I don't think the redomicile will be on the cards for a while (if it even happens).
Even Brainchip know that there is no chance in hell that shareholders are going to vote for redomicile, unless there is a significant increase in share price (plus many other factors still to be addressed).
Of course all purely speculation at this stage, since we've been given no details on possible exchange however let's say it is the Nasdaq and base it on today's share price of 25 cents AUD. The minimum price required to list on Nasdaq is $4 USD ($6.27 AUD), so this would mean a consolidation of 25:1.
Why anyone would vote for that is beyond me.
However importantly, a redomicle MUST be approved by shareholders.
There are two shareholder votes required:
Headcount Test - a simple majority (50% plus one) of the registered shareholders,
then
Voted Shares Test - 75% of the votes cast on the resolution (this means 75% of the shares voting on the resolution).
I honestly feel like it was put out there to distract shareholders from important items relating to the AGM (like not approving the remuneration report).
As for the 4C saying, they put the idea out there to gauge shareholder reaction is nonsense. If they really wanted to know how shareholders felt, why would they not call their top 20 shareholders to see what they thought, rather than drop a price sensitive announcement that caused the share price to drop from 30c to low 20s....
Even Brainchip know that there is no chance in hell that shareholders are going to vote for redomicile, unless there is a significant increase in share price (plus many other factors still to be addressed).
Of course all purely speculation at this stage, since we've been given no details on possible exchange however let's say it is the Nasdaq and base it on today's share price of 25 cents AUD. The minimum price required to list on Nasdaq is $4 USD ($6.27 AUD), so this would mean a consolidation of 25:1.
Why anyone would vote for that is beyond me.
However importantly, a redomicle MUST be approved by shareholders.
There are two shareholder votes required:
Headcount Test - a simple majority (50% plus one) of the registered shareholders,
then
Voted Shares Test - 75% of the votes cast on the resolution (this means 75% of the shares voting on the resolution).
I honestly feel like it was put out there to distract shareholders from important items relating to the AGM (like not approving the remuneration report).
As for the 4C saying, they put the idea out there to gauge shareholder reaction is nonsense. If they really wanted to know how shareholders felt, why would they not call their top 20 shareholders to see what they thought, rather than drop a price sensitive announcement that caused the share price to drop from 30c to low 20s....