts that actually bring real, relevant content where BrainChip genuinely plays a role – I value those highly. And I’m still confident…

 

[Diogenese]

Uumm....

1,3,5,2,4??

Object Detection LP

Unlock BrainChip’s Akida object detection model with ultra-low power, real-time detection optimized for edge AI performance.

brainchip.com

Here's a clue ILL: It's not an acrostic.

 

[IloveLamp]

Here's a clue ILL: It's not an acrostic.

Had to look that one up dio engrish please

 

[Diogenese]

Had to look that one up dio engrish please View attachment 90922

An acrostic is a verse

Composed of initial letters first

Read down the page

One letter at a time

Spelling out a word in rhyme

Tickling one’s fancy

In sequence or in Lamé

Columnar is the samé

 

[MDhere]

An acrostic is a verse

Composed of initial letters first

Read down the page

One letter at a time

Spelling out a word in rhyme

Tickling one’s fancy

In sequence or in Lamé

Columnar is the samé

Another
Kudos
In
Describing
Acrostic

 

[IloveLamp]

An acrostic is a verse

Composed of initial letters first

Read down the page

One letter at a time

Spelling out a word in rhyme

Tickling one’s fancy

In sequence or in Lamé

Columnar is the samé

 

[buena suerte :-)]

Hey All, I’ve been around for a while now. Love @Bravo ’s contributions and most on here for that matter.
Please cut the crap- we’re all here (well most) for the same reason.
I’m sick of reading petty back and forth arguments.
I’m flying back to NZ to see my old man who’s on his last legs!
Let’s put things into perspective and enjoy the ride!!
Cheers
Andy

Agree with you @Andy38 ...If we were at $1++ this would not be happening!!

I can understand peoples frustration...We are all feeling it!!

There are so many great contributors here on Tse....Keep up the great work

Let's be civil .... and treat and talk to others as we would expect to be treated and spoken to!

Our day will come!!!.....

Looking forward to seeing all the Rockets and fireworks flying around again soon


Andy... Absorb this precious time with your 'old man'

 

[Slade]

Labsy started it.

 

[smoothsailing18]

Competition for maintenance through Edge Impulse partner.

 

[Tothemoon24]

Market and strategic implications​

Darwin Monkey 3 symbolizes more than a technological achievement; it reflects geopolitical competition in next‑generation AI hardware. The ability to deploy neuromorphic systems across healthcare, ICS, defense, logistics and security may shape both national resilience and private‑sector competitiveness. Importantly, as Furber notes, the hardware is ready — but the ecosystem isn’t. Development tools akin to TensorFlow or PyTorch are still emerging (e.g., PyNN, Lava), and convergence toward standards will be crucial for widespread adoption (IEEE Spectrum, 2024).
Adding to this, a 2025–2035 global market forecast projects significant growth in neuromorphic computing and sensing, spanning sectors such as healthcare, automotive, logistics, aerospace and cybersecurity. The study profiles more than 140 companies, from established giants like Intel and IBM to startups such as BrainChip and Prophesee, which are releasing joint products now, underscoring the breadth of investment and innovation. It also emphasizes challenges in standardization, tooling and supply chain readiness, suggesting that the race will not just be technological but also commercial and regulatory.

Ethics and sustainability​

As neuromorphic computing matures, ethical and sustainability considerations will shape adoption as much as raw performance. Spiking neural networks’ efficiency reduces carbon footprints by cutting energy demands compared to GPUs, aligning with global decarbonization targets. At the same time, ensuring that neuromorphic models are transparent, bias‑aware and auditable is critical for applications in healthcare, defense and finance. Calls for AI governance frameworks now explicitly include neuromorphic AI, reflecting its potential role in high‑stakes decision‑making. Embedding sustainability and ethics into the neuromorphic roadmap will ensure that efficiency gains do not come at the cost of fairness or accountability.

More recently, a US government‑backed study demonstrated that neuromorphic platforms such as BrainChip’s Akida 1000 and Intel’s Loihi 2 can achieve up to 98.4% accuracy in multiclass attack detection, matching full‑precision GPUs while consuming far less power. These chips were tested across nine network traffic types, including multiple attack categories and benign traffic, showing their suitability for deployment in aircraft, UAVs and edge gateways where size, weight, power and cost (SWaP‑C) constraints are critical. This represents a leap over earlier prototypes(~93.7% accuracy), aided by improved tooling like Intel’s Lava framework. Combined with advances in semi‑supervised and continual learning, neuromorphic SOC solutions are now capable of adapting to evolving threats while minimizing catastrophic forgetting.

Equally important, neuromorphic AI is directly tackling the SWaP problem that prevents conventional AI from running effectively at the edge. In 2022, more than 112 million IoT devices were compromised, and IoT malware surged by 400% the following year. Neuromorphic processors, such as Akida 1000, address these challenges by delivering on‑device, event‑driven anomaly detection without heavy infrastructure requirements. This positions neuromorphic SOC technologies as a practical path to securing IoT, UAVs and critical infrastructure endpoints that cannot support traditional AI models.

Neuromorphic computing and the future of edge AI

Forget quantum — neuromorphic AI could be the real disruptor, reshaping everything from medicine to warfare while cutting energy use dramatically.

www.cio.com