BRN Discussion Ongoing

[Pom down under]

I guess you choose to either believe them or not.
It's really down to each investors judgement.

For what its worth these are my impressions of todays AGM which I watched online.
Some people have previously determined viewpoints and that tends to colour what they see appropriately.

Vianna, as chair of the meeting, is required to conduct it in a safe and orderly manner.
In that role he has the authority to shut down discussion when it is spiralling out of control, which is exactly what he did when that bloke got out of hand, trying to instigate a yelling match, towards the end.
Beyond that, I saw him take questions as they were offered.
I thought he did, as usual, a good job.

His very early remarks addressed the redomicile "elephant in the room", and as I see it he gave a credible response.
As the BOD wanted to discuss the possibility's with a wider set of consultants than they are normally dealing with, and knowing the hysteria a "leak" of said information may cause, they provided us with a heads up. This is reasonable, in my opinion.
I think he got somewhat flustered and lost his way a bit with the denying of the destination as USA, and in that regard I think he was in error.

It was good to hear FF and our Irish buddy put the issues of ASX announcements to them forcefully, and though it got a "noted" or two, I doubt we will get much movement on that. Antonio did claim the credit for this stance and as the Chair, I guess it's ultimately his call.

Sean does not present to a group well, which is a handicap in his position, but he is better, in my experience, and much less clunky, one on one.
He is driving his vision and whilst he is no show pony, I do think he is a good work horse.
As to whether we are on a profitable track, that is yet to be determined.
So far, and share price wise, which is of overwhelming importance to us, it is not performing.

But we are seeing some take up and the previous Tech roadmap was somewhat encouraging.
It also highlighted the need for constant and continuing innovation, which is best guided by continuing consultation with our still developing eco system and potential future clientele.

I wish Liebeskind would have made his presentation to us earlier than right before his vote, when he was clearly behind the eight ball given votes already cast. I thought him credible and did wind up voting for him even though I could see he wasn't likely to be successful.
I did this as a kind of non detrimental protest vote to boost his figures and perhaps give the current board some pause for thought.

There is obviously much they are privy too, that they cannot disclose publicly at this time.
This will always be the situation with an emerging tech company such as BrainChip.
It is easy to tar them with the lifestyle co meme and be disgruntled with their remuneration packages.
If it's all a con, we've done our dough.
If they are real, and the God's smile on us, we are maybe onto a multi bag winner.
I guess you choose to either believe in them or not

I did take a photo of the road map and think Sean did struggle with his talk, but seemed very confident with answering any questions that did come his way.

 

[Smoothsailing]

I thought the AGM was the best to date by far ,everyone was clearly shaken up which is understandable as we all new they would be attacked and rightly so.
Some great questions regarding presenting more at the ASX which I believe they will do moving forward when the next partners come on board this year.
I now for the first time feel we know we’re we stand as far as revenue this year and I believe we will also receive some good partnerships announced this year which will be the start of many more and will get the share price moving.
The hardest is behind us IMO. I am very happy with the team , unfortunately patients isn’t my fortay however at least we have real targets moving forward in many different verticals
Go brainchip

 

[Jacob Kiraz]

⁰

I attended the AGM the venue was very hostile that's what I felt. regarding re-domicile was mentioned and clarified but it kept coming so it became bit tense. And also the attack on Peter himself was sad to see and hear.
I am done with the forum to much personal attack and very negative.
on the last note i found the shape BRN. and pipe line its taking very positive.
Sayonara

Who attacked Peter

 

[Pom down under]

Viano either lying to an AGM or doesn't know what he's talking about. Either way, he needs to go!

No one is going anywhere for now, so I’m not having a go at you but everyone needs to suck it up and move on.

 

[Pom down under]

⁰

Who attacked Peter

Didn’t you see it the bloke with the cricket bat?

 

[Jacob Kiraz]

I did take a photo of the road map and think Sean did struggle with his talk, but seemed very confident with answering any questions that did come his way. View attachment 83865

Are you mates with Fact Finder

 

[Pom down under]

Are you mates with Fact Finder

Best mates now I shook his hand

 

[7für7]

Glad I went to to my 1st AGM today and nice to meet a few of the fellow members here @MDhere @AusEire and Jess and to say hi to most of the brainchip representatives today, but disappointed that a few were missing when I think they should have attended.

Like T&J and the dean and lolci for example?

 

[Guzzi62]

Viano either lying to an AGM or doesn't know what he's talking about. Either way, he needs to go!

How will you do that? Suck it up, nothing you can do.

Well, you can sell and forget about BRN, that's about the only option you have for the next 12 month.

 

[Pom down under]

Like T&J and the dean and lolci for example?

I did try and see if @Dolci was there but didn’t see anyone with there pet

 

[Food4 thought]

Best mates now I shook his hand

Fact finder did raise some good points about the asx
I wonder if they will actually take his advice on legal advice

 

[Pom down under]

Ok I’ve just changed my mind about attending next years AGM as just been charged $14.30 for a scooner of great northern at the airport

 

[7für7]

Ok, nice! So, nothing’s changed… share price dropped for no reason unless of course, you count the collective “glitch in the Matrix” we all witnessed with this “US-thing” . On the bright side, we’ve got major tech improvements lined up over the next 12 months, and companies can even test our products for free … until some new player enters the game. Oh, and did I forget something? Right… Sean. Time for a replacement, perhaps? As some persistent downramper has been kindly reminding us since 2023… and 2024… and yep, still 2025.


GOoOoooOo BrainChiiiiip wish us all a successful year! And, I hope they don’t remember about this US-thing…

 

[Gemmax]

⁰

Who attacked Peter

It was an attendee seated mid room behind me. He was asking many questions as he is entitled to, I understand his frustration, but he was out of line imo. ( Claiming Peter had done nothing for the Co.)

 

[AusEire]

Like T&J and the dean and lolci for example?

Exactly! Those who talk the most shit were absent or if they were there they shied away when it mattered.

 

[AusEire]

Ok I’ve just changed my mind about attending next years AGM as just been charged $14.30 for a scooner of great northern at the airport

View attachment 83868

Staff behind the bar

 

[HopalongPetrovski]

Ok I’ve just changed my mind about attending next years AGM as just been charged $14.30 for a scooner of great northern at the airport

View attachment 83868

Probably just as well Pom.
I don't think they'll let you fly the plane if you're pissed.

 

[yogi]

⁰

Who attacked Peter

One of the Share holder for not backing the guy who nominated himself for director.

 

[Smoothsailing]

One question I still have is will BRN models be suitable to integrated into this new chiplets design from Baya ( as an example. ), Something tells me they would be a good partnerships for BRN as they also are working at the edge

 

[HopalongPetrovski]

One of the Share holder for not backing the guy who nominated himself for director.

Oh, that's right. Something about how Liebeskind had "made" PVDM in the early days and now was stabbing him in the back, or something like that. Antonio shut him down, which was the correct thing to do.
Peter told him he would speak to him privately after the meeting, but the perpetrator was "going off"ranting and raving, intent on causing hubbub.