How can you say that based on one photo?
In some applications, the competition might be better, considering use case/costs, there are many factors involving picking the best hardware for the job, obviously. If they as an example sell chips out of the door, it's easier for them buying direct from them and not sign an IP and then have the chip designed and produced. I think BRN have some Akida 1000 chips they have sold and maybe some 1500 as well but no Akida 2 yet.
I will vote for Sean at the next AGM if I can (I am not Australian, nor living there), he has done a good job getting the company to where we are now IMO.
Sean was not gifted the job dude, he was vetted by the founder himself (PFDM) and found worthy!
The BOD knows if he is worthy or not, not you or me. Lots of hush-hush going on behind closed doors we have no idea about, I remain confident.
It's not based on one photo It's based on more than one misleading statement.
Sean told us revenue would be lumpy and to watch the financials, and so far we've barely seen any revenue let alone a lump or two.....
Sean has been anything but straight with shareholders, you cannot deny that.
We can do better AND DESERVE BETTER imo.
Pvdm and others have also given misleading statements about progress in the past (explosion of sales comes to mind) im sure unintentionally and i bare no ill towards pvdm or his brilliance and efforts.
But as a shareholder, i don't think it's unreasonable to be kept up to date with such events, is it?
Just at the last agm we have seen Antonio (another that i will personally not be voting for), say that he has been responsible for holding back anns in the past and being too conservative regarding non price sensitive announcements, he said he would change his tact and yet we have had progress worth mentioning as non price sensitive since then and............silence (on the asx)
This engagement (NaNose) was initially announced on the asx if i am not mistaken, so isn't it reasonable to want the negative change to be communicated?
I have been invested in BRN for near on 6 years now and have seen many big statements go by the way side in that time. Sean so far imo has not delivered on his past words and i am not happy with his communication to shareholders or the market and first chance i get i will vote accordingly.
Don't get me wrong i have nothing but confidence the company has lots going on and have every confidence that Brainchip will deliver eventually.
But Sean needs to be held accountable, and to say that i am dissapointed with the companies transparency to date is an understatement to say the least.