Fullmoonfever
Top 20
Ummmm.....report would take some time to compile and write, so started a little while ago, agree?Fullmoonfever, I think perhaps we are misunderstanding one another..
My posts today were initially centred around whether or not BrainChip commissioned the report - I believe they did.
Just to clarify, I'm not suggesting that BRN provided all of the information contained in the report.. clearly the report is the work of Trim Capital, what I was saying is that Trim's assumptions and views have to be based on information that is publicly available and ALSO on information provided to them by BrainChip. The seek out public information and review the information given to them from BrainChip and then they analyse, make assumptions and write their report. That's my view.
You asked for examples in the report that could only have come from BrainChip.. Here's one:
View attachment 84587 If that reason did not come from BrainChip, why would BrainChip allow Trim to talk about a Nasdaq listing, when Antonio at the AGM, denied this (by saying they never mentioned the US and the redomicile could be "anywhere". So there are only two options, Trim have just made this potential Nasdaq listing up or BrainChip told them this. If they just made it up, Brain Chip would have spotted this error and would have made sure that Trim rectified this error before it was published.
If you don't agree, no worries that's your prerogative.
Report is dated 5th April.
AGM and Antonio's denials were 6th April.
Redomiciling Evaluation Ann via ASX (public info) came out 27th Feb.
Maybe that timeline helps you....maybe not.