BRN Discussion Ongoing

Has anyone seen the video by Mercedes on the launch of their new GLC a few hrs ago?
Good news???
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 7 users

Adika

Member
Hi @Bravo,

this is what our CTO Tony Lewis, who deals with LLMs professionally on a daily basis, thinks about Open AI’s claim that “GPT-5 is significantly less likely to hallucinate than our previous models”:

https://thestockexchange.com.au/threads/brn-discussion-ongoing.1/post-472257

View attachment 90845


Your own opinion about GPT-5 is that “it has improved noticeably over its predecessor”, from which we can infer you must also believe hallucinations are now a much rarer issue, as this alleged improvement has been one of OpenAI’s main selling points with regard to their latest model.

In addition, you appear to be extremely confident about having the expertise to weed out the occasional hallucinations in the ChatGPT replies you get. At least those that relate to ChatGPT’s “main points”, which you claimed you would fact-check before sharing here on TSE “to ensure it’s not hallucinating”.
(How about hallucinations relating to minor points, though? Even inaccuarate minor points can distort our interpretation of things.)


https://thestockexchange.com.au/threads/brn-discussion-ongoing.1/post-472178

View attachment 90841


So how come the following hallucination escaped your watchful eye?

Did you not consider ChatGPT’s claim that Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith sits on the Defense Subcommittee to be one of the “main points” of the LLM’s “in-depth explanation” that would require verification before posting?

Let me help you with the fact-checking, then:

https://thestockexchange.com.au/threads/brn-discussion-ongoing.1/post-471645

View attachment 90842


FACT: No, Cindy Hyde-Smith does not sit on the Defense Subcommittee of the Senate Appropriations Committee.



Exhibit A:


View attachment 90843



Exhibit B:




View attachment 90844

Three and a half pages of complete and utter waffle. What for???

Just to accuse Bravo of not having identified that a friend of a friend of someone’s cousin on their wife’s side isn’t on a sub-committee! Give me a break. It’s not even relevant!

I agree with Slade. That was one of the nastiest and most unnecessary posts I’ve seen on here in a while.

It comes across as bullying, plain and simple.

I rarely chime in on here because I’m more of an observer than an active participant, but your behaviour needs to be called out for what it is.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Haha
Reactions: 10 users

7für7

Top 20
When our share price tries to perform like a pro..

drunk dance GIF
 

7für7

Top 20
Three and a half pages of complete and utter waffle. What for???

Just to accuse Bravo of not having identified that a friend of a friend of someone’s cousin on their wife’s side isn’t on a sub-committee! Give me a break. It’s not even relevant!

I agree with Slade. That was one of the nastiest and most unnecessary posts I’ve seen on here in a while.

It comes across as bullying, plain and simple.

I rarely chime in on here because I’m more of an observer than an active participant, but your behaviour needs to be called out for what it is.
Thank you! 😂
 
Top Bottom